-
Posts
-
ID like to thank hugs for inspiring me to write this thread
he has just informed us on the fatwa thread that his iq is a whopping 168,well that got me thinking wonder what mine is so I went online to the mensa quiz I wont give you the link cos if you cant find it yourselves then theres no point you participating tbh
anyway lets all be truthful and tell us what score did you get
my thread me first I got 110,did well in somethings but all those patterns shapes forms things like what goes where mashed my head in
so im the 2nd highest so far league table
1,hugs 168
2,me 11o.
1 member liked this post.
My IQ ranges from 135 to 142 depending on what test I take but I question the whole concept of IQ tests as it is supposed to be “innate intelligence” which is what you have naturally . You can actually work on your IQ score once you understand what the tests look for ( number patterns , word association etc) rendering the whole test pointless… there are even books published entitled ” Improve your IQ score” which means it is not true IQ but acquired knowledge.
3 members liked this post.
Ditto Norfolk, plus I just cba, however I don’t think I’m too dim….
To be honest IQ test are designed so that they can con people into thinking they are cleaver, when they are actually designed to get people to pay to join Mensa.
Even if you get a load of monkeys to do a multiple question test with answers a,b,c, and d, 1 in 4 will get the first question right, 1 in 16 will get the first 2 right, 1 in 64 will get the first 3 right, therefore if you get enough monkeys to do the test some will come out with high IQ’s and some low, yet none would be able to answer the questions they are being asked.
With the IQ tests its possible with a bit more intelligence than others to work out the answers to the easier ones and be able to workout some of the answer from the harder ones that can not be the correct,then guess which might be right.
Its not always the case of looking for the right answer, it can be a case of looking for the wrong ones.
Having been brought up doing puzzles and being able work out things by probability, I am able to beat the IQ test.
To be honest IQ test are designed so that they can con people into thinking they are cleaver, when they are actually designed to get people to pay to join Mensa. Even if you get a load of monkeys to do a multiple question test with answers a,b,c, and d, 1 in 4 will get the first question right, 1 in 16 will get the first 2 right, 1 in 64 will get the first 3 right, therefore if you get enough monkeys to do the test some will come out with high IQ’s and some low, yet none would be able to answer the questions they are being asked. With the IQ tests its possible with a bit more intelligence than others to work out the answers to the easier ones and be able to workout some of the answer from the harder ones that can not be the correct,then guess which might be right. Its not always the case of looking for the right answer, it can be a case of looking for the wrong ones. Having been brought up doing puzzles and being able work out things by probability, I am able to beat the IQ test.
What a ridiculous post again. Leaving aside your description of ” cleaver” which epitomises the level you operate at , no one could take continual tests and by your implication fluke answers by guesswork using the monkey analogy. I’d love to know what you mean by ” beating the IQ test” as there is no upper barrier in theory… do you honestly think anyone on here believes someone who can’t even spell clever has a higher IQ than Einstein? I’ve seen some deluded saps over the years, but you are the grand daddy of them all… what a plum.
2 members liked this post.
Different IQ tests have different maximums, so unless you give the name of the test, a score on its own is not really meaningful.
1 member liked this post.
i agree CLIVE, i know the nhs iq test is biased to people who are great at maths, i even seen a tv programme, showing a group of very clever people, and the ones who got the large scores in the iq test was the math expert an the physics expert, it is as dumb as the b.m.i test, why companys still use idiotic tests i have no idea, prob made by some gov or biasd type person.
Different IQ tests have different maximums, so unless you give the name of the test, a score on its own is not really meaningful.
which ever test you do, claiming 168 out of the blue is laughable
idk what does 168 mean?
-
This reply was modified 7 years ago by
JUSTNOTHING.
https://www.arealme.com/iq/en/
i got 120 from that 1q test but i got bored after question 10 and just clicked any -
This reply was modified 7 years ago by
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!