Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › White liberals are the decent people’s enemy
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 January, 2008 at 11:46 pm #9096
You may have watched a programme wednesday night on channel 5 about racial unrest in a californian prison.
It centred on one particular wing, with approximately 70% of the inmates mexican, 15% white and 15% black. It explained that the whites and blacks were constantly under threat due to their lack of numbers, and told the story of mexicans beating up some whites.
Sunday last, and repeated now, BBC2 and Louis theroux (a white jewish liberal) is also telling the story of life in an american prison, explaining that there is a racial divide between blacks, whites and mexicans.
But, the programme only shows us the innocent story of the black inmates, and gives the impression that the whites are the baddies.
Why does one programme produced by white liberals give a totally different picture of racial unrest?
24 January, 2008 at 11:49 pm #306875…. because Louis Theroux is NOT a member of the BNP I guess.
25 January, 2008 at 10:52 am #306876i reckon its simple emma. they rang parliament here, and said. pick a colour.
black.
white.
brown.
yellow.
the switch board operator says. “why should i pick any of these, my favourite colour is green.?
no we need you to pick one of the four offered.
ok says the girl. ill pick black.
thank you black it is why did you pick black ?they ask.
because most of my clothes are black, i dont like to stand out in a crowd and black enables me to blend in un noticed.i can sort of hide in black.
pick a second colour please.
oh dear im not sure now ? says the woman.yellow, she says.
why yellow, asks the caller.
because yellow is bright and sunny and reminds me of warm weather and having fun. ok comes the answer.
now pick a third. doh! says the girl, i dont like brown, it reminds me of mud, and wearing wellies and getting wet,and being cold, i hate getting dirty and wet. and i cant stand the cold.
ok thats not a problem.
so that leaves white. says the caller.
yes, but white is hard to keep clean, it stains easily and when it goes off white it looks grubby and makes you look unclean and scruffy.ah ! comes the answer. so you think that.
black people keep in the background and blend in with out much fuss.you think… yellow people are nice and bring you happiness and make your life better.
you are racist toward brown people, and you dont want them around you, because they are cold and indifferent, and dont meet your standards.
and you think… that white people are the cleanest, but if they mix with any oher colour they become unclean and grubby and you would not mix them if you had the choice.
no ! says the woman i never said thast..i dont believe this.. i didnt mean that at all.
were not intrested in what you actually said, were making a documentary and the facts are the last thing we need to know, god knows theres no mileage in saying different colours can actually complement each other. that white people put themselves last quite often,. they want the truth..
26 January, 2008 at 12:27 pm #306877Since Emma’s definition of ‘white liberal’ probably extends to include the likes of President Bush, Boris Johnson, Lord Tebbit, Jeremy Clarkson and probably the late Bernard Manning, we can dismiss all these rants as nonsense.
27 January, 2008 at 12:01 am #306878Clarkson is a “media liberal”, meaning he wants folk to like him and what he does, so he pretends to like people. You can tell he’s on the side of decency with his no nonsense actions.
Bernard was a realist, liberalism and realism dont go together, its nonsense to suggest otherwise.
27 January, 2008 at 12:18 am #306879@emmalush wrote:
Clarkson is a “media liberal”, meaning he wants folk to like him and what he does, so he pretends to like people. You can tell he’s on the side of decency with his no nonsense actions.
Bernard was a realist, liberalism and realism dont go together, its nonsense to suggest otherwise.
I disagree. Clarkson has his views and sticks to them like glue. He loves fox hunting and I hate it, but agree with pretty much all of his views on other subjects.
He slagged off internet and credit card fraud a few weeks ago and said you can do nothing with account numbers and sort codes… the next week he was eating humble pie after his account got cloned :lol:
11 February, 2008 at 1:36 am #306880White liberals tell us that “we cant do without immigration, it boosts our economy”.
White liberals tell us that the Poles are hard working.
White liberal politcal and social policy has encouraged more crime on our streets with their open-door immigration policy.
One immigrant is arrested every 4 minutes on britain’s streets, the Poles being the worst.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/29163/One-migrant-nicked-every-four-mins/Are you starting to realise that liberalism does not work?
What are you going to do to rectify the problem of white liberal leadership?
13 February, 2008 at 2:06 am #306881When it comes to the enemies of decent people, white liberal Harriet Harman is listed amongst the top lot. So its no surprise then, that she appears next in this thread.
Given the job of “Equalities minister”, she’s now proposing the INequality of “positive discrimination” towards white people in the job application of MP, in atleast 8 constituencies where non whites live in big numbers.
New Labour’s policy over the past 30 years has been to engauge the non white community for the block vote to edge an election.
New Labour’s white liberals have gone so far, that the average white person is leaving them in big numbers, so they now disregard a large number of white voters in favour of non whites via non white candidates, desperate to hold on to power.
New Labour are creating a colour divided society.
Normally, white liberals tell us that colour doesn’t matter. Do you trust white liberals?
13 February, 2008 at 3:38 pm #306882There must be something in lental soup that draws a certain kind, as incredibly for the second day running, i hear about another white liberal called Harriet, this time Harriet Lamb, Director of the Fairtrade Foundation, who was interviewed on radio five live by Simon Mayo this afternoon. She was trying to explain why everyone should buy “fairtrade” products.
Simon asked something like, for enviromental reasons, is it better to buy flowers from Sufolk or Kenya? She refused to say yes and said climate change is a problem, then making the point that its better to help the fairtrade movement than buy local. Who’s side is she on?
She was then forced to explain that the cost of some fairtrade products are dearer than others, after an emailer explianed some products are double the cost, and that some company’s are abusing fairtrade to line their pockets.
I wonder how much she earns, and has earned in the last 6 years as “Director of the Fairtrade Foundation” and how much she’ll earn through the book she was publicising, which is called “Fighting the Banana Wars and Other Fairtrade Battles”?
Throughout she had a snivelling awkward laugh, probably brought on by the lental soup, or was she just trying to capture the snot running from her nose, who knows. The snivelling makes her say the most rediculous things, she said, “people up and down the country are dressing up in banana costumes to explain the fairtrade message”, then 30 seconds later after Simon mayo said ive never seen one, saying its only fairtrade campaigners doing this, SPIN.
13 February, 2008 at 7:12 pm #306883I always try and buy fairtrade items, but would not be surprised to find there is some fat cat somewhere creaming off the profits.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!