Viewing 7 posts - 11 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #247816

    I did hear on one news channel that this pervert had been on justchat but got too scared when he met Pats.

    #247817

    u better believe it!!!!!! :wink:

    #247818

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @hermangrrrman! wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    Adrian Ringland, 36, of Lord Haddon Road, Ilkeston, Derbyshire.

    Hmmmm I wonder what his user name was???

    Anybody got any ideas???

    Dagger??? By any chance?

    Not possible – I know Dagger’s real name and it is NOT Adrian Ringland. That aside, he absolutely isn’t a paedophile etc.

    Try another?

    out of order makin fun on this thread!!! [-X [-X [-X

    #247819

    Bat

    @cath 55 wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @hermangrrrman! wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    Adrian Ringland, 36, of Lord Haddon Road, Ilkeston, Derbyshire.

    Hmmmm I wonder what his user name was???

    Anybody got any ideas???

    Dagger??? By any chance?

    Not possible – I know Dagger’s real name and it is NOT Adrian Ringland. That aside, he absolutely isn’t a paedophile etc.

    Try another?

    out of order makin fun on this thread!!! [-X [-X [-X

    Here here Cath..and Max? If you could just learn to use the ignore button all chatters are provided with then maybe you wouldnt get so wound up by Dagger eh? :wink: :wink:

    #247820

    In defence!

    PB asked people to guess the persons username on a chatsite someone suggested dager and PB said no as dagger isnt a paedophile, so all bases are covered stop bringing it up! you are worse than them! :D :D

    #247821

    Bat

    @token_male wrote:

    In defence!

    PB asked people to guess the persons username on a chatsite someone suggested dager and PB said no as dagger isnt a paedophile, so all bases are covered stop bringing it up! you are worse than them! :D :D

    Tm, Max picked on Dagger because he doesnt like him. You dont accuse someone of being something as horrific as a peadophile simply because you dislike them. That is why we defended him.

    #247822

    Well there you have it folks. But the serious underlying point here is that this unpleasant individual could be anyone on a chatsite – you simply don’t really know.

    This is why we at JustChat firstly do all we can to bar under 18’s and secondly always advise our users NEVER to disclose personal information.

Viewing 7 posts - 11 through 17 (of 17 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!