-
Posts
-
This debate hasn’t evolved at all. We still have an individual using aggressive sexist language to describe women as physically “inferior” to men, applying only his descriptors to reach that conclusion and suggesting only his choice of sport applies, which changed when he realized men do not dominate women in all sport as he originally stated. Finally his conclusion is now exactly the same as was put to him at the start and in which he argued differently. It is totally irrelevant how many sets women play or don’t play while the male rule makers in the game make that decision on their behalf. A pointless debate.
This debate hasn’t evolved at all. We still have an individual using aggressive sexist language to describe women as physically “inferior” to men, applying only his descriptors to reach that conclusion and suggesting only his choice of sport applies, which changed when he realized men do not dominate women in all sport as he originally stated. Finally his conclusion is now exactly the same as was put to him at the start and in which he argued differently. It is totally irrelevant how many sets women play or don’t play while the male rule makers in the game make that decision on their behalf. A pointless debate.
You need a crash course in human biology if you think women can match physical attributes of men in sport. You still can’t name a single sport where women outperform men and are simply embarrassing yourself with no logic to your posts other than the usual rantings of sexism displaying your ignorance in understanding what the word actually means.
As far as male rule makers of wimbledon go , bearing in mind the patron is the duchess of cambridge and the director of the entire championship is female – it confirms what we already know… that you are as thick as pig sh1t sadly and havent a clue what you are talking about.
and suggesting only his choice of sport applies, which changed when he realized men do not dominate women in all sport as he originally stated.
Nothing has changed , all sport that doesn’t involve animal or machine
You need a crash course in human biology if you think women can match physical attributes of men in sport. You still can’t name a single sport where women outperform men and are simply embarrassing yourself with no logic to your posts other than the usual rantings of sexism displaying your ignorance in understanding what the word actually means.
I am not ranting at all. Far from it. Why are you trying to dictate what I feel or don’t? Just like other people who also think your comments are sexist are also not “stupid” as you branded them. You didn’t mention “biology” until others quite rightly did. You pepper your language with aggressive sexist statements which is what I object to. Finally you keep including sport of your choice after originally stating men “dominate” women all ALL sport. They clearly don’t.
The conversation could have evolved into whether women will ever close the 10% gap in some sport and why women compete equally in others. etc etc but unfortunately because you are so rigid in your views there is nowhere else for this topic to go. In my opinion.
As well as the sports I have mentioned women could compete with men in boxing, football, athletics and some would win. The women would outjab the men using their speed to win on points and in football have faster wingers to win matches. If people think women would lose then as Ge says they are sexist pigs. It also doesn’t matter how many sets women play as they are under more cyclelogical pressure so I think they deserve more pay and if you don’t agree then maybe you should TAKE YOUR SEXISM AND RACISM SOMEWHERE ELSE.
They are inferior in ability and play 3 sets instead of 5 so should get paid less.
You didn’t mention Wimbledon in your initial posts, you can move the goal posts now all you like, but the fact is MEN make the rules in WORLD tennis not “patrons” and the rules that MEN make dictate that women only play 3 sets. Exactly the same prevailing sexism that dictated until fairly recently up to the the 60’s and 70’s that women are incapable of running longer distances.
Enjoy your night.
You need a crash course in human biology if you think women can match physical attributes of men in sport. You still can’t name a single sport where women outperform men and are simply embarrassing yourself with no logic to your posts other than the usual rantings of sexism displaying your ignorance in understanding what the word actually means.
I am not ranting at all. Far from it. Why are you trying to dictate what I feel or don’t? Just like other people who also think your comments are sexist are also not “stupid” as you branded them. You didn’t mention “biology” until others quite rightly did. You pepper your language with aggressive sexist statements which is what I object to. Finally you keep including sport of your choice after originally stating men “dominate” women all ALL sport. They clearly don’t. The conversation could have evolved into whether women will ever close the 10% gap in some sport and why women compete equally in others. etc etc but unfortunately because you are so rigid in your views there is nowhere else for this topic to go. In my opinion.
What other people think or don’t think is irrelevant and doesn’t detract from anything as I’m confident enough in facts without needing affirmation of it on an internet forum. You seem to think you are in a majority despite others on the thread laughing at your posts but if you honestly think women are physically equal to men in sporting circles why don’t they compete against one another? I object to your presence on this forum, you’re a bag of hot air that is full of waffle and when challenged come up short in every way. Despite being asked several times to provide examples to validate your points of these sports and other things discussed you keep reverting to the usual silly sexism rhetoric. There’s only so many times I can ask you to provide eg of sports women beat men at before realising you are talking to someone out of their depth and pissing in the wind.
Name a single sport with evidence behind it showing women can compete and beat men for the fifth time
As well as the sports I have mentioned women could compete with men in boxing, football, athletics and some would win. The women would outjab the men using their speed to win on points and in football have faster wingers to win matches. If people think women would lose then as Ge says they are sexist pigs. It also doesn’t matter how many sets women play as they are under more cyclelogical pressure so I think they deserve more pay and if you don’t agree then maybe you should TAKE YOUR SEXISM AND RACISM SOMEWHERE ELSE.
Well said Suzanne43, some people on this site have suggested you are really male, DOA or Alfie pretending to be a female ID to troll this site, I defended you against that sexism and in my eyes you are all women.
Incidentally your continual crawling up womens arses on this forum is particularly sickly. I suspect even the women you are evidently trying to impress defending an argument with no basis of fact find you fairly cringeworthy and creepy. Grow some balls and a spine instead of the racism, sexism cards trying to win cheap popularity points on an internet forum…. it’s pathetic to see you deny biological facts to appear as some kind of white knight coming to the rescue. Even women on the thread are disagreeing with what you are saying bar the odd lunatic talking about the knitting world champion.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!