Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Shocking!!!
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 May, 2007 at 5:40 pm #269786
Ahh, you missed a distinct possibility tho pats (nice ass btw :wink: )
Were brainwashed in our society to pander to any whinging whiney sad case even when common sense suggests they actually deserve berating for their stupity or where they already knew better to begin with but chose quite blatantly the course of action that brought them to their whingey whining
But, that offsets a hell of a lot of objectivity in the baa baa sheepy majority
The possibility that every either seems to be missing or just doesnt want to be the first person to vocalise is the fact that its quite possible the parents are to blame or are involved, either to cover up something else or as a byproduct of something they have done, infact they could even have sold their daughter into the sex industry for all we know
We are too blinded by outdated and groundless stereotypes that no matter how many “rare anomalies” we see in the news still assert themselves as a primary perspective which then makes the rarer or harder to stomach possibilities the ones that are avoided which in itself helps them to occur more frequently by the very virtue of people working to avoid it being a forerunner in their thought processes and theories
Infact some of the other things people have commented on like the seemingly total lack of concern about leaving their kids, the less than expected levels of upset and even the uncle seeming to be quite smiley and upbeat when interviewed could be signs that theres a much darker truth here than being tossed around, and as its not uncommon for paedophillia to encompass entire families over several generations nothing can be ruled out at this point really
10 May, 2007 at 6:11 pm #269787So Uber, you think kids shouldn’t be allowed their lives? They shouldn’t be allowed to do this and that cos there’s dangers everywhere? So what should they do? Do you recommend that they should be prisoners in their own home? The point was that not every kid gets hurt, not every kid gets killed etc.
I don’t know how you read that and assumed it meant ‘It doesn’t happen – what are you all so worried about?’ But again, it’s just one of your assumptions. And yes, I did talk about responsibility. But I think you’ll also notice that I said that I acted mostly without their knowledge, when I was supposed to be somewhere else with someone else.
Regarding mentioning kids wandering the streets – no I wasn’t suggesting anything (but then, we know what you’re like with your ‘then surely you must mean this, that and the next thing’) I was merely stating that where I come from, people are defiant in the face of these things. That’s the mentality round here. And no – I did not say that it is the right thing to do.
10 May, 2007 at 6:27 pm #269788@johnboy25 wrote:
So Uber, you think kids shouldn’t be allowed their lives? They shouldn’t be allowed to do this and that cos there’s dangers everywhere? So what should they do? Do you recommend that they should be prisoners in their own home? The point was that not every kid gets hurt, not every kid gets killed etc.
I don’t know how you read that and assumed it meant ‘It doesn’t happen – what are you all so worried about?’ But again, it’s just one of your assumptions. And yes, I did talk about responsibility. But I think you’ll also notice that I said that I acted mostly without their knowledge, when I was supposed to be somewhere else with someone else.
Regarding mentioning kids wandering the streets – no I wasn’t suggesting anything (but then, we know what you’re like with your ‘then surely you must mean this, that and the next thing’) I was merely stating that where I come from, people are defiant in the face of these things. That’s the mentality round here. And no – I did not say that it is the right thing to do.
we are talking about a THREE YEAR OLD . she didnt choose to be left alone with her brother and sister. she is now ..god help her…..suffering the consequence of HER PARENTS actions! ok many a 12 yr old has said they are goin to their mates to watch a vid.and instead hung around the local shops. thats their decision. we are talking about the decision of 2 adults who decided it was safe enough to leave 3 toddlers under 4 alone in a room in a strange country.
10 May, 2007 at 6:33 pm #269789I doubt its defiance for the majority, just not being that bothered, stupidly assuming bad things happen to “other peoples kids” or just not knowing a better way to look after their kids because its how their parents did it and how everyone else around them seemingly does too
“defiance” with your own safety fairy snuff, be as reckless as you like. Being reckless with your kids safety when ever so coincidentally its ALSO the easiest and laziest way to be a parent (what a coincidence that is eh? lol) nah, its pathetic
I am sure that if the law said that whatever happened to your kids when not supervised was then done to the adults people would magically be far more careful with their kids safety, but when its only the kids who are going to suffer that seems to be fine lol, some standard of parenting THAT is haha
And yet again you sidestepped saying what mass of “life experience” 0-6 year olds are likely to accrue by hanging around and possibly dying on street corners unsupervised, or how kids too young to have any decent road sense being run over are gaining in their quality of life
Sorry and all that, but it still seems a very vaccuous arguement to defend indefensible lazy non consideration for a childs safety especially in light of how many kids of ages under 10 are attacked, killed, disfigured for life or are run over as well as how many of that age group are the ones doing those things (who coincidentally will also be part of the group allowed to wander)
As for stating an interpretation of what your words imply, I already pointed out its a discussion board just incase you hadnt noticed, you ARE actually allowed to comment and correct if an interpretation isnt acurate you know…….
