Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Terror alert?
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 August, 2006 at 11:00 pm #234615
police have contacts in all communities… underground, gangs, muslims extremist etc…
better to have contact than no contact
where is the problem?
as it appears our authorities did a fantastic job today.
if BNP had been in power would the budget have been the same after paying to ship everbody out… would we have had the resources we had today?
what is the BNPs proposal’s to the current budget…. how much of a percentage of the publics money would they give to our security services?
would our services have had the resources to respond as quickly as they did today or would they be too busy pacing the towns for illegals/assylum seekers still here after being paid to go home (with our money)
10 August, 2006 at 11:30 pm #234616@sharongooner wrote:
police have contacts in all communities… underground, gangs, muslims extremist etc…
better to have contact than no contact
where is the problem?Yes better to have contacts. No contacts with non muslims meant chaos at airports.
as it appears our authorities did a fantastic job today.
It appears we only have their side of the story, and we know from history that they are not very trustworthy with terror opinions.
if BNP had been in power would the budget have been the same after paying to ship everbody out… would we have had the resources we had today?
We’d have a wealth of budget by not wasting taxes on asylum seekers, letting jobs go abroad, importing job seekers from abroad, fighting illegal wars etc etc
what is the BNPs proposal’s to the current budget…. how much of a percentage of the publics money would they give to our security services?
I dont know the ins n outs :D ask them. I would say a fair amount to defend our borders. I dont suppose islamic idiots would wana live under a BNP government.
You have a choice, you can either have mass immigration which will produce factions of hatred (muslims at the moment, could be christians in 20 years time) who will kill, or you can have limited immigration like 30 years ago, when no islamic terror occured.
Who goes, you decide :wink:
10 August, 2006 at 11:52 pm #234617@emmalush wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
I dont know the ins n outs :D ask them.
im confused…. in your previous posts you reply when asked about bnp and what the opinion is as “our” and “we”
when i ask an important question re cash flow its suddenly dunno ask them…..
im beginning to wonder Em!!!!!! :wink:
11 August, 2006 at 12:10 am #234618All important. Some things you know, some you dont, thats life. I then atleast gave you my honest opinion of what i expect is the case.
What would you rather have, mass immigration whereby being human, we dont always get along and terror occurs, or limited immigration which reduces it?
11 August, 2006 at 12:16 am #234619id rather be comfortable and know the government in power has the resources to always cope with it. even if they dont live here, we will always be a target and security has to be resourceful
just wondered thats all, what the bnp had in plan for when they are in power with regards resources for the security services
you have to know the WHOLE picture, not just bits
11 August, 2006 at 12:30 am #234620@sharongooner wrote:
id rather be comfortable and know the government in power has the resources to always cope with it. even if they dont live here, we will always be a target and security has to be resourceful
Always? What about 7/7, they couldn’t cope, more than 50 people died, hundreds injured.
If we didnt attack british muslim brothers abroad, they wouldn’t attack us. The BNp dont want this war, bring our troops home, NOW!!
just wondered thats all, what the bnp had in plan for when they are in power with regards resources for the security services
Even the most dangerous of evil would think very carefully if the BNP controlled our borders. As it is, most people coming here dont even get asked for there passport, never mind whats in their suitcases.
you have to know the WHOLE picture, not just bits
Absolutely, well said. And only then can we know what is the right thing to do. Its about educating ourselves. Finding out what goes on behind the tv screen, what your local council get upto (which the BNP has made somewhat of a priority, to expose the lib-lab-con nonsense of meetings to work out when council meetings should take place, farcical). Which commercial companies support certain political parties, and why, and how does it affect our daily lives.
Are you prepared to WANT to know?
11 August, 2006 at 2:23 am #234621@alan Symers wrote:
i say well done to our forces for putting a stop to what could have been a nasty event. i was going to the shop when i heard this on my car radio it came on right after an advert about coldseal windows
PB’s gonna get you for this! 8-[
11 August, 2006 at 7:12 am #234622@Magoo wrote:
Good grief, why try and show you for what you are, when you do a perfectly good job by yourself, you don’t need my help.
I think the mainstay of your most refreshing posts;
‘hang them’
‘deport them’
‘hate them’
‘all terrorists’
‘scum’, etc., etc., etc., yawnwithout actually stating any point that provokes thought… make you most interesting and original… not. So I shall leave you to your mindless, pointless, yobbish rants ‘Kevin the teenager’.
As for people PM’ing you, you actually make a great point without even realising it! I’ve known for four years about the cowards and weasles that hide behind PM’s networking with people, telling them to hate me and whatever else they need to get across in their extremely sad lives. But whenever it is confirmed, it just highlights how desperate some people can be. But hey, they’ve been doing it for four years and I’m still here. Sadly I know who most of them are, don’t I perve, because in their desperation they usually end up telling the wrong people.
Anyway carry on ranting Dribble.
not me lol i tell ya to ye face gooey lol…….. :wink: :wink: mornin drivel lol
11 August, 2006 at 7:46 am #234623@slayer wrote:
@drivel wrote:
Do you honestly think they are trying to blow up our planes because we are in Iraq .
If it wasn’t iraq they would have another excuse – perhaps a cartoon in a newspaper or whatever
These people are terrorist scum – they hate the West – full stop If they are found to be British citizens – then why were they let in in the first place, and more to the point being a British citizen should mean supporting Britain not fighting itThe 20% or whatever muslims in this country that support the tube bombers and other terrorists should be deported immediately – somewhere nice and peaceful like Lebanon – along with their families
Funny how we always disagree on Iraq isn’t it!
The alledged planned attacks on flights to the US was not because we are in Iraq HOWEVER what Iraq has done is to provide a focus, an energy and an outlet for disillusioned Muslims and extremists to use to demonstrate the West’s disregard for Muslim life over their own.
The current situation in Lebanon has a tally of about 65 Israeli’s dead and over 700 Lebanese and the West sit back and play ping pong with the phrase “ceasefire”- if this situation was in reverse, you’d probably be seeing the 4th,5th and 6th US Airborne landing in the Bekaa Valley and Schwarzekopf coming out of retirement to save the day. But it serves to show that a Muslim life appears to be worth less than a Christian/Jewish one.
Yes, maybe they would use another excuse for terror if we weren;t in Iraq, but what Iraq makes so much harder is for us, or moderate Muslims, to take a high moral ground.
Terror is evil, no matter where is finds its way and committed by whoever but that doesn’t mean you can’t seek to understand what causes people to want to blow themselves up at 37,000 feet along with 450 other souls
You say we disagree ; yet you have agreed with most of what I said . although you are a lot more sympathetic than I .
Thank you anyway for a moderate response – unlike the failed Polytechnic student Magoo , who reverts to silly name calling .I must admit that although I have always been Pro-jew – I am starting to think they are being for to parochial in Lebanon and if it’s starting to sway me , then I’m sure a lot pf people are having 2nd thoughts
The BIG thing here is the NON-United Nations ; how the feck will anyone take them on board as a viable alternative to the USA when they are taking weeks to put an agreement on paper – while in the meantime 100’s if not 1000’s of innocent people are getting killed .
Which is my argument against the UN , by the time they decide to do anything it is invariably too late .11 August, 2006 at 12:13 pm #234624It’s gonna be a long, long time before any War on Terrorism is won. In the coming years there will more plots, and more Muslims passing on their hatred of the West to their children, who in turn will take up the fight.
The basic problem is the Wests policies in the Middle East. Until something is sorted about those policies we could fighting this war for 25 years+ -
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!