Boards Index › General discussion › Off topic chat › So has Tommy left then?
-
AuthorPosts
-
30 June, 2006 at 4:06 pm #228954
@fastcars wrote:
I think Tommy will be back Catz…. :|
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: chickennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.
30 June, 2006 at 4:10 pm #22895530 June, 2006 at 4:17 pm #22895630 June, 2006 at 5:29 pm #228957WHAT IS GOING ON?!?! :shock: :shock: :!: :!: :!:
30 June, 2006 at 6:26 pm #228958@Beatty Blue wrote:
WHAT IS GOING ON?!?! :shock: :shock: :!: :!: :!:
Read the thread in Serious topics started by magoo, and see last post by Tommy
30 June, 2006 at 7:22 pm #228959@*Sian* wrote:
I think Tommy and Geoff are paid to get the clicks up :lol:
good thinkin sian……hmmmmmmm :-k :-k :-
hugssssssss xxxx
30 June, 2006 at 9:01 pm #228960Oh Dear! Tommy posted a topic that had a subtle message a la Brass Eye and nobody got it. Great idea, perhaps a little overstated for the audience – the sort of post that SHOULD have had all those who were initially shocked saying “Oh NOW I get it…tut tut Tommy, that was very naughty” but instead incurred the wrath of Geoff and all hell broke loose. I have no doubt Cath and Rubes were shocked and outraged but I assume they got the ‘joke’ eventually, even if they didn’t appreciate it.
Was it crude – Maybe. Was it controversial – Yes (until you saw the joke – which TT had to explain to the nth degree to make sure even the morons and those who’se eyes were clouded by red mist got it). Was it too clever by far for this mwahhh, lol, rofl, brb, wb, change a letter, read my shyte poem audience – YES. Should Tommy have got his knuckles rapped – Probably, but it WAS a joke.
Magoo obviously got the joke but leapt on the chance to crucify TT as he has been waiting for this opportunity for years. Geoff could never understand why PB took a shine to TT and TT could never understand why PB had taken a shine to Geoff. So Geoff aired his ‘moralistic’ and (entirely fabricated) christian opinions knowing that he would get support from ‘outraged of JC’ and sat back and laughed whilst Tommy got kicked in the teeth.
Why is everyone so shocked at Tommy’s paedophile ‘play on words’? The Chat Rooms are crammed to the rafters with REAL paedophiles and perverts (as any female chatter who leaves pc’s enabled can testify) and yet nothing is done to clear them out. Where is Magoos thread complaining about paedophiles in F2 and F3 and demanding the resignation of the Moderators?
Tommy, to my certain knowledge, has done more than ANYONE to rid this site of paedophile scum and I can assure you that he will be sorely missed, as much as a guardian of the chat rooms as a wind-up merchant (and a frequent pain in the @rse) on the boards.
Still, I suppose Magoo will fill Tommy’s ‘thread-starter’ slot and bring a new, vibrant, moralistic outlook to the Boards. There may even be plans to make Geoff a moderator, who knows? (You can hang around to see Geoff’s next move in JC or you can join his own exciting site now if you can’t bear the suspense).
This should have nipped this in the bud from the beginning. Small tut @ Tommy for not gauging the reaction of the audience. Bigger tuts @ those who jumped on the bandwagon and shame on moderators for not jumping on Geoff.
Latest Score: Geoff 1 JC 0
So long Tommy – lang may yer lum reek!
30 June, 2006 at 10:04 pm #228961@james Belfast wrote:
Oh Dear! Tommy posted a topic that had a subtle message a la Brass Eye and nobody got it. Great idea, perhaps a little overstated for the audience – the sort of post that SHOULD have had all those who were initially shocked saying “Oh NOW I get it…tut tut Tommy, that was very naughty” but instead incurred the wrath of Geoff and all hell broke loose. I have no doubt Cath and Rubes were shocked and outraged but I assume they got the ‘joke’ eventually, even if they didn’t appreciate it.
Was it crude – Maybe. Was it controversial – Yes (until you saw the joke – which TT had to explain to the nth degree to make sure even the morons and those who’se eyes were clouded by red mist got it). Was it too clever by far for this mwahh, lol, rofl, brb, wb, change a letter, read my shyte poem audience – YES. Should Tommy have got his knuckles rapped – Probably, but it WAS a joke.
Magoo obviously got the joke but leapt on the chance to crucify TT as he has been waiting for this opportunity for years. Geoff could never understand why PB took a shine to TT and TT could never understand why PB had taken a shine to Geoff. So Geoff aired his ‘moralistic’ and (entirely fabricated) christian opinions knowing that he would get support from ‘outraged of JC’ and sat back and laughed whilst Tommy got kicked in the teeth.
Why is everyone so shocked at Tommy’s paedophile ‘play on words’? The Chat Rooms are crammed to the rafters with REAL paedophiles and perverts (as any female chatter who leaves pc’s enabled can testify) and yet nothing is done to clear them out. Where is Magoos thread complaining about paedophiles in F2 and F3 and demanding the resignation of the Moderators?
