Strange happenings in Bridgend

And still it cant but help itself reply to me.

@sharongooner wrote:

I dont think it really matters does it?

We know all Essys posts are cool as are Wasps… we dont all agree all the time do we?

Argue with the points made not the person making them 8)

well said pet. perhaps bullying was the wrong phrase, mabey snobbery is more like it :lol: :lol: :lol: dont take it personally im just being nice for a change, it wont last for long ill be pmt,ing all over the place in a day or so. :lol: :lol: :lol:

@esmeralda wrote:

Thanks for your robust defence, Ruby. You’re my darling girl.
Li’l fek. I edited. I EDITED. And I EDITED for two reasons. One: Though it was an excellent article, it veered into a long-wind with the cogent references being scattered unevenly throughout. I sliced and tidied..rather effectively if I say so meself. Two: The Herald doesn’t permit posting and copying and I was buggered if I was going to let this get in the way of sharing what was in essence a relevant contribution to the debate.
You’re an obsessive wee oddity, Fek, your own contributions broach neither wit nor whimsy. Now do us all a favour and go take a big fat flying f.uck to your wee self!

No need to justify yourself or to be abusive.
Any kind of writer would be fed up with others not giving them credit. I guess you can’t see that, so let’s move on.

“Glad you’ve got the ego for it Beeker as good stand up is an art form that requires communicatory skills in addition to a funny script. In a previous life I wrote comedy for various shows on the Beeb and was considered amongst the top ten percent amongst my peers. I loved writing gags and sketches..and could sometimes barely write them down as I was rolling about laughing so much. The mark of a good piece of comedy was that it still made me laugh on the fifth or sixth inspection. Better yet..I got to see it performed and payed a cheque for it. The downside was that it was easy to have a lot of work pinched..for every gag I actually got acknowledged/paid for..another was ‘appropriated’ and I eventually couldn’t be @rsed with it anymore..and moved on.”

https://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?t=11158&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0%5B/b%5D

@lil fek wrote:

@esmeralda wrote:

Thanks for your robust defence, Ruby. You’re my darling girl.
Li’l fek. I edited. I EDITED. And I EDITED for two reasons. One: Though it was an excellent article, it veered into a long-wind with the cogent references being scattered unevenly throughout. I sliced and tidied..rather effectively if I say so meself. Two: The Herald doesn’t permit posting and copying and I was buggered if I was going to let this get in the way of sharing what was in essence a relevant contribution to the debate.
You’re an obsessive wee oddity, Fek, your own contributions broach neither wit nor whimsy. Now do us all a favour and go take a big fat flying f.uck to your wee self!

No need to justify yourself or to be abusive.
Any kind of writer would be fed up with others not giving them credit. I guess you can’t see that, so let’s move on.

“Glad you’ve got the ego for it Beeker as good stand up is an art form that requires communicatory skills in addition to a funny script. In a previous life I wrote comedy for various shows on the Beeb and was considered amongst the top ten percent amongst my peers. I loved writing gags and sketches..and could sometimes barely write them down as I was rolling about laughing so much. The mark of a good piece of comedy was that it still made me laugh on the fifth or sixth inspection. Better yet..I got to see it performed and payed a cheque for it. The downside was that it was easy to have a lot of work pinched..for every gag I actually got acknowledged/paid for..another was ‘appropriated’ and I eventually couldn’t be @rsed with it anymore..and moved on.”

https://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?t=11158&postdays=0&postorder=asc&sta

rt=0[/b]

OOh that was a nice wee reminder of my early days here at JC. Thanks, l’il fekker. Let me reiterate for bears of little brain. I edited, scythed, copied and pasted an article from a newspaper because great tracts of it posited a valuable contribution to the debate on the Bridgend suicides.
I did NOT laud it as a piece of journalistic effort on MY part. From the statistics quoted, it was self-evident to anyone with an iota of common sense, that it was – as most articles here are – sourced from those privy to the relevant facts and figures. To have pinpointed the author would have been to have headlined my swiping from a newspaper which does not approve. Do you need this spelled out for you in neon lights? How stupid are you?
You evidently have some kind of agenda going here, fek ( to track down an old post of mine dating back to when I joined here in 2006 shows more than a slightly unhealthy obsession) either that or you ARE mentally deficient. Aspergers or autism perhaps? Whatever – get over your quasi-moralistic posturing and get back in your padded cell.

I’m also thinking of taking out a double-spread advert in The Daily Moron, Shazza, in addition to trawling the highways and byways with a megaphone.
That’s if I have any time left over from writing out a thousand times (with a quill and ink) “I must not swipe newspaper articles coz Li’l Fek ends up on extra lithium.” :P