Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Shocking!!!
-
AuthorPosts
-
6 June, 2007 at 6:05 pm #270126
@Bad Manners wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
I wonder when the McCanns returned from the planet Zanussi?
Whilst the tone on this post was initially ”how awful” etc it rapidly changed to outright condemnation of this dysfunctional pair.
I suspect that this change in tone is reflected across the country (if not the whole of Europe) in pubs, clubs, homes, workplaces … and yes even on message boards.
Quite exactly how the Holy McCanns haven’t caught on to the fact that not only do we all think they were both grossly negligent, but also may have had some part to play in their daughter’s mysterious dissapearance, is beyond me.
It’s Witchhunters mentality thinking they had some part in it.
As ROTT has rightly pointed the people on this thread are scum for laughing at these people.
Im a bit surprised at you for jumping in with this crowd PB.BM no one is “laughing” at them. We are merely critisising their “parenting” skills. This whole bloody fiasco is entirely their fault. That innocent child has gone missing because of their negligence and stupidity.
Maddie was apparantly concieved through IVF. That costs a lot of money and we dont know how many attempts they had. Maybe they got into debt and arranged the “abduction”. Who knows, but they really shouldn,t be surprised that people think they may have had something to do with it. It would help if they at least tried to look upset and maybe shed a tear on occasion.6 June, 2007 at 6:17 pm #270127I saw her the other day in tears. Is that good enough for you lot?
They’ve gotta appear tearful or emotional every time they step in front of a Camera? Is that what you’re saying? Or everyone will wade in with their comments about how their lack of emotion could mean they had someone to do with it.
Their both trained Proffesionals trained to keep calm under pressure. Anyway what’s it gotta do with you or anyone else whether they want to keep their emotions in check in front of the Cameras.Yeah, you have all been laughing at them or mocking them with your jokes. Very smart.
6 June, 2007 at 6:35 pm #270128BM how the hell can any one leave a child of her age ALONE
Jamie bulgier was with his mother just wondered off a bit and look what happened
Ok i may be a over the top mother who dont let her kids out her sight But f00k me she was a nipper
Alone in a foreign country on a FAMIELY holiday
I will never be able to have sympathy for the mother and father only the poor INACENT child
6 June, 2007 at 6:38 pm #270129“I saw her the other day in tears. Is that good enough for you lot?”
You did? What happened? Did they get told they might have to end their holiday and go home?
6 June, 2007 at 6:38 pm #270130@Bad Manners wrote:
I saw her the other day in tears. Is that good enough for you lot?
They’ve gotta appear tearful or emotional every time they step in front of a Camera? Is that what you’re saying? Or everyone will wade in with their comments about how their lack of emotion could mean they had someone to do with it.
Their both trained Proffesionals trained to keep calm under pressure. Anyway what’s it gotta do with you or anyone else whether they want to keep their emotions in check in front of the Cameras.Yeah, you have all been laughing at them or mocking them with your jokes. Very smart.
BM the whole point we are trying to make here, is that none of us would be in any fit state to step in front of a camera, walk around shaking hands with people, getting blessed at the local church, going for walks for “our” time on the beach or meeting the soddin pope. And as for flying around the world and leaving the 2 remaing kids with relatives?? ffs. Dont, you think those two kids need their parents with them more than ever now? Yet again, the McCanns are thinking only of themselves.
Maddies disapearance is being well publicised enough as it is. There really isn,t any need for them to go flying off anywhere. They should be with their two kids, and trying to be responsible parents for once. Havn,t seen much evidence of that so far, have you?6 June, 2007 at 6:43 pm #270131They’re trying to keep it in the Public Eye, and make sure as many people as possible are farmiliar with the little girl.
Getting blessed by the Pope means maximum exposure for the case, in as many countries as possible. Do you think it would have been wise of them to take their remaining kids on this long journey?
The Dissaperance might be well publicised in this countries, but it wasnt in other countries. The whole aim of it was making as many people farmiliar with it as they possibly could.6 June, 2007 at 6:44 pm #270132@sunny wrote:
BM how the hell can any one leave a child of her age ALONE
Jamie bulgier was with his mother just wondered off a bit and look what happened
Ok i may be a over the top mother who dont let her kids out her sight But f00k me she was a nipper
Alone in a foreign country on a FAMIELY holiday
I will never be able to have sympathy for the mother and father only the poor INACENT child
Whatver the mistakes were it dosent excuse the mocking and joking of these people that’s went on in this thread.
6 June, 2007 at 6:48 pm #270133“Do you think it would have been wise of them to take their remaining kids on this long journey?”
LOL
Youre kidding right? That was meant to be a joke?
We’re talking about the people who have already taken their kids from the UK to portugal here, and youre saying that going to with them Italy is in some way detrimental to their kids lol
Suppose they had flown to itally to begin with and THEN maddy had been snatched, would you be criticising them for taking the kids there to begin with then? if not then them taking the kids ISNT a bad thing
Infact the remaining kids being with their galivanting parents wherever they go is I reckon a good thing seeing as they have lost a sibling FFS
Dont you think they NEED their parents right about now to actually be acting like parents rather than abandoning them at the merest whiff of a photo opportunity?
I have lost any thought that their craving for media exposure is really about Maddy anymore, personally I think its their own intoxication with the fame and exposure
6 June, 2007 at 6:54 pm #270134I aint replying on this thread anymore. I’ll leave you to make your witty little jokes with your Clique.
6 June, 2007 at 6:55 pm #270135“It’s Witchhunters mentality thinking they had some part in it”
BM, no its not actually, “witch hunters mentality” would be ONLY thinking they had something to do with it at the complete exclusion of any other possibility which is as close minded an outlook as being incapable of accepting its “possible”
Not ruling it out isnt close minded, its the opposite actually when it sits alongside many other equal possibilities
Infact a witch hunters mentality is closer shown by people who would ONLY think its someone else and CANT be the parents at all even tho there is nothing at all that can rule them out of being a possible accomplice or even the perpetrators
Thinking it COULD be them OR it could be someone else is actually pretty much the total opposite of a witch hunters mentality really, unless youre talking about witch hunts where witches were given a fair trial and guilt or innocence wasnt decided before the trial of course, but they werent called witch hunts anyway
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!