-
Posts
-
Lol. I had no idea you are such an expert on sociology Drac, I am impressed. Being scientific yourself though, because according to you sociology isn’t science and reiterating that science only counts, surely you must have some ideas yourself relating to this issue?
The persion with a PhD knows something about research methodology, weird.
Do you think sexism exists in society or not and if you don’t think sexism exists, why not?
When did I say anything even remotely similar to that?
Lol. I had no idea you are such an expert on sociology Drac, I am impressed. Being scientific yourself though, because according to you sociology isn’t science and reiterating that science only counts, surely you must have some ideas yourself relating to this issue?
The persion with a PhD knows something about research methodology, weird.
Do you think sexism exists in society or not and if you don’t think sexism exists, why not?
When did I say anything even remotely similar to that?
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I’m not surprised Ge harrasses women online , the ones that play the white knight coming to the rescue in the sickly way he does on every thread to try to win brownie points are normally the ones guilty of doing what they claim to despise themselves. As we can see from his pm to suz43, he’s clearly a sickly sex pest only interested in cam antics pretending to be some sort of champion for feminism whilst out of his depth on every topic intellectually he has ever discussed. To summarise, a low IQ ,depraved moron that is disingenuous in his real reason for arguing topics like this driven by the insatiable desire to satisfy his tiny overactive ballbag bubbling over in frustration at having no one who wishes to empty it whilst he sits cock in hand on his cam … case closed.
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Don’t avoid the question with another question. I am not playing your endless question game. You could have just simply answered to which I would have happily responded. A pretty simple, sincere question. If you want to play it safe that of course is your prerogative. Personally had I been asked, I would have responded.
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Don’t avoid the question with another question. I am not playing your endless question game. You could have just simply answered to which I would have happily responded. A pretty simple, sincere question. If you want to play it safe that of course is your prerogative. Personally had I been asked, I would have responded.
The problem is you can’t answer a single question asked of you as when challenged you just keep reverting back to your generic phrases again quoting examples of men proposing to women as examples of sexism/ male aggression lol. I don’t think you realise how weak and pathetic your posts are- there’s no substance to any of them, just hot air.
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
This isn’t a question.
How can I avoid the question when you didn’t ask one?
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Don’t avoid the question with another question. I am not playing your endless question game. You could have just simply answered to which I would have happily responded. A pretty simple, sincere question. If you want to play it safe that of course is your prerogative. Personally had I been asked, I would have responded.
The problem is you can’t answer a single question asked of you as when challenged you just keep reverting back to your generic phrases again quoting examples of men proposing to women as examples of sexism/ male aggression lol. I don’t think you realise how weak and pathetic your posts are- there’s no substance to any of them, just hot air.
The grown ups, with a real Ph.D, not a JC one, will read the entire thread and make their own minds up based on the entire content and in context. That is all I have got to say to you today.
Weird yes. You don’t type like someone with a Ph.D In fact not even degree level.
I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.
Don’t avoid the question with another question. I am not playing your endless question game. You could have just simply answered to which I would have happily responded. A pretty simple, sincere question. If you want to play it safe that of course is your prerogative. Personally had I been asked, I would have responded.
The problem is you can’t answer a single question asked of you as when challenged you just keep reverting back to your generic phrases again quoting examples of men proposing to women as examples of sexism/ male aggression lol. I don’t think you realise how weak and pathetic your posts are- there’s no substance to any of them, just hot air.
The grown ups, with a real Ph.D, not a JC one, will read the entire thread and make their own minds up based on the entire content and in context. That is all I have got to say to you today.
I think most reading this thread will realise you are someone with a baseless argument lacking logic, coherence and intelligence projecting a view which is motivated by other factors than you claim. You have been unable to answer a single question put to you , revert back to default mode setting of generic rhetoric regurgitated like a 3rd world lavatory containing phrases you don’t fully understand in an effort to appear far more intelligent than you actually are.
The longer the thread goes on, the clearer it is you are someone utterly out of their depth on every level clutching at more straws than a horny scarecrow to validate your pitifully weak arguments in a desperate attempt to portray yourself as someone who hasn’t been completely obliterated once again.
You have been unable to answer a single question put to you , revert back to default mode setting of generic rhetoric regurgitated like a 3rd world lavatory containing phrases you don’t fully understand in an effort to appear far more intelligent than you actually are. clutching at more straws than a horny scarecrow to validate your pitifully weak arguments in a desperate attempt to portray yourself as someone who hasn’t been completely obliterated once again.
I sometimes wonder whether to start a poll on who has the most inventive use of savage invective. There are a number who qualify, but the Norfolk Man comes pretty high.
I am sometimes forced against my will to laugh.
This is not a comment on any victim of this invective, merely a reluctant appreciation of the nasty imagery.
1 member liked this post.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!