Welcome To Britain

http://www.youtube.com/user/ExopoliticsTV#p/u/0/D4ajfVOzXfs

The above video is an update on the matters concerning ‘Church and State’ complicity in the criminal actions carried out in Canada against the native Indians under the wing of the Catholic Church and its schools. Papers have been served on both pope Ratzinger and Elizabeth Windsor. As I understand it, no response has been received in connection with the writs.

A main witness of Mr Annette, William Coombes unfortunately will not be there due to his death. An interesting article about the witness can be viewed ~
Here.

:lol: :lol: :lol: http://liberapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Queen_Elizabeth_II

You gotta laugh aint ya :lol:

Questions for Mr R. Stewart MP Penrith & Borders

The following letter was sent yesterday by one of Mr Stewart’s constituents:

Dear Mr Stewart.

Political traitors, such as Heath and Asquith walked freely till the day they died, and more recent traitors, such as Hurd, Cameron, Blair, Brown, etc. are still walking freely along the streets of England, unpunished for the hideous crimes they have indulged in.
Despite these individuals, and many, many others committing the most serious crime imaginable, High Treason, they remain, to date, unpunished.
Despite overwhelming evidence, the Police and other elements are willing to ignore these crimes.
English history is clear to read and the Law of England, English Common Law and the English Constitution is unequivocal. These criminals MUST be arrested, brought to trial and if found guilty, severely punished. The punishment for such a crime is death; to be hung by the neck until dead!

You may be interested to know, because recent evidence suggests that despite a very privileged education, your knowledge of English history is perhaps selective, that Her Majesty has the right to replace hanging to a fully public hang draw and quartering with the recipients heads displayed on spikes along London Bridge. Re: Prerogatives of the King Sir Mathew Hale.

You recently told me that “we” have no written Constitution. That is an indication of the fact that your education on this point is sadly lacking. Our Constitution is written, just not in one document. You have demonstrated your ignorance of the laws of this country by this comment. However as any Police Constable will tell you, ignorance of the law is no excuse. By demonstrating your ignorance on this subject, you have demonstrated your unsuitability to be a member of Parliament. Sir Mathew Hale and before him Sir Edward Coke both complained that those who make our laws are largely ignorant of the restraints the law puts upon their law making ability which is why they make such bad law. The Parliament in which you sit is producing the worst laws ever imposed upon a long suffering English public. But I would remind you, history tells us we do not suffer quietly for ever, we will fight to defend our rights. There is strong evidence to suggest there are many prepared to do so!.

For now I wish YOU to answer these questions. I am not asking you, I am demanding, and you as a Servant of the people WILL comply!

1. If George Osborne attended the June Bilderberg Conference in an official capacity, why does the Official Bilderberg site say that ALL participants attend in a private capacity?

2. You have stated that you attended the Bilderberg Conference in a private capacity. I have to say, I find the attendance of the conference by a very junior insignificant back bencher at Bilderberg as rather, well lets say oddl You are Mr Stewart and I am being factual here, a political pygmy. I ask myself why is it that YOU were invited? Could it be that the political elite have some covert plan for you? Well the evidence we have is that they certainly do! Recently obtained internal and highly confidential documents from the heart of No 10 would suggest that indeed you and others are here to conduct a very important task for the elitists who are indeed destroying my country!
My question. Why did you attend The Bilderberg Conference, and what did you discuss?

3. Recently you advised your constituency that you attended a meeting in Washington with the USA Government. Again I ask what is a political micron doing in attending meetings with the USA Government? Why were you there, what was your mission, what did you discuss?

4. I noted from your recent expenses claims, that you filed a claim for constituency work on the same day the Bilderberg Conference commenced. Now, I have on record that you attended the full Conference. To conduct Constituency business the morning before the Conference started would not be impossible, but just to alleviate my concerns, would you be so kind to explain fully the circumstances of this claim?

Yours sincerely,
Mr N L Green
Cumbria,
ENGLAND

ORDER . . . ORDER . . . . Session is in motion. :lol:

Roger Hayes gives his views on British Law, the article has been converted to pdf and can be read
Here (98kb)

Edited to change the link ~ the new link will show a more printer friendly version of the pdf. :)

@pepsi wrote:

Thanks Gazlan that is amazing!

:lol:

:wink:

Nayyyyyy sweat, now you can do an honourable thing -see below and pass on please.

On the 14th November, I am to stand trial at Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire on a breach of the peace charge. Due to the anticipated large number of witnesses, the proceedings are set to last for two weeks.
The terms of my defence will ensure that this trial becomes a test case, not only for the future of the freedom of the press, but also impacts on freedom of speech. I shall stand on the right of a journalist to publish what he believes to be the truth and is in the public interest. My excellent legal team, led by the eminent Frances McMenamin QC, feel that the success of my defence may be enhanced by having letters produced in Court from those who have supported my actions in bringing the Hollie Greig case into the public domain and believe my stance to be justified in the public interest
Thus, I would be most grateful to anyone who feels that they can support me in this way.

The letters must be hard copies, sent by mail, not email. To be valid, they must contain the address, name and signature of the sender and be addressed in the following manner, to enable me to forward them to my solicitor, Mr Gerry Sweeney, and then onward to be placed before the Sheriff. It should open with “To whom it may concern”
Here is the address,

The Court,
c/o Robert Green
4 Birchdale Road
Appleton
Warrington
Cheshire WA4 5AR

This issue, I believe, is of importance far beyond the parameters of the case itself. It revolves around the concept of openness versus secrecy in our society. It must now be obvious to any reasonable person following the Hollie Greig case that the degree of secrecy involving senior state officials in trying to obstruct and pervert the course of justice by making clandestine agreements behind closed doors is completely unacceptable in any civilised and democratic society.

May I thank everyone who has supported Hollie, Anne and me throughout the campaign and hope that you may be able to help in this regard. The letters do not need to be lengthy, nor particularly detailed. All that is requested is a statement that you support my position before the Court.

:)