Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 59 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1020171

    A question for the Op… If a man making billions from business deals owning numerous hotels, leisure complexes becoming President of the United states of America with over 60 million votes is a “chump” what the hell does that make some lonely lad called sceptical guy on an internet chatroom?

    An answer for roody poody – what he had was daddy’s money and a big mouth. He juts out his chin like Mussolini, coz he has a very large jaw. he uses his size to dominate a scene. He has the money for advisers to bail him out of trouble. His talents are for bullying on a major scale – any other talents are hidden. A ‘puss-grabbing’ pig who calls Mexicans rapists and imitates people with a form of palsy. Sir Philip Green and his mentor – Cap’n Bob Maxwell – if anyone remembers him, are/were similarly successful. You go in, cream off the savings off your workers and/or customers, and then you sail off laughing. Chump has spent a lot of his life paying off people who are after him on court cases. Jeez, if it’s success you want, then elect Sylvester Stallone or Dirty Duterte. They’ll get things done. Actually, the resemblance between Dirty Duterte and Chump is scary. His economic programme is for a major sugar infusion into the economy – a trillion dollars. Will taste really sweet for a time, before the sugar starts biting into the system’s innards in as damaging a way as it would yours. And the wish-fantasy that he’s going to bail the UK out with a trade deal? Dream on. listen to what he says, not what you want him to say. His inaugural made it clear – America First and America Only. Everyone else will eat dirt.

    so he became president because he had money? … money he earned himself as he went bankrupt which has already been alluded to. If money is the be all and end all why isn’t Bill Gates president? You do realise that Hilarys campaign cost 50% more than  Trumps campaign to fund but keep droning on with the crap lol.

    I was wondering how long it would take you to descend to the ” he calls all mexicans rapi.sts” comment when he said he wishes to curb immigration to stop mexican ra.pists coming into the states which is perfectly reasonable but as usual, hysterical politically correct clowns twist it into ” he said mexicans are ra.pists” so must be racist. You aren’t particularly bright and people are sick of these distorted hysterical comments over perfectly reasonable comments which is why the likes of Trump and Brexit happened. I haven’t a clue who “dirty duterte” is btw unless it’s a mirror enroute to the bathroom prematurely fouling yourself again frothing in the mouth in rage at your left wing utopia being ripped apart. First Brexit , now trump poor lad.. not going too well is it?

    #1020176

    Some people get easily too optimistic to the point of not working in small ways incase someone helps, and they also don’t stop unless people prove that they don’t want something by actually doing something about it. Rapists, for example, assume the girl wants it too because she’s not being unpleasant until she physically proves that she doesn’t want him. I think the Democratic Party is legit, organically, it has always had people in that party. It’s just that maybe people don’t want more pessimists ruling just because typically bad things happen when everyone is a pessimist and doesn’t believe there is a good natural organic future. People don’t give dogs more pillows to destroy because anger with weird reasons are not validated. An action is valid only if a decision, thought process and comprehensive facts from all sides are presented and everyone votes on it. Means matter more than the end, and usually everyone agrees with that when they know more. People value freedoms more than pessimism, so no one should suffer other than what people choose and what happens naturally. Helpful information and good intentions should always prevail rather than silence and hate disguised as tough love. You can always say you hate something or someone, but you can’t do something about it. Rejection is beautiful and commercials make people less stubborn. Trolls will be better off being busy making money and gardens for their people than being criminals.

    #1020183

    Some people get easily too optimistic to the point of not working in small ways incase someone helps, and they also don’t stop unless people prove that they don’t want something by actually doing something about it. Rapists, for example, assume the girl wants it too because she’s not being unpleasant until she physically proves that she doesn’t want him. I think the Democratic Party is legit, organically, it has always had people in that party. It’s just that maybe people don’t want more pessimists ruling just because typically bad things happen when everyone is a pessimist and doesn’t believe there is a good natural organic future. People don’t give dogs more pillows to destroy because anger with weird reasons are not validated. An action is valid only if a decision, thought process and comprehensive facts from all sides are presented and everyone votes on it. Means matter more than the end, and usually everyone agrees with that when they know more. People value freedoms more than pessimism, so no one should suffer other than what people choose and what happens naturally. Helpful information and good intentions should always prevail rather than silence and hate disguised as tough love. You can always say you hate something or someone, but you can’t do something about it. Rejection is beautiful and commercials make people less stubborn. Trolls will be better off being busy making money and gardens for their people than being criminals.

     

    Right…too clever for me, most of that

     

    I’m not a rapist, Mexican or otherwise, so I don’t know that the rapist thinks the woman wants it.

    How do you know??

