Boards Index › General discussion › The locker room › TV replays
-
AuthorPosts
-
6 January, 2007 at 6:28 pm #250712
@matty wrote:
a ref decision won’t send your team down
Are you saying its impossible for a ref to make a decision that will lose a team a game?
7 January, 2007 at 6:28 pm #250713@emmalush wrote:
@matty wrote:
a ref decision won’t send your team down
Are you saying its impossible for a ref to make a decision that will lose a team a game?
i’m saying poor teams should stop complaining about the ref, and look more at there performance throughout the season, it all evens itself out, one bad decision one week can be a decision to go for you another week
people complain way too much
7 January, 2007 at 9:08 pm #250714@matty wrote:
i’m saying poor teams should stop complaining about the ref, and look more at there performance throughout the season
But refs make human errors that cost teams points. Wouldn’t it be better if other humans gave them help?
it all evens itself out
No it doesn’t. People who dont wana give refs help say this.
people complain way too much
You would if you bought something for £20 and got a bad deal.
8 January, 2007 at 1:50 am #250715if a referees decision meant a team where relegated then surely EVERY game they have played in the referee ust of gave them a bad decision that cuased them to be in the bottom part of the league?
maybe on a day a refs decision may be the cause of a team getting beat and going down but if the team where any good they wouldnt of been down there in the first place
8 January, 2007 at 1:57 pm #250716@smileysfriend wrote:
And that would stop human error????
Was the entire world wrong when they knew spurs had scored at old trafford a while back? I suggest that if the guy in the stand isnt sure about a decision, then he/she does nothing.
8 January, 2007 at 2:08 pm #250717Because humans make errors, refs, players and managers can and do contribute to a team suffering. Managers and players are constantly trying new things to improve their human errors, but we just let refs get on with it, pretending they cant be helped, madness.
WHY shouldn’t we help them??????????????????
9 January, 2007 at 8:19 am #250718football has been going for 100 years and more, it has survived pretty well so far without it, why have it now, its just another call out to take the game more commercial, leave it as a sport, don’t pish about with it
9 January, 2007 at 3:45 pm #250719@matty wrote:
football has been going for 100 years and more, it has survived pretty well so far without it, why have it now, its just another call out to take the game more commercial, leave it as a sport, don’t pish about with it
You like it the way it is, but football didnt start out with referees…humans who were involved in the game (like fifa) decided to change the way it was officiated to make the game run better, tv replays would do the same.
Give me an example of the 4th official spoiling the game?
How the hell the game could become more commercial giving refs more help, and considering the globalisation high standards its at now, wont make the slightest difference.
9 January, 2007 at 4:40 pm #250720only the teams that can afford to have hudreds of multi angled cameras at their ground would benefit from it!
sounds very lets keep the rich rich.
example here FA cup 4th round game non league team against a premier league team?
the non league team would lose out, as they woujldnt have the facilities to have the game at their own ground would they. even if tey got their seating sorted and the pitch, they would then ened to get more moeny to buy cameras and put them all over the pitch
the porr lose out on this one emma, this is a very tory idea.
i just dont see how tv replays will make it better i seriously dont, the game is good as it is! instead of replays how about sorting out the players diving first? the refs see it happen and dont do nothing about it, or maybe giving more power to the linesman or the 4th official? if they see its a dive then let them call it, they dont need to stop the whole game while someone takes a look at different angles of a video replay to get the best view on it all.
it would make the game become too slow, no momentum woujld be gained because teams wouldnt have time to build up any.
9 January, 2007 at 10:45 pm #250721@token_male wrote:
only the teams that can afford to have hudreds of multi angled cameras at their ground would benefit from it!
Hundreds?? TV would fund the cameras via the tv deals in the “professional” game.
sounds very lets keep the rich rich.
NO, it would help smaller clubs, because refs are biased to bigger supported clubs.
i just dont see how tv replays will make it better i seriously dont, the game is good as it is! instead of replays how about sorting out the players diving first?
Absolutely, so is it fairer to punish someone during the game, like sending them off for cheating, or after the game?
it would make the game become too slow, no momentum woujld be gained because teams wouldnt have time to build up any.
Scenario. Incident happens whereby the ref does not give a goal, play goes on. Within seconds, the 4th official sees the incident and tells the ref to stop the game, its a goal. Whats wrong with that?
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!