Shocking!!!

@ubermik wrote:

@fastcars wrote:

So do we call you MIKE the pompous cross dresser… :?:

or Michaela the raving lesbian who has a penchant for other womens arses… :?:

I prefer the more obvious choice but then my IQ is only very low eh… :wink:

Why are you asking me? Cant you make an unnaided decision?

And why do you think I care eitherway what you think or call me? Do you think you, your views or writings have any relevance to me whatsoever?

Its words on a website written by a complete stranger, some perspective eh?

And youre still not quite grasping the point at all are ya? Its “ONLINE”, what makes you think that even mike isnt part of the fabrication?

But just to dumb it down so you will understand it

If you check back I havent said anything whatsoever is false or true either way (check if you dont believe me lol), what I have said is you dont “know” whether it is or not, you dont know my gender, sexual orientation or whether I like marmite or not

What you THINK you know is via what I choose quite deliberately to write in a style of writing that equally deliberate for a specific reason. Some is acurate, some is false and some is omitted consistently across the board (excuse the pun)

So the point is you dont “know” anything, you summise, extrapolate and theorise based on what I choose to show and not on anything I dont, so as I said to begin with which you also seemed to go off on a tangent with, you dont “KNOW” anything, your own arrogance just makes you think you do

Which is shown pretty clearly by thinking you’ll get a reaction by questioning my sexual orientation for one lol, I’m just not that insecure soz lol

Which isnt the same

:lol:

So the parents don’t seem to give a sh it, yet are loving the media coverage. Social services STILL aren’t involved to consider the care of the other children, and Uber likes long words ……. :roll: :wink: :lol:

@ubermik wrote:

I like short ones too, even some four letter ones

I’ve an equal opportunity typer :D :wink:

Anyway, our touchy feely victim pandering society will most probably mean that even if social services wanted to intervene when they return to the UK, even if they think they OUGHT to intervene when they return to the UK for the safety of the other kids they most probably wont do because of the media circus THAT would then create criticising the fact they did intervene when the poor distraught parents have just been through so much yada yada blah blah

More than likely :roll: :roll: :twisted: :twisted:

One of the ironic whimsies of a psuedo wanna be socialist society tho is that they scream about peoples individual rights at the expense of the rights of the people that persons rights affect as well as not also making sure they take the responsibilities both personal and social that go with those rights

We have to jump through many hoops on a daily basis merely to drive a car, yet anyone however ill suited or qualified can breed even tho that act of breeding and procreating can have the most pervasive effect possible on their offsprings life, where are the yet to be born childrens “rights” being considered?

i’m just waiting for the book. *maddie*,,,,,,,,,our grief…….a true story compellingly written by kate n gerry mcann about the loss of their 4 yr old daughter and how the church and the media helped them get over their terrible loss. :evil: :roll:

@sunny wrote:

F00k i dread you replying after me i never no what the f00k you mean lol

But i think you agree with me ????

In a round about way sort of maybe

How about a simple no ya wrong sunny or yeah sunny i agree would be soooooooo much easier for me to understand

Thank you very muchly

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :P