so they finally catch up with OJ Simpson?

@sir Actor wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

He,s got evil black eyes. Lock him up and chuck the key away.

Judge him not by the colour of his eyes, but by the content of his character :lol:

How about judging him on the evidence? :roll:

Or is that asking too much…..

How about getting a sense of humour? :roll:

Or is that asking too much…..

How about you get off your high horse? :lol:

Taking the moral highground with me achieves sweet FA

I am glad a jury has found him guily of something at long last. He got away with murder, plain and simple.
He is being done for Kidnapping amoungst other things, so with a bit of luck, he will have life and decent human beings will be safe again

@johnboy25 wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

How about you get off your high horse? :lol:

Taking the moral highground with me achieves sweet FA

Can you not understand that I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in your “humour” or your well-worn cliches?

Try sticking to the topic for a change.

Sorry, I thought you mentioned it. Obviously my mistake, you wouldn’t have done that if you didn’t care.

And what exactly has this got to do with the topic that you’re so keen to stick to?

Try thinking before you speak, you’re falling all over yourself with those comments.

I’m not speaking…I’m typing.

And I’m not falling over either.
Your opinions on the topic (not on me) would be interesting to read if you actually bothered to make some.

My point of view is this;
The first time he stood trial a jury found him not guilty.
That verdict was based on the evidence put before them.

It’s all very well and clever for people to make comments on here proclaiming his guilt in the murder of his wife but where was the evidence?

This is the whole point of the judicial system in that you are innocent until proven guilty.

@sir Actor wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

@sir Actor wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

How about you get off your high horse? :lol:

Taking the moral highground with me achieves sweet FA

Can you not understand that I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in your “humour” or your well-worn cliches?

Try sticking to the topic for a change.

Sorry, I thought you mentioned it. Obviously my mistake, you wouldn’t have done that if you didn’t care.

And what exactly has this got to do with the topic that you’re so keen to stick to?

Try thinking before you speak, you’re falling all over yourself with those comments.

I’m not speaking…I’m typing.

And I’m not falling over either.
Your opinions on the topic (not on me) would be interesting to read if you actually bothered to make some.

My point of view is this;
The first time he stood trial a jury found him not guilty.
That verdict was based on the evidence put before them.

It’s all very well and clever for people to make comments on here proclaiming his guilt in the murder of his wife but where was the evidence?

This is the whole point of the judicial system in that you are innocent until proven guilty.

I would say there was a lot of evidence in the Murder Trial, but it wasnt long after the Rodney King incident, and feelings were still running high from that. Black Jury Members swung it for him.

I’ve defended other people on here in the past, but I wouldn’t defend OJ. He seems arrogant, and instead of keeping his head down, he writes a ludricrous book “If I did It”, and adds more pain to the victims families.

Plus his acting in the Naked Gun was totally shocking.