Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › will the EU leave Britain?
-
AuthorPosts
-
2 July, 2012 at 7:19 pm #501373
@panda12 wrote:
I think if we do have a referendum and the arguments for and against are presented then the British electorate will vote yes.
That made me chuckle. :lol:
2 July, 2012 at 7:24 pm #5013743 July, 2012 at 6:39 am #501375Mrs T; anc, panda and Nigel Far – oh soz Terry
Mrs T – Norway isn’t such a viable option.
Norway is quite prosperous because of its oil, but it’s become known as a ‘fax democracy’. It has all the advantages of EU membership because it has access to the Single Market through its membership of the EEA (with Iceland, which wants to join the EU), but but but it has no seat at the decision-making table, and Brussels just forces its rules onto the norwegian statute book – about 75% of EU directives are incorporated into Norwegian law. IT’s known as a afax democracy because Brussels rules the country by sending faxes – a democratic deficit plus.
Anc – the City is the big card that the UK can and does play. The German banks in the end tell the Chancellor to calm down the French when it comes to UK membership.
Terry, panda could well be right. You have a limited memory of the EEC referendum of 1975 – for many years Brits told pollsters that they wanted nothing to do with the EEC, – it meant the end of cheap New Zealand butter. But when the campaign took place, the final majority was overwhelmingly for entry. The EU is the world’s single biggest market – better in than out. Brits are quite sensible in the end methinks, though I’m sure UKIP has some mileage to go yet.
To me – more democracy is a necessity, and the UK should be demanding it. The EU is a bureaucratic monstrosity as it stands.
3 July, 2012 at 7:05 am #501376Careful, Scep no doubt you will incur the wrath of our “lovely” Terry.
I only recently found out there was a referendum in 1975 so I looked it up and it states before polling many were opposed to entry.
I feel this generation will be the same. The vast majority of the population will not fall for propaganda propelled by the likes of UKIP and the Daily Mail.
I think the right to vote in the referendum should also be given to the Europeans who live here as it any decision would affect them as well.
3 July, 2012 at 7:37 am #501377OK, I dont profess to be fully informed about the EU… in fact I doubt any of us know fully what the advantages are of being a member…. I have read though that it costs us between 14.5 and 17.5 billion each year to be a member although we do get back about 4 billion in subsidies.
I wonder what we want from the EU… is it as a trading partner? Because that was what we thought we were voting for in the last referendum… if so thats what Norway has…… and wait for it… they contribute nothing to the EU…. so they have what we all voted for in the last referendum for nothing.
If its more than trading we want… what is it? What is it that attracts us to it….. Im trying to think of the advantages? Anyone know?
3 July, 2012 at 8:48 am #501378Scept – I used to work in the City – you either didn’t know that, but you do now! :) So, in that case, you will know, that I agree with you! :D
4 July, 2012 at 10:34 am #501379@anc wrote:
Scept – I used to work in the City – you either didn’t know that, but you do now! :) So, in that case, you will know, that I agree with you! :D
Anc,
I read last week in the FT that the City was appalled when Cameron vetoed he EU deal last December in the name of the City.
He didn’t consult them.
They are very much in favour of keeping inside the world’s single biggest market, and are worried that the UK taking a position of half-in half-out is going to lead to us being in the same position as Norway – having to do what we’re told without having any say.
A referendum isn’t inevitable. The eurozone crisis is frightening a lot of people, inside and outside the Eurozone (Norwegians are wanting to leave both the EU and the EEA, which gives them access to the EU, but the Norwegian govt is aware of what will happen at that point).
Cameron is using demands for a referendum to appease the Tory/UKIP people (UKIP olls are threatening Tory marginals) and warn the EU leaders. One of his best arguments to the Tory eurosceptics was to warn them that they may get what they wish for – a referendum – and that a defeat for them in such a vote (which is not at all unlikely) would finally kill them and UKIP together.
We’ve gone too far since 75 to just opt out and choose pie-in-the-eye fantasiies of a Norway/Switzerland arcadia of bankers dancing around maypoles as the alternative.
Better to demand a more democratic EU.
4 July, 2012 at 11:10 am #501380@anc wrote:
Scept – I used to work in the City – you either didn’t know that, but you do now! :) So, in that case, you will know, that I agree with you! :D
Did you see USED to work in the City? Bailed out a long time ago!! :?
4 July, 2012 at 11:17 am #501381Scept – seeing as you have replied to me, this is my opinion – the EU, should go back to what it was originally created for – trade! Harmonising different people under a German/French system will never bide harmony across Europe to us, or any other country inclusive of them! 8)
4 July, 2012 at 12:52 pm #501382anc, I think it was created for more than trade.
The Treaty of Rome was set up to create a sngle market as a prelude toe ventual econommic and political union – de Gaulle demurred when he got in power.. That’s why the UK kept out, and soon regretted keeping out.
I can get chaprter and verse for the Euro-Federalists if needed (I think :?: ), but Germany itself evolved out of a customs union – the Zollverein – set up in 1818. Took em 53 yrs. Will take the EU longer, for sure, but money is power – they’ll get there.
Whether trade or whatever, it needs to be democratic. It’s politically horrible at the moment.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!