Boards Index › General discussion › Off topic chat › Usernames
-
AuthorPosts
-
30 August, 2008 at 8:30 am #11298
was reading one of chickenmans posts and was curious to know why he chose that name
does he like chickens?
does he look like one?
does he keep them in his back garden?
or perhaps hes an eggmanIf you are not using the name your parents gave you, why did you choose the name you did?
I chose bon bon because I’m a sweetie
30 August, 2008 at 8:56 am #367452feel free to post your theories on why other people chose their usernames
I have a few but I’m too sweet to say 8)30 August, 2008 at 10:38 am #367453I have four middle names after my christian one, although as I wasn’t actually christened, then it technically isn’t my christian name, simply my first name. Howsoever, the fourth name after my first name – which should really be known as my fifth name – is Esmeralda.
So it is a part of my actual name and not an adopted moniker.
Are you with me? Because I lost meself by the third comma. :roll:30 August, 2008 at 11:01 am #367454I’m with you
30 August, 2008 at 11:06 am #367455@bon bon wrote:
was reading one of chickenmans posts and was curious to know why he chose that name
does he like chickens?
does he look like one?
does he keep them in his back garden?
or perhaps hes an eggmanIf you are not using the name your parents gave you, why did you choose the name you did?
I chose bon bon because I’m a sweetie
At least someone reads them :lol: :lol:
I started of with a completely different name but every time i tried to reg my name it came up taken so just just keeped tweeking it until it accepted a name. That ended up as chickenman. It had nothing what so ever to do with the weirdo that was on x-factor :lol:
Chickenman was taken by a chinesse transsexual on faceparty so i use another name on the other sites i go on cus i got to many wierd messages Mind you im not on faceparty anymore cus i got booted for being to old :lol:
30 August, 2008 at 11:17 am #367456I wont bother trying to join then :?
30 August, 2008 at 12:13 pm #367457could have been worse your name could have been mad and you liked Pepsi max
30 August, 2008 at 12:31 pm #367458Sir Actor is a characterisation of someone who desperately wants to be an actor.
Stage or screen….or even village hall, he isn’t fussed.He was overlooked for a knighthood many years ago but – despite his resentment of the establishment – bought himself one from Tony Blair’s government in a hush hush move.
It’s his ambition to land a leading role on Eastenders but has so far been unsuccessful although he has played the part of a Polish street sweeper in the popular soap.
30 August, 2008 at 12:39 pm #367459Peter
Next to Jesus, Peter is probably the most important figure in the New Testament. Roman Catholics revere him as the first pope, and all Christians revere him as Jesus’s number one guy. Most biblical scholars agree that whatever the resurrection was, Peter was probably the first to recognize it and the first to spread the message to other people. If we have Jesus to thank for the message, we have Peter to thank for determining that the message was important enough to pass on after Jesus’s death.
The etymology of Peter’s name is interesting. “Peter,” as most of us familiar with biblical passages will know, was actually a nickname. His birth name was Simon – or, in Aramaic, “Shimon” (pronounced “shee-mone”). However, according to the Gospels, at some point during his ministry, Jesus gave Simon a nickname. Matthew’s gospel says that Jesus decided to call Simon “the rock” because he would be the rock upon which the church was built (thus the Roman Catholic claim to apostolic succession). This is how Simon ended up being called Peter.
The New Testament, despite describing people who were Aramaic-speaking Jews, living in Roman-controlled Palestine, was written entirely in Greek. “Peter,” then, is an English transliteration of the Greek name “Petros.” “Petros,” on the other hand, was a Greek translation of the original Aramaic nickname. In Aramaic, the word for “rock” was “keef” (again, that’s an English spelling…but it shows how the Aramaic word would have been pronounced). Thus, when Jesus decided to call Simon “the rock,” he began calling him Keepha (or Kifa, or Keefa, or any of another dozen ways you could spell it in English). The New Testament, as I said above, was written in Greek. So in a few places, the Greek writers of the New Testament transliterated “Keepha” into Greek, thus calling him “Cephas.” If you’ve ever heard of the name “Cephas” before, and wondered why that was an alternative to Peter’s name, this is why – it was a Greek transliteration of the Aramaic nickname (my grandfather had a brother named Cephas). However, in many places in the New Testament, the writers simply translated (not transliterated) the Aramaic nickname into Greek. Since “petra” is the Greek word for “rock,” they called him Petros, to denote that it was a male name. And then, from “Petros,” we transliterate it into English as “Peter.”
When you look at the etymology of this name, you begin to realize that “Peter” is probably the most nonsensical choice – historically speaking – of names to call this apostle. As illustrated above, it is a transliteration of a Greek translation of an original Aramaic nickname. It would make a lot more sense to simply call him “Petros,” using the translated Greek name that is most often used in the original language of the New Testament, call him “Keepha” in order to stick to the actual Aramaic name, or, at the very least, translate the name from Aramaic directly into English, instead of first going through Greek.
Of course, if we did that, then the father of the Catholic Church, and Jesus’s closest apostle, would be Pope Rocky.
oh and my name is Peter so i lobbed the r off
30 August, 2008 at 1:17 pm #367460I got my latest username due to the obsession of Reed and Hoseason to ban me… :lol:
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!