Tommy, to my certain knowledge, has done more than ANYONE to rid this site of paedophile scum and I can assure you that he will be sorely missed, as much as a guardian of the chat rooms as a wind-up merchant (and a frequent pain in the @rse) on the boards.
Still, I suppose Magoo will fill Tommy’s ‘thread-starter’ slot and bring a new, vibrant, moralistic outlook to the Boards. There may even be plans to make Geoff a moderator, who knows? (You can hang around to see Geoff’s next move in JC or you can join his own exciting site now if you can’t bear the suspense).
This should have nipped this in the bud from the beginning. Small tut @ Tommy for not gauging the reaction of the audience. Bigger tuts @ those who jumped on the bandwagon and shame on moderators for not jumping on Geoff.
Latest Score: Geoff 1 JC 0
So long Tommy – lang may yer lum reek!
=D> =D> =D>
30 June, 2006 at 10:40 pm #228962:lol: Careful there, Jimmy. You’ll be getting yourself added to Fester’s list if you’re not careful.
1 July, 2006 at 12:33 am #228963James Belfast wrote:Oh Dear! Tommy posted a topic that had a subtle message a la Brass Eye and nobody got it. Great idea, perhaps a little overstated for the audience – the sort of post that SHOULD have had all those who were initially shocked saying “Oh NOW I get it…tut tut Tommy, that was very naughty” but instead incurred the wrath of Geoff and all hell broke loose. I have no doubt Cath and Rubes were shocked and outraged but I assume they got the ‘joke’ eventually, even if they didn’t appreciate it.Was it crude – Maybe. Was it controversial – Yes (until you saw the joke – which TT had to explain to the nth degree to make sure even the morons and those who’se eyes were clouded by red mist got it). Was it too clever by far for this mwahh, lol, rofl, brb, wb, change a letter, read my shyte poem audience – YES. Should Tommy have got his knuckles rapped – Probably, but it WAS a joke.
Magoo obviously got the joke but leapt on the chance to crucify TT as he has been waiting for this opportunity for years. Geoff could never understand why PB took a shine to TT and TT could never understand why PB had taken a shine to Geoff. So Geoff aired his ‘moralistic’ and (entirely fabricated) christian opinions knowing that he would get support from ‘outraged of JC’ and sat back and laughed whilst Tommy got kicked in the teeth.
Why is everyone so shocked at Tommy’s paedophile ‘play on words’? The Chat Rooms are crammed to the rafters with REAL paedophiles and perverts (as any female chatter who leaves pc’s enabled can testify) and yet nothing is done to clear them out. Where is Magoos thread complaining about paedophiles in F2 and F3 and demanding the resignation of the Moderators?
Tommy, to my certain knowledge, has done more than ANYONE to rid this site of paedophile scum and I can assure you that he will be sorely missed, as much as a guardian of the chat rooms as a wind-up merchant (and a frequent pain in the @rse) on the boards.
Still, I suppose Magoo will fill Tommy’s ‘thread-starter’ slot and bring a new, vibrant, moralistic outlook to the Boards. There may even be plans to make Geoff a moderator, who knows? (You can hang around to see Geoff’s next move in JC or you can join his own exciting site now if you can’t bear the suspense).
This should have nipped this in the bud from the beginning. Small tut @ Tommy for not gauging the reaction of the audience. Bigger tuts @ those who jumped on the bandwagon and shame on moderators for not jumping on Geoff.
James i resent the fact that you are judging my reaction to this…..i found it offensive joke or not , i reported to the moderators i had found it extremely offensive , james this , on reflection, was said maybe tongue in cheek but tommy did know what he was doing when he posted it , he knew it would ‘stir’ some people up. However, joke or not the innuendos and the way it was written to me was not funny. James i dont know where you get off judging my reaction, you know nothing about me.
I feel that there should be contraversial people on the boards, clever enough and witty enough to make people think, to stir a reaction, otherwise it would be like reading the peoples friend…….but , and this is a big but, i also feel that subjects such as the one that tommy ‘joked’ about is unnaceptable.
I watched with a certain amount of disquiet to the holy row that followed……..it has caused at least one of our female members to leave for a while……..i for one hope she will return……..
James, I found this post offensive, i also found that the ensuing posts distastefull too….the almighty row that followed, the insults, the name calling uneccesary. People were saying that Tommy was young, yes they are right, but, these people then went on to prove how infantile they could be.
The whole thing has gotten completely out of hand, and i did in fact pm Tommy to try and ‘build bridges’, i was met with a barrage of abuse…….still undeterred i would like tommy to return to the boards once he has calmed down, hopefully with a slight understanding at least of why this went down so badly.
and just for the record James i didn’t get the joke, it was in my opinion poor taste.
in fact your sentence (Why is everyone so shocked at Tommy’s paedophile ‘play on words’? ) says it all really………
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!