The Death of a Nation

everybody will have own views on  politics.  nations are defined by the people within.  comment on Powell is point of view. he was probably before his time. even his ‘racist’  comment on rivers of blood over immigration proved  almost prophetic ( policemans head almost severed to be used as a  football etc)   freedom to move  is not a right as such.  all areas in world are ‘owned’ by somebody or a collection of  people ( called governments)  though  one may in an idealistic  world think one ought to be able to wander  anywhere around globe doing as we wish. reality is  different due to rules we adhere to (  well most of us) .  one has no more right  pitch up a tent in somebodies garden than one does to move into  another country to suit oneself in most cases .  current world trends  are  altering this at moment  with EU seemingly intent of removing any ‘ownership’  rights and  saying  all must share etc.  community ? socialism? etc  even communism has point of view one may or may not agree with but all things change given time.  It may even seem at odds that such ideas as nation are being set aside to  get a ‘bigger’  ( nation?)  community of  countries.  economics of  each area (or country) can be destroyed or raised by  ‘free’ movement of  people.  such are the difficulties of modern world.  conflict occurring as normal where  different ideals. religions etc meet  and have opposing views.   high population levels as always being base for most  issues but no  real way of  checking  growth or dealing with it  has arisen as  nearly all modern  world economics is based on such. ( called growth)   can we but hope that in time a more suitable way forward can be arrived at that  meets say halfway .  compromise often being resolution of  many issues.