Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › South Africa rapist trap
-
AuthorPosts
-
7 October, 2007 at 5:26 pm #288430
With such a high incidence of HIV in South Africa… what effect will this device have on the transfer of this virus? I hope the device just clamps itself on and doesn’t draw blood!
7 October, 2007 at 5:52 pm #288431@minim wrote:
With such a high incidence of HIV in South Africa… what effect will this device have on the transfer of this virus? I hope the device just clamps itself on and doesn’t draw blood!
As much or as little as the media wants us to think it will have seeing as there has never been a single recorded and proven case of aids being “caught” by anyone and never once has any labratory found the virus itself no matter how “infected” a person is
So perhaps the question is really “I wonder how much more a virus that cant be detected, have its existence verified or even be known to be passed from person to person can spread” lol
The only scientifically known way a person can without any shadow of a doubt catch aids is by having treatment for HIV for 2-3 years and then even a non diagnosed HIV case no matter how healthy WOULD with 100% certainty have aids
7 October, 2007 at 5:58 pm #288432Earth calling Ubermik… Earth calling Ubermik
7 October, 2007 at 6:10 pm #288433@minim wrote:
Earth calling Ubermik… Earth calling Ubermik
LOL, dont take my word for it, try googling it and see if you can prove me wrong
Bet ya cant find a single accepted and medically proven instance of aids being transmitted as a virus or a single non disputed culture of the aids virus anywhere in any medical journal even tho any virus is easily detectable in any person who has the virus
The aids virus however has never once been identified in anyway, which is why all aids tests dont check for a virus, merely for protein markers in blood swabs
7 October, 2007 at 10:27 pm #288434@minim wrote:
With such a high incidence of HIV in South Africa… what effect will this device have on the transfer of this virus? I hope the device just clamps itself on and doesn’t draw blood!
I would’ve thought that the possibility of it being able to draw blood would have been looked into prior to the device being on the market, afterall, preventing the spread of HIV is probably one of the reasons it was invented in the first place
7 October, 2007 at 10:49 pm #288435@~Pebbles~ wrote:
@minim wrote:
With such a high incidence of HIV in South Africa… what effect will this device have on the transfer of this virus? I hope the device just clamps itself on and doesn’t draw blood!
I would’ve thought that the possibility of it being able to draw blood would have been looked into prior to the device being on the market, afterall, preventing the spread of HIV is probably one of the reasons it was invented in the first place
If you want to draw blood you need a red felt, crayon or biro :lol:
7 October, 2007 at 10:51 pm #288436@ubermik wrote:
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
@minim wrote:
With such a high incidence of HIV in South Africa… what effect will this device have on the transfer of this virus? I hope the device just clamps itself on and doesn’t draw blood!
I would’ve thought that the possibility of it being able to draw blood would have been looked into prior to the device being on the market, afterall, preventing the spread of HIV is probably one of the reasons it was invented in the first place
If you want to draw blood you need a red felt, crayon or biro :lol:
lmao@uber
8 October, 2007 at 10:13 am #288437@sharongooner wrote:
Anybody seen that movie, cant remember what its called with Charliez Theron playing the murderer on death row for killing?
Cor blimey if there was ever a deterent that woman is it! (she even looked like her in the movie and put weight on to play her).
What was the bloody films name and main character??? This is gonna bug me now. :twisted:
The name just came to me “Monster” it was Eileen something the real life person.
the film is called monster based on real events and murders the poor cowin real lifehad been raped by her three cousins for years before she went off the tracks, the woman had a lousy life as a drunk and a drug addict, [not that this is an excuse for her behaviour] she deserved the death sentence. but who was to blame realy.???
ps wasnt charlise thieron fantastic in the part. :o -
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!