Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Smoking or non smoking?
-
AuthorPosts
-
31 January, 2007 at 6:26 am #258220
@geoff wrote:
@jelly tot wrote:
Anyone who wants to smoke should give up the right to NHS treatment same goes for fat basta*ds. If you want to kill yourself then fine but don’t expect me to pay for it.
Dumb arse, without smokers you would have two scenarios;
1) The NHS collapses through the loss of revenue gained through smokers.
2) Non smokers are penalised for the influx of those that have seen the light and give up the weed. Because YOU will have to pay for the shortfall in tax revenues gained through smokers.
Think before you bore me.
Listen to you Mr. an*ly retentive.
Who says the tax on tobacco goes into the NHS budget?????
I reckon you must be in the fat git range.
Blo*dy know it all.
31 January, 2007 at 12:26 pm #258221@emmalush wrote:
Sharon makes great points, as usual. The tax raised through the sale of tobacco products continues to be a major source of revenue for the Government, contributing around £10 billion annually. This is, according to the Treasury, equivalent to almost 3 pence on the basic rate of income tax or 12 pence on the top rate of income tax.
http://www.the-tma.org.uk/page.aspx?page_id=10This poxy government keep drilling into us about choice, well they aint giving folk the choice to smoke, its no, no and NO, you do as we say.
Its a dangerous move, smokers will vote against them, but of course, the ban is after the may local elections…
Classic catch 22- ban smoking and lose revenue but long term gain through less people in hospital due to smoking related diseases- there isn’t a right answer for this one
Sharon- have to disagree- everyone has rights etc and everyone will die but ever seen anyone cough their lungs up (i mean literally, huge chunks of bloody organ) in the last stages of lung cancer- n guess what, when you’re young, n fit and think you can take on the world, you don’t believe it’ll ever happen to you- when your in your 60’s n mortality looms n you get the call from the GP saying, “sorry, Mrs Gooner but Im afraid the tests have come back n it’s lung cancer”- I can categorically guarrantee, you will dread your death with a fear and passion you didnt think possible and you will wish, every single day, that you hadnt smoked.
But as you say, its your right to die in a fashion that, were you an animal you would have been put down long before the end
31 January, 2007 at 12:50 pm #258222OK, i am a non smoker and i hate smoke!!! BUT i do like the new law of smoking being banned but feel sorry in a way for smokers who are in a pub have a few beers and want a ciggie. I have never smoked but i know a fair few smokers and some social smokers who have a few drinks and want to smoke. I will just like to go out anywhere meal,pub etc and not have to go home stinking of smoke. I think its a good idea and m kids dont have to endure smoke anywhere (not pubs they dont go in them before anyone says). But in the cafes as you walk out of a super market the smoke flies at your face and is awful.
31 January, 2007 at 7:46 pm #258223It’s probably been said before but if a company today tried to market a brand new, never heard of before product called a cigarette, it would be considered a Class A drug n banned n the company would be closed down.
Banning smoking in a public place is right and proper
31 January, 2007 at 8:06 pm #258224@slayer wrote:
Banning smoking in a public place is right and proper
No its not, who are you to say a public house should ban smoking?
You just dont believe in individual choice, you are a communistic dictator who believes we should all walk the same steps as the person infront.
31 January, 2007 at 8:48 pm #258225@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Banning smoking in a public place is right and proper
No its not, who are you to say a public house should ban smoking?
You just dont believe in individual choice, you are a communistic dictator who believes we should all walk the same steps as the person infront.
I’m not anyone to say smoking should be banned, the government have already done it. I support it- n don’t quote individual choice at me
If I chose to take a gun n spread the brains of 20 people across the high street pavement- is that alright because it was my individual choice to do so?
Individual choice is about responsibility- anarchy is about choice without responsibility
31 January, 2007 at 9:18 pm #258226@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Banning smoking in a public place is right and proper
No its not, who are you to say a public house should ban smoking?
You just dont believe in individual choice, you are a communistic dictator who believes we should all walk the same steps as the person infront.
It’s got nothing to do with being a dictator, I think the NHS has better things to spend it’s money on.
Same with obese people, those who ride motorbikes those who binge drink etc. etc. the list is endless.
31 January, 2007 at 10:01 pm #258227@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Sharon makes great points, as usual. The tax raised through the sale of tobacco products continues to be a major source of revenue for the Government, contributing around £10 billion annually. This is, according to the Treasury, equivalent to almost 3 pence on the basic rate of income tax or 12 pence on the top rate of income tax.
http://www.the-tma.org.uk/page.aspx?page_id=10This poxy government keep drilling into us about choice, well they aint giving folk the choice to smoke, its no, no and NO, you do as we say.
Its a dangerous move, smokers will vote against them, but of course, the ban is after the may local elections…
Classic catch 22- ban smoking and lose revenue but long term gain through less people in hospital due to smoking related diseases- there isn’t a right answer for this one
Sharon- have to disagree- everyone has rights etc and everyone will die but ever seen anyone cough their lungs up (i mean literally, huge chunks of bloody organ) in the last stages of lung cancer- n guess what, when you’re young, n fit and think you can take on the world, you don’t believe it’ll ever happen to you- when your in your 60’s n mortality looms n you get the call from the GP saying, “sorry, Mrs Gooner but Im afraid the tests have come back n it’s lung cancer”- I can categorically guarrantee, you will dread your death with a fear and passion you didnt think possible and you will wish, every single day, that you hadnt smoked.
But as you say, its your right to die in a fashion that, were you an animal you would have been put down long before the end
I watched my father in law die from it 4 years ago in an nhs bed. He had messed himself and there were no nurses available to change him and give him some dignity in his final hours. The last 48 hours of his life were something I would hate to see again. If he had a plug attached to him that I could have flicked off I would have done it, sod the consequences.
He never smoked.
My Grandad died of lung cancer.
He never smoked.
You get whatever life deals you, I dont think you can change that, but I understand what you are saying.
Got to go………………. we just scored!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 February, 2007 at 12:17 am #258228@slayer wrote:
I’m not anyone to say smoking should be banned, the government have already done it. I support it– n don’t quote individual choice at me
Individual choice is about responsibility- anarchy is about choice without responsibility
You want it banned, thats why you support it. Its responsible for a government to allow public places to have their own smoking policy.
1 February, 2007 at 12:19 am #258229 -
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!