Boards Index General discussion Getting serious the plot thickens………………

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 118 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #322522

    Sian is absolutely correct. In order that these horrible pictures can be produced in the first place – a child has to be abused by an adult.

    Mind you I am not totally certain which is worse – doing it to an innocent child or doing it AND taking pictures to show others.

    It’s not just pictures of naked children that is the issue here – as if it was, DOA is correct and loads of “art” would have to be classified as paedophilia – it is adults performing unspeakable acts, for their sexual gratification, with innocent children.

    #322523

    Snobs! I dont care if she has sixteen children by twelve fathers, if that child is cared for properly then class is not an issue. If the child is fed, watered and clothed properly i dont care how intelligent the family is. Of course this story is not of the ordinary. I strongly believe that Shannon (Note not Sharon :wink: ) was taken in by her Uncle due to her being too upset to go home. Who would want to go home to a man which stores child porn on their computer. Did her Uncle point the police in the right direction for a more lenient sentence. (Lets face it – he’s going down no matter what he thinks).

    As someone has said already, if Shannon was in trouble and he knew it – why didnt he just contact the police to put her in care? But then again is that what Shannon wants? Wouldn’t a young girl just want her Mummy back even if it means going back to him? Oh and at that age who knows if she felt she had a strong enough voice to tell her Mum that the step-dad/kiddy fiddler from hell made her feel awkward – please get rid of him. Her mum loves him so why would she be believed. Of course adults would know better…its a childs eye view we have to take.

    #322524

    @rainbowbrite wrote:

    Snobs! I dont care if she has sixteen children by twelve fathers, if that child is cared for properly then class is not an issue. If the child is fed, watered and clothed properly i dont care how intelligent the family is. Of course this story is not of the ordinary. I strongly believe that Shannon (Note not Sharon :wink: ) was taken in by her Uncle due to her being too upset to go home. Who would want to go home to a man which stores child cuddles and hugs on their computer. Did her Uncle point the police in the right direction for a more lenient sentence. (Lets face it – he’s going down no matter what he thinks).

    As someone has said already, if Shannon was in trouble and he knew it – why didnt he just contact the police to put her in care? But then again is that what Shannon wants? Wouldn’t a young girl just want her Mummy back even if it means going back to him? Oh and at that age who knows if she felt she had a strong enough voice to tell her Mum that the step-dad/kiddy fiddler from hell made her feel awkward – please get rid of him. Her mum loves him so why would she be believed. Of course adults would know better…its a childs eye view we have to take.

    I’m guessing the girl didnt know he had Child Porn on his comp, so I doubt this was the reason for her not wanting to go home.

    I’d also imagine it’s standard procedure in this type of case to take Computers to look for leads, so I doubt anyone would have had to point anyone in the right direction.

    #322525

    @*Sian wrote:

    @dead_on_arrvial wrote:

    Well cath I think there a big differents between down loading pictures and the dirty sods that hang around in chatrooms looking for kids to “meet “ .

    Actvily seeking out children for s ex is far worst than looking at a few pictures.

    If we was to start banning all pictures of naked chilren we would have to close down most of our churchs and make a few changes to our grave yards.

    PB is right about removing files from your computers, its not simple, that’s why you always have to take out your hard drive on your computer before you throw it always and smash it up with a hammer.

    But I still can’t understand why Craig Meehan just didn’t do more to cover this tracts once the police were involed. No one is that dumb, the police don’t just pop round in 5 mins after a child has gone missing and go thru the house, he had plenty of time to removed anything that shouldn’t have been on this computer.

    Has for Miss Matthews, she is just one of the many people in life who spend their days doing nothing and living off the state.

    I know PB may find this hard to beleave, but there are many people like Miss Mattews using this site, picking up with younger men and doing the same thing.

    “Attractive is something we don’t do, easy and drunk we do well.”

    Is Craig Meehan a victim of this plot too? Why did a 17 year old move into a house with a women twice this age?

    I have a nasty feeling this case is far from over and we will see more family members being arrested soon, my money is on Miss Matthews.


    There isn’t any difference between them!!!! Children have to be subjected to abuse to provide those pictures! I have never heard anything so fucked up in my life!! FUCKNUT!!!

    =D> =D> =D> =D>

    #322526

    @Bad Manners wrote:

    @rainbowbrite wrote:

    Snobs! I dont care if she has sixteen children by twelve fathers, if that child is cared for properly then class is not an issue. If the child is fed, watered and clothed properly i dont care how intelligent the family is. Of course this story is not of the ordinary. I strongly believe that Shannon (Note not Sharon :wink: ) was taken in by her Uncle due to her being too upset to go home. Who would want to go home to a man which stores child cuddles and hugs on their computer. Did her Uncle point the police in the right direction for a more lenient sentence. (Lets face it – he’s going down no matter what he thinks).

