-
Posts
-
PB
It is a criminal offence for you to have sex with someone under 16 years of age.
If you are unsure, if you fancy someone that looks even 18, it must be your duty as a stand up member of your community, to find out for sure what age this person is.
Failure to do so, no matter what the circumstances are, should result in blame directed at you. Society must be protected from individuals who do not understand the importance of protecting children.
If you dont understand this simple concept, i suggest you seek medical help.
It’s actually quite easy to find out the correct age of females
DNA type kits are available – accurate to within 2 months of ageI have some of these kits for sale – results are “next day”
Please forward cheques or PO’s for £7,500 + vat to Drivel
alternatively you could just saw one of their legs off and count the rings :lol:
Seriously tho, theres a HELL of a difference between a girl in her teens who is sexually active and PROACTIVELY gagging for it and someone 10 or below who is coerced
Calling having sex with a WILLING participant rape is just a teensy bit silly sensationalism at best and idiotic warblings of people for whom reality is a small dot dissapearing rapidly over their mental horizon at worst
The important issue here should within some bounds be the aspect of consent, whether someone was coerced and tricked, manipulated or even forced into having sex OR whether they were totally willing and eager to bump uglies or were even the instigator of the rogering of their slime chute
A good start would be to make the way underaged sex if viewed for BOTH genders, because underaged sex with a male “child” is treated far less seriously and ISNT classed as mandatory rape based solely on age, and we ARE supposed to be treating both sexes EQUALLY after all innit? Or does that only apply when its the kind of equality that favours the titty transporters? :lol: :lol:
Perhaps we should even be looking at why so many of our teenage girls are cock hopping little dick junkies from such an early age? Because if no teenage girls WANTED to have sex that would eradicate the problem pretty much at source anyway
But as with so many other things based purely on gender an EQUALLY willing woman is the victim and based solely on gender the male is the bad guy lol
Wel”cum” to post modern feminist society peeps :lol:
Actually drivel, you could just use the trout tunnel test
You screw her for half an hour then wait for another half an hour then screw her again#
If she is as tight as she was the first time then she’s pretty low mileage, if not then shes had a good few years of repeated ramrodding (lets assume 4 years for arguements sake)
So nowadays with four years worth of repeated shagging she would be about 17 give or take lol, but if she is just as tight as the first time theres a good chance shes under 17 so THEN you know its best NOT to shag her :D
(admittedly that approach totally lacks any form of scientific validity AND is severely flawed logically, but its a far more fun approach :wink: :lol: )
Anyway, its a well known sort of fact that most of the judiciary and police force are kiddy fiddling perverted sex beasts (not as bad as catholic priests tho), so I’m surprised so many people ARE suprised by this :lol:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!