Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › The cheek of it.
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 August, 2008 at 4:26 pm #11094
Reading the local paper yesterday, and a man who was convicted for breaking into someone’s house claims that it was THEIR FAULT as they had left their window open!
It’s like being caught shoplifting at Tesco’s and claiming that it’s Tesco’s fault as they shouldn’t have put the stuff out on the shelf.
On a serious note though, whilst he was in the house, the occupiers were upstairs fast asleep, and the man stated that if confronted he’d have fought back.
Frightening thought, especially if there were children there!!
10 August, 2008 at 5:01 pm #361251years ago we lived in a well dodgy area and I used to sleep with a knife under the matress.
No doubt if I had ever had to use it, the crime would have been mine.
Its my worse nightmare waking up and finding a burglar in the house. It happened to one of my other halfs friends and she pretended to be asleep. She had a heart attack the next day, poor woman.
10 August, 2008 at 5:34 pm #361252One of my neighbours took a photo from his house of a man letting his dog mess on the pavement.
The guy with the dog saw he was having his picture taken and reported it to the police who are now investigating the incident as a breach of dogman’s Human Rights.and, as if that wasn’t enough,
the council have told him they can’t use the photograph as evidence against dogman because it hadn’t been taken by one of their employees.
That’s a cheek.
10 August, 2008 at 5:53 pm #361253@woohoo wrote:
Reading the local paper yesterday, and a man who was convicted for breaking into someone’s house claims that it was THEIR FAULT as they had left their window open!
It’s like being caught shoplifting at Tesco’s and claiming that it’s Tesco’s fault as they shouldn’t have put the stuff out on the shelf.
There is an argument that as supermarkets display their goods in such a manner as to entice the shopper to part with more of his/her money than intended, then they ARE tempting the sticky fingered to acquire items without..er..paying.
This is in no way an attempt to assuage the guilt of a misspent youth, trawling the aisles of Safeway for slabs of chocolate and little tins of baby pudding (banana was best) to shove up a jumper when one should have been at school doing something tedious like PE. :oops:10 August, 2008 at 6:30 pm #361254@sir Actor wrote:
One of my neighbours took a photo from his house of a man letting his dog mess on the pavement.
The guy with the dog saw he was having his picture taken and reported it to the police who are now investigating the incident as a breach of dogman’s Human Rights.and, as if that wasn’t enough,
the council have told him they can’t use the photograph as evidence against dogman because it hadn’t been taken by one of their employees.
That’s a cheek.
No it’s not, it’s the law.
10 August, 2008 at 6:35 pm #361255@johnboy25 wrote:
@sir Actor wrote:
One of my neighbours took a photo from his house of a man letting his dog mess on the pavement.
The guy with the dog saw he was having his picture taken and reported it to the police who are now investigating the incident as a breach of dogman’s Human Rights.and, as if that wasn’t enough,
the council have told him they can’t use the photograph as evidence against dogman because it hadn’t been taken by one of their employees.
That’s a cheek.
No it’s not, it’s the law.
The Human Rights Act was Blair’s law.
Like Blair himself it has no place in civilised society.
Only the politically correct would bother to defend it – the rest of the country want it changed.If you filmed somebody being stabbed it would not be admissable in court under this law.
Criminals and their lawyers have had it their way for far too long.10 August, 2008 at 10:00 pm #361256A simple ‘Yes, you’re right’ would have done. No need to get hissy. And btw, if I filmed someone being stabbed I’d be a sick freak.
10 August, 2008 at 10:23 pm #361257@woohoo wrote:
Reading the local paper yesterday, and a man who was convicted for breaking into someone’s house claims that it was THEIR FAULT as they had left their window open!
It’s like being caught shoplifting at Tesco’s and claiming that it’s Tesco’s fault as they shouldn’t have put the stuff out on the shelf.
On a serious note though, whilst he was in the house, the occupiers were upstairs fast asleep, and the man stated that if confronted he’d have fought back.
Frightening thought, especially if there were children there!!
Woohoo
Scrotes use any excuse to try and get off- this made me chuckle but he was convicted- seems the jury saw him for a fu/ckwit too
10 August, 2008 at 10:28 pm #361258Apparently the householder was asked how did he know the accused was an intruder .. cause he came intruder window m’lord he replied
10 August, 2008 at 10:46 pm #361259always get the escaping burglar to turn around before you let rip with the shotgun
I’m serious………
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!