Or you could even try saying what you actually mean instead
Either is fine
10 May, 2007 at 6:53 pm #269790Yes, I know we are talking about a three year old. But then it became almost like the rights and wrongs of parenting and how to look after a child of any age. I gave my opinion based on my experience as a child as some of the things being said were very different to the way things happen round here and I merely stated that fact (which Uber threw a wobbly over cos I wasn’t giving a valid opinion of every individual child the world over. Dunno why I didn’t, you’d think I’d know facts like that) I don’t know anyone who doesn’t allow their child freedom (depending on age obviously) Fact. You and others do. Fact. And I’m not talking about 12 or 13 year olds here. Most kids that age are already getting ready to leave home anyway!
We seem to have drifted way off topic and I’ll admit my part in that, I got too carried away with fighting my corner and waging war on those who try to tell me that I’m wrong. Incidentally – you can blame my mum for that! I don’t know anyone who would leave kids of that age alone and we were never left alone. Even if mum had to go out, our neighbours were also our friends. Another sign of the times – I hardly know any of my neighbours now.
Truce :?: And don’t tell anybody I backed down first!
10 May, 2007 at 7:07 pm #269791pats and bat cudos to you both. ive not been a perfect mum just normal i supose but my babies were never left alone they are 18 and 22 now and i still cant sleep till i know theyre home safe even if they are rotten drunk and with a couple of mates in tow at 3 in the morning [eldest that is] i always had a house full o mates and i love em all.
i even have nights out with their mates now super super super ole fart out wi the kids ha ha ha… :lol: :lol: :lol:
i see there is new leads to the lill girl but i fear its too late now to save her. i hope im wrong though..10 May, 2007 at 8:40 pm #269792@johnboy25 wrote:
Yes, I know we are talking about a three year old. But then it became almost like the rights and wrongs of parenting and how to look after a child of any age. I gave my opinion based on my experience as a child as some of the things being said were very different to the way things happen round here and I merely stated that fact (which Uber threw a wobbly over cos I wasn’t giving a valid opinion of every individual child the world over. Dunno why I didn’t, you’d think I’d know facts like that) I don’t know anyone who doesn’t allow their child freedom (depending on age obviously) Fact. You and others do. Fact. And I’m not talking about 12 or 13 year olds here. Most kids that age are already getting ready to leave home anyway!
We seem to have drifted way off topic and I’ll admit my part in that, I got too carried away with fighting my corner and waging war on those who try to tell me that I’m wrong. Incidentally – you can blame my mum for that! I don’t know anyone who would leave kids of that age alone and we were never left alone. Even if mum had to go out, our neighbours were also our friends. Another sign of the times – I hardly know any of my neighbours now.
Truce :?: And don’t tell anybody I backed down first!
no need fa a truce. its a message board. everyone has their own opinions.
10 May, 2007 at 10:00 pm #269793Believe me PATS, if I didn’t try to put a lid on it I’d still be fighting my corner into the next decade!! It’s best if we agree to disagree cos it’s two very different opinions – I’m looking at it from the point of my childhood while others have the views of concerned parents who will have a better understanding of emotions that I can’t fully comprehend.
10 May, 2007 at 11:27 pm #269794@johnboy25 wrote:
Believe me PATS, if I didn’t try to put a lid on it I’d still be fighting my corner into the next decade!! It’s best if we agree to disagree cos it’s two very different opinions – I’m looking at it from the point of my childhood while others have the views of concerned parents who will have a better understanding of emotions that I can’t fully comprehend.
I think that you’ve hit the nail on the head there John boy. Parents will usually have an opinion as to the safety of their children that non-parents find difficult to appreciate.
It’s not that we want to stifle their freedom or to in some way limit their opportunity to experience life …. but it is all about wanting to protect them and shield them from all the very real horrors that are out there.
11 May, 2007 at 9:36 am #269795I suppose uber was right in a way PB – I was kinda thinking ‘It never did me any harm’ but I WASN’T thinking ‘Where’s the harm? You should relax a bit’ which from the point of view of me and my friends at the time may be true enough to say but then others weren’t and still aren’t so fortunate. It was a bit naive to suggest and I can see that now. At the time though I was in full ‘defense’ mode!
Incidentally, anyone else hear about this £1m reward? Again I don’t understand things like that. As with celeb appeals, if someone can’t just do something out of the goodness of their own heart without some sort of motivation or incentive then there’s something badly wrong.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!