    As someone has said already, if Shannon was in trouble and he knew it – why didnt he just contact the police to put her in care? But then again is that what Shannon wants? Wouldn’t a young girl just want her Mummy back even if it means going back to him? Oh and at that age who knows if she felt she had a strong enough voice to tell her Mum that the step-dad/kiddy fiddler from hell made her feel awkward – please get rid of him. Her mum loves him so why would she be believed. Of course adults would know better…its a childs eye view we have to take.

    I’m guessing the girl didnt know he had Child cuddles and hugs on his comp, so I doubt this was the reason for her not wanting to go home.

    I’d also imagine it’s standard procedure in this type of case to take Computers to look for leads, so I doubt anyone would have had to point anyone in the right direction.

    Sorry i should have made it clearer or elaborated on that. If he has those images on his computer and enjoys such things in life then could be capable of other things such as (what was reported) being accused of hitting Shannon. A possible uneasy feeling when around him perhaps?

    #322527

    Child cuddles and hugs????

    Is that a JC Board translation for something relating to p aedo philes.

    Perhaps not the most appropriate translation under these circumstances.

    #322528

    @rainbowbrite wrote:

    Sorry i should have made it clearer or elaborated on that. If he has those images on his computer and enjoys such things in life then could be capable of other things such as (what was reported) being accused of hitting Shannon. A possible uneasy feeling when around him perhaps?

    I agree. If he gets off on nude or por.nographic images of children, nothing can be ruled out at this stage. He had full access to a house full of children for a number of years. At times he must have been left alone with them, bathed them and seen them naked. I cant see how someone who is into child por.n could just switch his feelings on and off between images on a screen and real life children. It makes me shudder to think what he may have done, or was capable of doing.

    I cant see how someone can say that “just because he’s into viewing images it doesnt mean he would actually abuse a child himself.”

    Why doesnt it?

    Thats like someone saying that a man who actively seeks out images of women being raped, ie this is what gets him off, wouldnt if the opportunity presented itself actually rape a woman. The likely hood is that if they thought they might get away with it, they would.

    #322529

    @rainbowbrite wrote:

    @Bad Manners wrote:

    @rainbowbrite wrote:

    Snobs! I dont care if she has sixteen children by twelve fathers, if that child is cared for properly then class is not an issue. If the child is fed, watered and clothed properly i dont care how intelligent the family is. Of course this story is not of the ordinary. I strongly believe that Shannon (Note not Sharon :wink: ) was taken in by her Uncle due to her being too upset to go home. Who would want to go home to a man which stores child cuddles and hugs on their computer. Did her Uncle point the police in the right direction for a more lenient sentence. (Lets face it – he’s going down no matter what he thinks).

    As someone has said already, if Shannon was in trouble and he knew it – why didnt he just contact the police to put her in care? But then again is that what Shannon wants? Wouldn’t a young girl just want her Mummy back even if it means going back to him? Oh and at that age who knows if she felt she had a strong enough voice to tell her Mum that the step-dad/kiddy fiddler from hell made her feel awkward – please get rid of him. Her mum loves him so why would she be believed. Of course adults would know better…its a childs eye view we have to take.

    I’m guessing the girl didnt know he had Child cuddles and hugs on his comp, so I doubt this was the reason for her not wanting to go home.

    I’d also imagine it’s standard procedure in this type of case to take Computers to look for leads, so I doubt anyone would have had to point anyone in the right direction.

    Sorry i should have made it clearer or elaborated on that. If he has those images on his computer and enjoys such things in life then could be capable of other things such as (what was reported) being accused of hitting Shannon. A possible uneasy feeling when around him perhaps?

    I hardly see the connection with hitting a child and child por nography, but i do agree if he had child po rn on his comp then those poor kids had to have been put through some serious sh!t to get the images and ok so it doesnt necessarily mean he would go out and do these things but in looking at these images he is condoning others abusing kids, so lock the fecker up for that alone.

    #322530

    @minim wrote:

    Child cuddles and hugs????

    Is that a JC Board translation for something relating to p aedo philes.

    Perhaps not the most appropriate translation under these circumstances.

    Sorry if there has been a misunderstanding Minim. The obscenity filter changes the word “porn” or “pornography to “porn”.

    This is to undermine automatic spammers who would otherwise infest the Boards with their unsavoury messages.

    It is an unintended consequence that the term “child porn” becomes “child porn”

    #322531

    @(f)politics? wrote:

    I hardly see the connection with hitting a child and child por nography, but i do agree if he had child po rn on his comp then those poor kids had to have been put through some serious sh!t to get the images and ok so it doesnt necessarily mean he would go out and do these things but in looking at these images he is condoning others abusing kids, so lock the fecker up for that alone.

    I think that it is fair to say that adults who are prepared to find these pictures in the first place …. and then download then and save them to their hard disks are clearly utterly despicable – to put it mildly.

    No ”normal” person would want to even glance at such pictures … much less download quantities of them and save them – presumably for repeat viewing. I suspect that 99% oof the population would be utterly disgusted and appalled at this sort of thing.

    The allegation is that this unsavoury individual had hundreds of such pictures on his computer, whilst living in a home with young children present, and this surely MUST present a clear and present danger to their safety and wellbeing.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 118 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!