-
Posts
-
So was she.
the thing is bout dianna is that she really did love charles as far as i know early footage of her clearly showed that she loved him…….. praps someone should be knockin his blatently obvious affairs first b4 dianna’s …….he may have been slightly more underhand than dianna but he had affair(s) never the less……..how would u feel if u were married to a person who woz quite clearly in love with someone else….dianna woz chosen to bear children and possible heirs to the throne……..she woz in my opinion badly treated……..and as far as a legacy goes we are on bout her sons………yeah yeah someone is bout to go on bout how harry is a no good beer swillin wot ever…….u know wot its good to see a young man royal family or not have some fun
an u know wot PB dont go on about wot sort of role model dianna woz………wot bout the future king of englands conduct?????
hugssssssssss xxxxx
dont mock the afflicted young tommy u mite be like it yaself one day …..dont say i didnt warn ya :roll: :lol:
hugssssssssss xxxx
This is all very well Cath. But I remember the Sunday papers on the 31st August 1997. All the front pages and the inside ”news” pages were full of the fact that she was dead and all were full of ”a nation mourns” stuff.
Problem is that all the editorial pages indside had been written during the week and couldn’t be re-written in the short space of time between her death and the papers going out onto the streets.
They were unanimous in slagging her off really really badly. They hit out at pretty much everything from her total lack of public morals, to her list of indiscretions with numerous males and so on and so forth.
It was the most wonderful example of Media gross hypocrisy that I have ever seen, and the only part of the Media that drew attention to it was Private Eye – for which they will ever be blessed.
do ya know wot???? successful people often do meet with this kind of ‘witchhunt’ mentality!! :roll:
hugssssssss xxxx
Diane was just a breedin Mare for the future of the Monarcy…. she did what she was to do… and she paid the price……(ooopss… why…!! ) not let her RIP….??
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Actually i’m as pure as the driven slush – but that’s another story.
Fact is that I am not a member of the Royal family, I’m not an internation public figure, and most important of all…………….. i only played Rugby, I didn’t shag half the England team.
So you are allowed to hide beind your anonymity. Good for you! I don’t think Dianna ever asked to have her every move scrutinised by the whole world. :? So she liked to French Connection UK? So what?
I would have. :PYour right she didnt. She did want some of her moves scrutinised, but thats where she went wrong, she didnt realise that its a two way thing.
Then she would moan about the media, the very people that gave her a much needed voice after the royals dist her.
@cath 55 wrote:
the thing is bout dianna is that she really did love charles as far as i know early footage of her clearly showed that she loved him……..
TRUE. Diana loved charles, more than he loved her.
praps someone should be knockin his blatently obvious affairs first b4 dianna’s
Charles started the affair merry-go-round.
dianna woz chosen to bear children and possible heirs to the throne……..she woz in my opinion badly treated……..
Encouraged to have sex with charles, YUK!
I think donkeys years ago, a woman wouldnt mind being used as a princess to bear babies, and they probably didnt work it out until late, and then couldnt do owt about it/not worth it.With diana, it was a whole new ball game, she knew how to manipulate the media for revenge against the royals, and you know how the media like to assist.
and as far as a legacy goes we are on bout her sons………yeah yeah someone is bout to go on bout how harry is a no good beer swillin wot ever…….u know wot its good to see a young man royal family or not have some fun
Charles, the father of harry? He certainly has his mothers fun outlook on life, but charles?
Why is it that so many people talk a load of drivel and bring her affairs up……. If Charles had been any kind of man and married the woman he has supposed to have loved for all the years…..in the first place then Diana would not have died………………..
Instead he was a wimp and married a woman chosen for the fact hat she was naive and innocent to give him an heir to the throne…………….
She is not to blame for the fact that she learnt to play the game and became a master of it to survive living with a royal family that had no feelings or emotions between them……….
So leave her memory intact and be greatful we have two lovely boys who have inherited their mothers sense of humour and tactileness into the bargain…………….
In your dreams …….. If he was so decent more people would like him…….
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!