What an amusing post, i love the comment about the ‘site terms’ being ripped apart by a 1st year law student’s when there not on the p1ss which is very likely :D. The mans got a point actually. But although no real major test cases have been brought up in the uk (or european community now oops ) regarding the requirement of seeking legal action of chatsites for things like commenting on other users odour or all those many many ‘im gonna find you for calling me a cyber fat cow etc etc’ :oops:. But ….. The ISP ‘liability laws’ are much more researched and what their responsibility are, anyone can research the defamation laws / innocent dissemination clauses etc im not pasteing endless drivel.
In conclusion…
The management think there very comfortable thinking they have all their bases covered i personaly think jc is great and never had a problem with admin/hosts who are always happy to help…
but in the near future a legal challenge will be mounted theres no doubt about that, where that leaves chatsites who no’s .
Ill add aswell seen as this is my first post for about a year :D
In the last 6 odd months theres seems to be alot of the new chatguides that i think are causing alot of problems in the chatrooms maybe its not intentional abuse or harrassment just a lack of training or moderation from the hosts, who are never seen acting on the complaints that they recieve about the guide disputed.
I find it amusing aswell in this post when its been said that ‘how can you sue another user without knowing their geographical location etc.. lol beleive me it can be done more easier than you think ;)
MT1