so they finally catch up with OJ Simpson?

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

:roll: Here on Planet Earth there was 24hr coverage of the trial, evidence and all.

Media coverage – where you’ve obviously got your information from – is infamously biased.
The jury would not have been allowed access to it for that reason alone.
Show me one bit of evidence that would’ve convinced the jury he was guilty.

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

:roll: Here on Planet Earth there was 24hr coverage of the trial, evidence and all.

Media coverage – where you’ve obviously got your information from – is infamously biased.
The jury would not have been allowed access to it for that reason alone.
Show me one bit of evidence that would’ve convinced the jury he was guilty.

Only way OJ Simpson could have been innocent is if you believe the Evidence was planted by the Police.

I would say the Evidence is overwhelming.

http://www.justicejunction.com/judicial_injustice_oj_evidence_rockingham.htm

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

Nothing to do with mean Media Coverage? It was live in the Courtroom.

You said the coverage was 24/7.
Do you mean the media coverage or are you saying the trial itself was a 24 hour, 7 days a week live event?

Every second of it was televised yes.

You look at that page, and tell me honestly that you dont think there was any evidence. If you say no then your :^o will grow.

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@Bad Manners wrote:

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial.

Please feel free to elaborate.

I’ve served on jury service – twice – and I don’t ever recall evidence from those trials being made public.

:roll: Here on Planet Earth there was 24hr coverage of the trial, evidence and all.

Media coverage – where you’ve obviously got your information from – is infamously biased.
The jury would not have been allowed access to it for that reason alone.
Show me one bit of evidence that would’ve convinced the jury he was guilty.

Only way OJ Simpson could have been innocent is if you believe the Evidence was planted by the Police.

I would say the Evidence is overwhelming.

http://www.justicejunction.com/judicial_injustice_oj_evidence_rockingham.htm

A conspiracy theory?

By someone who presents – to all intents and purposes – the same argument the prosecution would have presented to the jury.