Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › What do we know about Diana’s death?
-
AuthorPosts
-
27 June, 2006 at 1:19 pm #227150
perhaps…but if they hadnt got her one way they would have got her another.
27 June, 2006 at 1:47 pm #227151This is true……….they still havent explained why they took her past hospitals that could have given emergency treatment ………
She was still alive when they took her from the car ……………..
27 June, 2006 at 1:59 pm #227152@rossylass wrote:
This is true……….they still havent explained why they took her past hospitals that could have given emergency treatment ………
She was still alive when they took her from the car ……………..
Yes ”they” (the ambulance drivers???) knowingly took he past simply dozens of hospitals didn’t they? I guess that the emergency services must have been in on it as well. I’m only surprised that they didn’t finish her off in the ambulance – but maybe they did.
She was wearing a seatbelt, and she sustained no injuries at all in the crash. ”They” got her into the ambulance and beat her head in once she was inside. Then they drove her around a bit to make it look good and finally arrived at the furthest away hospital from the crash site.
Meanwhile back in the real world………………….
27 June, 2006 at 2:43 pm #227153Back in the real world……………. you would anwer the question factually and not with a load of loaded sarcasm……………..
Its a question that has never been satisfactorily answered…………………. but like marilyn monroe and the Kennedys…………it will remain an unanswered question in the annuals of history……………………
Just another unsolved case………………… no one wins in the end…………..
27 June, 2006 at 4:06 pm #227154@rossylass wrote:
Back in the real world……………. you would anwer the question factually and not with a load of loaded sarcasm……………..
Its a question that has never been satisfactorily answered…………………. but like marilyn monroe and the Kennedys…………it will remain an unanswered question in the annuals of history……………………
Just another unsolved case………………… no one wins in the end…………..
OK to take your point a wee bit more seriously then.
If what you suggest is true, there would have to be an enormous amount of pre-planning to pull this one off. The emergency services in Paris would have to be involved including all the ambulance drivers – as how could anybody predict with absolute certainty which ambulance would attend the crash site??? If the wrong one attended with a crew that wasn’t ”in on it” then they would simply whisk her to the nearest suitable hospital.
You claim that the ambulance (in the full view of the world’s press) deliberately and for no discernable reason drove past several hospitals that could have taken her and ended up in one some distance from the crash site.
I don’t want to scream ”Prove it” but is this something that you are simply repeating or do you happen to know which hospitals they went past and which hospital finally took her in?????
27 June, 2006 at 4:20 pm #227155I will concede the point to you PB……….
Your statement seems logical and well thought out………….so we just have to except that an exceptional woman with all her faults and foibles died tragically early in her life……….
27 June, 2006 at 4:33 pm #227156Sadly I am drawn to the inescapable conclusion that her death was accidental. By this I mean that it wasn’t the result of a carefully orchestrated plot by person or persons unknown.
I say this because the way the accident occurred was simply too public to have been staged and prepared well in advance. There were simply far too many variables that could not have been controlled with any degree of certainty.
Had it have happened on a quiet country road or similar then maybe, just maybe it could have been staged. But there she was screaming through the centre of Paris hotly pursued by several motorcycles with ‘paparazzi’ photographers on them, cars and pedestrians all over the place (even in the early hours). Too many potential witnesses, too many observers.
So no I don’t buy into Mohammed Fayed’s conspiracy theory, and no I don’t think Prince Philip did it either.
27 June, 2006 at 5:24 pm #227157@forumhostpb wrote:
But there she was screaming through the centre of Paris hotly pursued by several motorcycles with ‘paparazzi’ photographers on them, cars and pedestrians all over the place (even in the early hours). Too many potential witnesses, too many observers.
Who told you that?
27 June, 2006 at 5:34 pm #227158@emmalush wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
But there she was screaming through the centre of Paris hotly pursued by several motorcycles with ‘paparazzi’ photographers on them, cars and pedestrians all over the place (even in the early hours). Too many potential witnesses, too many observers.
Who told you that?
You clearly didn’t see any of the news bulletins at the time :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Personally, I think that it doesn’t matter how or why it happened, the only truth anyone will ever know is that it DID!!!!
I also think that the Daily Express should have an order slapped on it and make it stop with this f*ckin witch hunt!! cos thats all it amounts to, and ever will. Be it only for the sake of her two sons, who however hard they might try not to see or hear it, they’re neither of them DEAF DUMB OR BLIND!!!!!!!!!!
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!