-
Posts
-
@forumhostpb wrote:
@wilma wrote:
To pass on information meant to humiliate or hurt another human being is very wrong and cannot possbly be justified unless in kindergarten of course!!
Geoff does this all the time …. don’t you Geoff???
Only since it became JC terms and conditions Hoseason.
No wonder I never post on JC, one comment, just one and it’s seized on and deciphered in feck knows how many different ways :?
Hmm, I suppose it depends on who reads what, who deciphers what in what way and ……..oh who is worried that the written word is aimed at them.
*Hugs Mims* :)
hey wilma ! aye nae wonder HEN,,
geoff is a wee tube. I have him on a wee dream!
poor weee cuntybaws.
@rubyred wrote:
hey wilma ! aye nae wonder HEN,,
geoff is a wee tube. I have him on a wee dream!
poor weee cuntybaws.
just love that word 8) 8) 8) 8)
fancy a ragu rubes?
@wilma wrote:
No wonder I never post on JC, one comment, just one and it’s seized on and deciphered in feck knows how many different ways :?
Hmm, I suppose it depends on who reads what, who deciphers what in what way and ……..oh who is worried that the written word is aimed at them.
*Hugs Mims* :)
Its an odd old world isn’t it wilms. I look at it all and I just smile.
Oh and pats, you got the wrong one bless your cotton socks.
@minim wrote:
Oh and pats, you got the wrong one bless your cotton socks.
ur right mims. i realise now you only tolerate geoffrey for rotts sake.
erm.. you totally misunderstood that
neither do we…..ur the one spoutin off about fastcars makin me wet…………oh an btw…….does the pic rott sent me of him and his son in the bath….make mims unfit too look after children….cos accordin to rott she took it.
Pats, I hadn’t noticed this comment when you posted it, I don’t read everything that is posted on the boards. It was only after your conversation on another thread with ROTT that I looked for it.
You were using personal information given to you in msn to point score Pats. We may not be seeing eye to eye at the moment, but to imply I am an unfit mother??? that is a bit low. Why bring that photograph up anyway? It had nothing to do with the conversation you were having with Geoff. It was a cheap shot.
It has been established I didn’t take that photo. The photograph I did take of ROTT was of him fully clothed, wearing sunglasses and looking rather cute.
Pats… enough is enough. You are saying things that I know you dont really mean.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!