Viewing 10 posts - 201 through 210 (of 262 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #495539

    words,
    I understand your frustration, and I also agree wht you that panda has made some very good points.

    All II am trying to say is that they are getting away with one of the oldest political tricks in the book. They make it personal, they throw slights and insults at you, and eventually you’ll respond so that debate is cheapened.

    Tell them to play the ball, not the man, and get back to the main political points.

    Otherwise, the good points made by yourself and panda are wasted.

    #495540

    @terry wrote:

    @panda12 wrote:

    @terry wrote:

    @panda12 wrote:

    Tut! Grammar Terry! Surely you shouldn’t be ending a sentence with the word “to?” :shock:

    Surely your sentence should have read:

    Never mind the word “racism” Wordsworth; how about the word “stupidity” to which you singlehandedly, seem to have given a whole new meaning.

    I love prepositions in the same way that you love a big mac and fries luv x

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OLxLK_R6jQ

    LOL ok, I confess to the fries but I don’t eat meat so you’re wrong on the big mac.

    If you want to argue about grammar might I suggest you actually do a bit more research on the subject . Or maybe you could phone a friend.

    Oh dear! Seems I’m getting to you.

    May I politely remind you, that it was YOU that started the whole correct grammar issue on here. However, like most of your ilk, you can dish the criticism out but you can’t accept it back.

    Time to calm down, Tel boy. Why don’t you look at a nice picture to chill out to?

    https://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?t=26318

    #495541

    @sceptical guy wrote:

    words,
    I understand your frustration, and I also agree wht you that panda has made some very good points.

    All II am trying to say is that they are getting away with one of the oldest political tricks in the book. They make it personal, they throw slights and insults at you, and eventually you’ll respond so that debate is cheapened.

    Tell them to play the ball, not the man, and get back to the main political points.

    Otherwise, the good points made by yourself and panda are wasted.

    Well said, but I’ve made my points in response to Kenty’s original post, and the thread in general, but they’ve been ignored.

    It’s far easier for some to take my one comment out of context and twist it.

    #495542

    who is they ?? i have seen a few personal insults thrown around this thread from all sides
    like i said debate the topic not the author is the way forward

    #495543

    @panda12 wrote:

    Oh dear! Seems I’m getting to you.

    Hmm.

    “Oh dear! It seems as though I’m getting to you” is a better way of saying it.

    Actually, you’ll only start getting to me when it gets to match point. You haven’t even come close to winning a set yet. :wink:

    #495544

    Ah well Kenty, nice try at getting a discussion going…

    #495545

    @(f)politics? wrote:

    who is they ?? i have seen a few personal insults thrown around this thread from all sides
    like i said debate the topic not the author is the way forward

    Do you mean the author of the topic as in the person who started the thread?

    #495546

    @jen_jen wrote:

    Ah well Kenty, nice try at getting a discussion going…

    sorry

    #495547

    @kent f OBE wrote:

    @jen_jen wrote:

    Ah well Kenty, nice try at getting a discussion going…

    sorry

    It’s your fault Kenty!

    #495548

    @terry wrote:

    @kent f OBE wrote:

    @jen_jen wrote:

    Ah well Kenty, nice try at getting a discussion going…

    sorry

    It’s your fault Kenty!

    sorry again then

Viewing 10 posts - 201 through 210 (of 262 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!