-
Posts
-
It’s heartbreaking to imagine if anyone I knew died but were unable to be identified. As I have got older and lost people close to me, more so in the last 9 months I hope their souls are at peace, and I say that but to be honest what does that mean? I struggle immensly when someone I know dies.
If you have nothing to hide, why would you object to being DNA tested as routine. ?
I think it’s a thing that will become a matter of course in time.
There are occasions many occasions where the relatives are unaware of the deaths and thousands of people go missing every year in all sorts of circumstances to have a body with dna is a bonus but without knowing who to match that dna too its worthless……and they may not suffer once there dead gaz but whos to say they didnt suffer during there death.
What would be intresting to know is how many people have been wrongfully accused and sentanced with dna evidence ……..and lets not forget the many cases of wrongfull imprisonment that have been solved becuase of new dna evidence proving the the person behind bars was innocent .
People suffer in all kinds of ways, if they die as a result of crime then of course they deserve justice as much as anyone. In terms of justice, the rights of the living must exceed those of the dead, although not less important…..In my opinion, one injustice to a living soul is one to many…. When we are governed by hypocrites, thieves and people who are in the pockets of the banks, to expect these people to hold any information on me with totaly sincere purpose, is something i will never subscribe to voluntarily…with every new technology there will be pro`s and cons…..the court of human rights obviously felt the weight of the scales of justice weigh heavily in favour of the right to privacy in this case….
Pheeeeeewwww !!! got away with that one….. :lol: :wink:
…..the court of human rights obviously felt the weight of the scales of justice weigh heavily in favour of the right to privacy in this case….
and of corse there never wrong !
@peggy wrote:
…..the court of human rights obviously felt the weight of the scales of justice weigh heavily in favour of the right to privacy in this case….
and of corse there never wrong !
No peggy !!!!! thats me your refering to hun…..havent you learned anything… :wink:
Yets lets ditch DNA altogether i mean there may just be 1 or maybe 2 cases where something has gone wrong … dunking stools thats the answer because obviously with DNA there’ll be more miscarraiges of justice, stands to reason
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!