-
Posts
-
The one where people who have lived together for a while can then rip the one with the most stuff off as tho they were married?
For or against?
I personally think its a bit of a rotting snail carcus really, unless the couples will be having the assets they enter the relationship with assessed and THEN only divide anything extra gained after that point divided it just opens the door for more penis hopping freeloaders who make to make a living out of being divorced to be able to do the same without even needing to get married
More if not most couples nowadays are people who couldnt manage or be bothered to make a previous relationship or marriage work, their relationship skills and track record already show they have little to no concept of what relationships are about. So a relationship formed by to failures isnt likely to fair that well either which is born out by the figures already collected
Much of the time one person will be arriving in that situation without a pot to piddle in, no career or job and someone elses b’satrd offspring in tow so they dont really contribute anything except regular sex as the person will already have been living perfectly adequately on their own but where kids are also there they WILL be adding a financial drain rather than addition
So to then let that person exit the relationship a couple of years later taking a share of it with them is ridiculous
Each person should leave with what they entered with, anything extra should be divided IF it can be proven the other person contributed in anyway to it being bought
Also, if someone spends years paying for kids that arent theirs being raised what about when THEY split up? Surely that person should then be able to claim back half the money they paid out on kids that werent theirs if this kind of nonsense policy is being introduced, why not have an EQUAL nonsense policy rather than one that just favours titty transporters??
So as you can see I’m still as yet undecided and sitting on the fence over this one :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It’s not really a moral question of marraige vs. co-habiting, more a matter of proof of a partnership. If a co-habiting couple split up there can often be dispute about the actual closeness or duration of the partnership. With married couples or gay civil partners, at least it is known that there was an agreed partnership – with that agreed they are then free to squabble over everything else! With co habitees – especially if they are childless – one partner can turn round and say they were never really a partnership anyway.
See, in principle I agree “something” should be in place, but as with marriage or whatever the gay variant is called there should be some registration of it otherwise why on earth should it be recognised anyway?
But the law as it is was created in a time when people married quite young usually moving out from their parents homes for the first time and built everything they had TOGETHER
Nowadays most couples formed and a large percentage of marriages are where 1 or 2 relationship failures, quitters or cheaters as well as widows and people who failed for other reasons are getting together
As such each enters with a proven track record of employment and earning potention, some enter with financial drains (kids and maintenance payments) and some enter with assets whilst others enter with zero income, zero work potential and zero assets
So even for marriage its time that this was factored in, so that what each person enters into their soon to fail dalliance with is noted so that each gets that back when it ends, anything left over is ALL that should then be considered dividing up along with which any financial drains should also be considered such as kids or payments to ex’s etc as well as the financial input into the relationship
That way a simple balancing of input to what was taken out by each person can be sorted out to figure out if they are owed or owe the other person
Unfortunately that method wouldnt discriminate against anyone on the grounds of gender so the feminists wouldnt like it and therefore niether would the feminist ass kissing poiliticians
Oh well :lol:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!