Boards Index General discussion Getting serious Welcome To Britain

Viewing 10 posts - 61 through 70 (of 106 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #473434

    COMPLICITY !!!

    #473435


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ictjEQ0zvik

    ‘The biggest man you ever did see – was just a baby in this life’ ~ BoB

    #473436

    After some difficulty communicating with Mr Annett { heaven knows why } I came across this site and discovered that there is a potential tribunal sitting where Elizabeth Windsor and pope Ratzinger will be invited to attend. This I consider essential reading for those in particular that praise the two above in whatever form.

    Dear friends,

    As massive riots sweep London, Birmingham and Liverpool tonight, we are witnessing the outcome of years of cutbacks, enforced poverty and state-level corruption in an England tied to the repressive globalist agenda of the European Union.

    On May 29, I was jailed, finger printed and deported from London by the UK Border Agency and its private corporate partner, Reliance Ltd., for the “crime” of speaking out publicly about the proven complicity of the British Crown and the Vatican in genocide and child trafficking.

    Read All About It Here

    #473437
    #473438



    Something that actually caught my attention on the i-player.

    :o

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0146104

    #473439

    By: Roger Hayes
    [email protected]

    The people as a collective are the ultimate supremacy. Once accomplished, a constitution cannot be changed without the express will of the people – for to do so would be a violation of contract and would negate the authority of those in breech.

    Britain Has A Constitution

    Britain has a constitution of considerable standing, the foundations of which were established almost 800 years ago with the signing of Magna Carta in 1215, and reasserted 322 years go with the Declaration of Right and Bill of Rights in 1688.

    Parliament was not party to either Magna Carta or the Declaration of Right and thus has no authority to impinge upon the contract agreed i.e. our constitution. They are, however, obliged to obey its provisions. The Bill of Rights is a parliamentary affirmation of the Declaration of Right, it does not replace it or stand above it, it is merely a confirmation of it.

    If parliament breeches our constitution, it renders itself illgitimate to us, for as long as the breech remains. No breech may stand as binding upon us.

    Our constitution has been emulated by countries around the world as it is recognised as a benchmark for the protection of the people against the tyranny of rulers and errant politicians.
    The change we need

    Don’t let it be you that the youth of the future point their fingers at in blame! Be the change we know this Beautiful country is crying out for. :P

    #473440

    Seen this and thought of you Gazlan :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Four men have appeared in court in Britain charged with slavery offences relating to four people found at a travellers’ site.

    The four: Tommy Connors (30), Patrick Connors (19), James Connors (34), and James Connors (23), all with addresses at the Greenacres caravan site at Little Billington, were yesterday charged with conspiracy to hold a person in servitude and requiring them to perform forced labour.

    The four appeared in court in Luton this morning.

    The charges follow an investigation by the Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Major Crime Unit and relate to alleged offences against four men at the Greenacres travellers’ site in Bedfordshire.

    The four defendants all live at the site, in Great Billington, Leighton Buzzard, the Crown Prosecution Service said.

    A fifth person who was arrested alongside the men on Sunday morning – a heavily pregnant woman – was released on bail and will be questioned further after the birth of her child, Bedfordshire Police said.

    Last night’s charges, made by the police on the direction of the Crown Prosecution Service, cover just four of the 24 British, Polish, Latvian and Lithuanian men who were taken away by the police after Sunday’s raid. “Police investigations into other offences relating to other potential victims at Greenacres are ongoing,” said Adrian Roberts of the prosecution service.

    Nine of the 24 men taken away on Sunday have refused to co-operate with the investigation, while one of them returned to live at the site last night, saying that the police action was “ridiculous”.

    Yesterday, Travellers living at the park angrily denied that the men had been slaves, insisting they had paid them £30 a day to work laying tarmac and clearing rubble, and had given them accommodation.

    However, the accommodation was appalling, with some of the men living four-to-a-room in crowded, dilapidated caravans, while others had been seen sleeping in horseboxes and kennels by police during weeks of covert surveillance.

    The dawn raid took place on Sunday as it was the only day the men were not taken off-site to work. Police say they were forced, instead, to clean the heavily secured caravan park.

    It is understood that most of the alleged slaves are suffering from alcoholism or drug addiction. One of them came to Greenacres after he was approached by Travellers while he sat on a bridge readying to kill himself. Police say the men were promised £80 a day for work.

    Before 2010 police struggled to prosecute allegations of slavery because they were required to use anti-trafficking laws, assault or charges of false imprisonment – none of them would cover the allegations made against Greenacres.

    Under Section 71 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, a person found guilty of holding someone in domestic servitude could face up to 14 years in jail, while a conviction for forced labour brings a seven-year penalty.

    The head of Anti-Slavery International, Aidan McQuade said he believed that up to 3,000 people are enslaved in the United Kingdom at any one time: “I was shocked [by the Greenacres allegations], but I was not surprised,” he said.

    Fifteen of the released men continued yesterday to get medical treatment from the Red Cross, though it remains to be seen if they will make formal statements. Police say, however, that they are receiving co-operation.

    A successful prosecution will depend on the police being able to prove the men were ill-treated, that their movements were restricted, that they suffered poor accommodation and food and were forcibly isolated from others.

    #473441

    WoW . . . She didn’t tell me she was expectin. :lol:

    #473442

    Watched the ceremony of sending 2 fire engines to Nablus today..

    #473443


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejBc1gwHlj0&feature=player_embedded


    It really is great to see people with such stamina in the face of adversity. Barbara Tucker, the lady now carrying on with the Brian Haw peace campaign in Parliament square is free. With the sad loss of Mr Haw, this woman must be congratulated for her passion and belief in what she is doing. I think most people have had to face some very difficult times but, to imagine a campaign started ten years ago by Brian Haw, 24 hours per day, and seven days per week is still as evident as ever, is an achievement not many could or would even attempt.

    I have nothing but respect for what they are doing and the stance they now take to defend what must be a fundamental democratic right ~ The Right To Peaceful Protest.

    As has been witnessed through Brian Haw TV and other sources, the appalling treatment handed out to the campaigners over the years has not deterred the protest at all. It is obvious that things have been made increasingly more difficult for the campaigners by the obstacles put in place by the authorities yet, Barbara Tucker marches on relentlessly. Good luck to her and all at her side through this affair.

    Clearly we can see that the judiciary are under the spot light, not least the recent cases brought before the courts by Muad’Dib, Norman Scarth, Tony Farrell and various others. From the information available from the above cases, we can also see that these people are educated and informed individuals, the cases brought by them have so far ended without any repercussions adversely affecting the judiciary.

    It would appear to me as an observer, that the judiciary will sooner or later have a case to answer that will potentially call into question the very foundations of the law making establishment. As in the case of Joe Dowling here ~ http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3243689250145029015
    We can see the behaviour of the ‘law’ society is much to be desired and cannot continue to expect the people of this country to be silenced when they bring such cases highlighting the corruption.

Viewing 10 posts - 61 through 70 (of 106 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!