     

    just asking

    #1020184

    Still hasn’t affected me  :unsure:

    #1020187
    What he had was daddy’s money and a big mouth. He juts out his chin like Mussolini, coz he has a very large jaw. he uses his size to dominate a scene. He has the money for advisers to bail him out of trouble. His talents are for bullying on a major scale – any other talents are hidden. A ‘puss-grabbing’ pig who calls Mexicans rapists and imitates people with a form of palsy. Sir Philip Green and his mentor – Cap’n Bob Maxwell – if anyone remembers him, are/were similarly successful. You go in, cream off the savings off your workers and/or customers, and then you sail off laughing. Chump has spent a lot of his life paying off people who are after him on court cases. Jeez, if it’s success you want, then elect Sylvester Stallone or Dirty Duterte. They’ll get things done. Actually, the resemblance between Dirty Duterte and Chump is scary. His economic programme is for a major sugar infusion into the economy – a trillion dollars. Will taste really sweet for a time, before the sugar starts biting into the system’s innards in as damaging a way as it would yours. And the wish-fantasy that he’s going to bail the UK out with a trade deal? Dream on. listen to what he says, not what you want him to say. His inaugural made it clear – America First and America Only. Everyone else will eat dirt.

    so he became president because he had money? … money he earned himself as he went bankrupt which has already been alluded to. If money is the be all and end all why isn’t Bill Gates president? You do realise that Hilarys campaign cost 50% more than Trumps campaign to fund but keep droning on with the crap lol. I was wondering how long it would take you to descend to the ” he calls all mexicans rapi.sts” comment when he said he wishes to curb immigration to stop mexican ra.pists coming into the states which is perfectly reasonable but as usual, hysterical politically correct clowns twist it into ” he said mexicans are ra.pists” so must be racist. You aren’t particularly bright and people are sick of these distorted hysterical comments over perfectly reasonable comments which is why the likes of Trump and Brexit happened. I haven’t a clue who “dirty duterte” is btw unless it’s a mirror enroute to the bathroom prematurely fouling yourself again frothing in the mouth in rage at your left wing utopia being ripped apart. First Brexit , now trump poor lad.. not going too well is it?

    Well, Roody,

    Dirty Duterte is the President of the Philippines. Look him up.

    Chump used twitter and talked off the top of his head, a bit like you. If he had a big mouth, and no money, he would have got nowhere.

    He expressed the mean prejudices of a lot of people who felt left out. Hillary was the worst possible candidate to run. The fact that she was defeated by Trump shows that money alone can’t do it. She was as disliked as he was. He’s taking office as the least popular President at this time of term ever. Let’s hope we all survive him – he’s a walking obscenity.

     

    #1020188

    I haven’t a clue what you are wittering on about, but you sound slightly backwards fella and extremely disturbed. He won the election so won the ” democratic process”.. vote count is irrelevant as it’s based on the electoral college system which is something you are clearly too intrinsically stupid to grasp. If typing “roody poody” gets you excited fair enough, but you just confirm what an absolute tool you are and illustrate your lack of both intellect and education coupled with ignorance regarding the political setup in the states.

    Well, read things properly, roody. He was constitutionally elected, not democratically elected. There’s a difference in the USA.

    The constitutional founders made sure that the system wasn’t democratic – they were frightened of democracy. When democracy came  in the early 19C, they retained the electoral college system. The president is constitutionally elected by 538 people, I believe, and Chump won it constitutionally. In democratic terms, he lost by 3 million votes. So it goes. There have been constant attempts to end the electoral system and make the election a democratic system – the last one was in 1969 after the big vote for George Wallace, but it failed (for good reasons).

    So Chump was elected constitutionally, not democratically. Check it out, oh man wiht blinders on.

     

    No, things are not going good at the moment. The present crop of authoritarian Rightists are on the move, and where they end who knows? Let’s hope they don’t cause too much hurt on the way.

    #1020190

    Still hasn’t affected me :unsure:

    Oh dear, Pete, give him time.

    He’s only been in one day.

    Even Rome wasn’t destroyed in a day

    #1020191

    I am sure the world will survive, but will draculina? She has a big mouth, and California is not happy about Trump. I hope she keeps it shut for a couple of weeks..

    It wasn’t public knowlage that i’m in California, lol :wacko:

    #1020193

    I created a thread about the motivations of one of the anti-Trump protest movements, I guess it is relevant to this thread.

    Regarding his election, I don’t like the electoral colege and I think it should have been abolished after the civil war concluded and centralised power in the federal government, it is the system currently used in the US. So Trump is the legitimate president. If the election was based on the popular vote then he would have had a different campaign strategy and could have still won.

    #1020194

    People wont take anyone serious once you start using a condescending tone or name calling! Soooo grow ups boys or let up er?   The internet has a reputation for harbouring know-it-alls.  Even my old school friends on Facebook all seem to swell with confidence in their understanding of exactly how the world works. Part of this phenomenon is the tendency to then confuse what we really know in our personal memories, with what we have easy access to, the knowledge that is readily available at our fingertips. We have the illusion that all this information at our fingertips is really in our heads. the internet is giving new fuel to the way we’ve always thought. It can be both a cause of overconfidence,  when we mistake the boundary between what we know and what is available to us over the web.

    The point of a political conversation is not to assert your opinion, its to share it! Democracy, am I right guys? Whether or not we see eye to eye is not the point. People spend more time focused on explaining why ur right instead of  contemplating why you (in fact) might  be wrong. Finally, what use is there to political opinions if they never change? :unsure:

     

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 59 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!