William Rodriguez ~ What the janitor knows

@gazlan wrote:

You appear to think that one group of people be believed over another. Equally there are hundreds and now as likely thousands of academics etc challenging the ‘evidence’ put forward.

Proof?

@gazlan wrote:

All moot of course being that the US Government acted against their own laws in having crucial crime scene evidence removed and destroyed.

Proof?

@gazlan wrote:

It is plain to see that there were explosions in various parts of the buildings, some say before including Rodriguez and another ~ Sanchez who also maintained the building. The statements of various first responders also tell it that way.

Lots of people are quoted as saying ‘explosion’. With all the bangs of that day, of course many people are going to say they heard explosions. Doesn’t mean that’s what they were. Common sense applies.

@gazlan wrote:

Of course, if the Government were in cahoots with A.N Other in creating this tragedy, they have in effect carried out one of the most heinous of crimes against it’s own people and as likely will get away with it.

But, as is obvious to all but the most delusional, there’s no chance in Hell that this is possible. The amount of people that would have to be ‘in the know’ to keep this a secret would run into the hundreds, probably thousands. And all of them are keeping quiet? Common sense, all I’m saying…

@gazlan wrote:

In the greater scheme and without independent research and investigative authority, I would suggest that we have all been or could be mis-guided. Your claim of me being mis-informed is a non-sense as well you know it as either argument can be definitively ‘debunked’ and conjecture will never win an argument.

Except I can and have produced proof. You have produced fantastical fantasies, ‘what if..?’ scenarios and, well, gobbledygook. You may be used to passing such rubbish on these boards before now, but I won’t let you go unchallenged.

thus
Oh, how cute. But still, you fail. You want ‘facts’ yet you fail, consistently to produce them, with all the smoke and mirrors of “hey what about…?” and yet never actually try to find the answers. Except for ones that fit your agenda.

*sigh* There’s always one. Except in this place there’s two… :lol: :roll:

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

I asked YOU what YOUR issues was, not someone else’s.

And MY issues came from the BRIEFEST of research. Ever stopped to think why William Rodriguez isn’t paraded round like a celebrity for being the man that’s single handedly brought down the US government for their heinous murder of over 3000 civilians due to their involvement in 9/11? Truth is, he’s a liar. And not a very good one, either. But he’s making a ton of money off the misery of others so why stop now?

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

It does not matter, you’re a deluded idiot.

Oh really? :)

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

It is clear to see no matter what anyone says to you, you just disagree even when you know you’re wrong :lol: .

Except, I’m not wrong. And THAT’S the part you hate, that not everyone is as gullible as you. Now use your common sense, take off the tin foil hat and come back and join us on Planet Earth.

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

As funny as it maybe to laugh at your stupidity, it does take away from the purpose of the topic in question.

But the topic in question is YOUR stupidity, surely?

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

The last time I attempted to engage you and showed you specifically my points, you not only did not look at them, your reply had nothing to do with the points in question.

Ah now, you see… This, THIS is how the paranoid idiots behind conspiracy theorists try to work their arguments. By lying. Go back to that thread. I clearly stated that I had watched those videos you posted, and posted some that I found that completely debunked yours. And I posed a very pertinent question which I asked you to answer. Your response? To silently walk away. So don’t lie. You walked away, and you’ll no doubt do the same here.

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

You have no intelligence, or anything of value to offer in a discussion. :roll:

Other than the truth, you mean.

So bring it on, bîtches! :D

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

@themaster wrote:

@twistinmymelonman wrote:

You’re clearly just running your mouth, you cannot even express your own issues with what he says. Instead you give a link, and expect people to sift through an entire website. If you cannot or will not say what issues you have about his statements, why even bother to bring it up in the first place? :roll:

You asked me to clarify my statement, yes? I have done so. The fact that it’s too much for you is not really my problem.

Now, you have a choice. Sit there and whinge that being proven wrong is hard work or TRY and engage in a debate that is largely unnecessary as you’re fighting a losing battle.

I asked you to be specific, you’re to lazy or don’t know what you’re talking about. Once again you’re shown to be a senseless idiot who does not have a clue.

High 5 to the Twistedmelonman!! I like you!! lol