Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 78 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1123029

    Pathetic springs to mind…

    #1123030

    Ge

    Look…

     

     

    It’s Morg melon head, he has made exactly the same mistake in all three names. I can’t be bothered looking for the exact threads but when he “mocks” someones intelligence he types “educated” instead of “uneducated”.

     

     

    :good:

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by  Ge.
    1 member liked this post.
    #1123032

    Rather stay out of that and him thanks Ive actually stayed away due to that so …

    #1123033

    Obviously Morg from the first story telling posts, fancies himself as a novelist , but he never makes sense!! As Kent’s said we all knew it was him, and yes people should stop lending him tenners. He thinks he’s clever enough to fool people with the odd reference to a job 🤣

    Also, he just CANNOT RESIST typing and seeing his own name everywhere, plenty of C&P too, trying to look like it’s his words , then BANG back to barely legible English !! Lol. Deep Joy. Days and days of threads of Shit to come. 😱

    2 members liked this post.
    #1123034

    You can fool people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time. MaJics sleight of hand holds all the bullets.

    #1123036

    No, majic was also Sussed. Doh !!!

    jeeesh !!!

    1 member liked this post.
    #1123037

    Child_Ghost doesn’t need MaJic as they see all, when the spirit of darkness travels to their destination. All will be revealed as sleight of hand is not necessary, when the cards are turned over all will see the facts.

    #1123038

    Facts geez give it a rest man for god sake !!!it’s just a pathetic excuse talking about love ….do you actually know what love is 🙄🙄🙄🙄

    1 member liked this post.
    #1123039

    Thought you would have had the old geezers back, guess not. That spoke a thousand words. Your luck has ran out, watchout for bad spirits they won’t ever rest now. The fires of hell i cant stop for you now, choose the correct path. God is your saviour.

    #1123042

    Sce

    As soon as you try to define love, pigeonhole it, number it, then it’s gone. You can’t do it.

    Love is

    1. being all soppy

    2. a vapour, you’re soon through it

    3. being there for someone to the point where you haven’t woken up to the fact that you’re being used

    4. coming home from a visit to your parents to discover the man you love so truly has raped and murdered two young girls (Soham). Instead of freaking out in the most major way possible, you then help to remove all tracks of the crime and cover up for him. You then become the most despised woman in the country. Now that is LURVE

    5. giving him money whenever he needs it, even to buy condoms which somehow he never uses on you.

    6. falling in love with a nine year-old girl at first sight, and fetishising her when she died. Instead of being arrested, you write La Vita Nuova about the nature of love and become world-famous (this refers to an Italian called Dante Alighieri.

    7. write rather a lot of semi-mystical crap in jc which passes for wisdom, but really isn’t.

    These things do happen. But society as a whole has a different idea of love for the most part “what can I gain?what will I have to give up?what do I not or do comprise on?this is isn’t true love but we’re happy,better than being single” Many people go in with those as their base emotions but that’s not the way it should be at all. Those relationships contain love but it’s a comfortable one not a full one. If someone dies it’s tragic but our primary concern is relatives because that raises the risk of suicide and that’s what we know happens. But for those in love? Those couples who really do deeply love eachother, losing the other can trigger an all together different thing ,death by heartbreak. Now allowed on death certificates,sometimes as heartbreak syndrome. When one goes the others heart can’t take the pain the stress, sometimes they just stop at that point. If we can define it in medical science as heartbreak, then yes, in those cases it was a love so deep that despite you disliking the romantic ideas of it, one could not beat without the other anymore.

    Sara,

    I don’t dislike the romantic idea of love.

    I think love takes a lot of different forms, and it’s impossible to pin it down as a definition, or as a series of numbers. I gave an alternative series of numbers whihc saw love very differently.

    I’ve not said what my own experiences of love are, or what I see love to actually be. I don’t want to, certainly not here.

    I do remember a photograph of the Vietnam War, and two young children, whose parents had just been killed. The older one, about 9, was holding her younger brother (about 4) with her arms holding his shoulders,  protecting him from harm. Instinctive love. It was one of the saddest photos I’ve ever seen.

    There are many other instances of love, including things I’ve actually noticed and felt.

    You shouldn’t prejudge things, I think.

     

    1 member liked this post.
Viewing 10 posts - 51 through 60 (of 78 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!