-
Posts
-
What is it with JC?
A thread rightly described by chowa as a flame thread aimed at attacking people who don’t come on the boards to defend themselves, containing many offensive posts, is still there and active.
But a thread paying tribute to the dead of Aberfan on the 50th anniversary – a tribute respected nationwide – is removed!!!
Martin, some explanation is needed if JC is to retain any respect at all.
It’s NOT deleted .. It’s on the getting serious thread where it should of been.
Now apologise to UK !!!!
A rational person would have just asked politely. Rather than jumping to hysterical conclusions. Petty point scoring and dragging other peoples names into that petty point scoring, in order to give that petty point scoring imagined validity. While he criticizes the site owner. D’oh!
Still on a positive note, at least he spelt it correctly this time.
h,a I bet hes feeling petty pretty silly now excuse me for laughing at himbut vic the dick sounds apt
he cant even read the boards properly
Erm don’t apologise Scep lol…..Martin is obviously trying to get activity across the boards but this forum 3 has always been a mish mash…..he never explains when asked a question…..fair enough he’s not answerable to us but we have been loyal minions to the site for years….it’s flipping Courtesy
this morning the “lie” thread had been removed and now it’s back there are posts missing
A rational person would have just asked politely. Rather than jumping to hysterical conclusions. Petty point scoring and dragging other peoples names into that petty point scoring, in order to give that petty point scoring imagined validity. While he criticizes the site owner. D’oh! Still on a positive note, at least he spelt it correctly this time.
Hysterical?? Post is pretty valid considering the past on deleted posts
Yes, some of the wrinklies who inhabit these boards, think they own the place because of ‘time served’. They won’t put their hands in their pockets and financially contribute, the financial risk is not theirs, yet expect the site owner to pander to their paranoia. If this site is as crap as they keep saying, why don’t they bugger off and open their own site.
Yes, some of the wrinklies who inhabit these boards, think they own the place because of ‘time served’. They won’t put their hands in their pockets and financially contribute, the financial risk is not theirs, yet expect the site owner to pander to their paranoia. If this site is as crap as they keep saying, why don’t they bugger off and open their own site.
hardly a rational alternative…..if you don’t like a hotel you stayed in you find another next time…..if someone doesn’t like this site they’ll find another one not open one of their own…hands in pockets has nothing to do with it….you’ve aired your dislike for Scep and moan about him in most posts yet you stay…why not open a new site where he can’t join?
Kin ell Kenty why are you defending him on this one, he’s more than capable of turning this on everyone and sliming his way out of it. He’s the first to have digs at people about not reading the boards properly and he’s well guilty of doing just that here.
Testicle has dropped one of his bollox here – end of.
Hysterical?? Post is pretty valid considering the past on deleted posts
Thank you, ms K.
A voice of reason as well as wit ever since I’ve been in JC.
Almost everyone of my posts seems to attract the 3 or 4 notwits with attacks ranging from petty malice to (in one person’s case) the berserk
You said it all, Ms K., and they’re still not going to listen. If I spent my time answering them (or taking them seriously), I’d have no life. And every day would be spent fretting about the latest post. It wouldn’t surprise me if this post didn’t lead to a similar railing, so I will reply to them when I feel it’s important to do so.
Sorry, spend your life thinking about something else than driving me off, you gang. It ain’t gonna happen. I’ll leave in my own time, unless you can persuade Martin to ban me. Present a case to him..you never know your luck.
This topic is temporarily locked.