-
Posts
-
@sunny wrote:
Watching the news My oldest who is 16 said to me mom how can she always have time to look so nice
Hair always curly or straight make up perfect she is 16 and still sees something is not right
She said mom i would be so upset i wouldn’t want to even talk to any one
Can any one remember the Jamie bulgier god i still cringe at that story
His mother was suicidal for weeks months years and still is
I’m sorry i feel for them for loosing their child but they was irrisponsable to say the least
And they seem to be loving the lime light …………………Its the lil girls Birthdays today
I’m sorry but i wouldn’t be on sky news saying the sh ite they are i would be thinking of my daughter ……………….Where the f00k she is who the f00k as her
An if i will ever see her again safe and well
They ain’t helping their selves at all in my opinion with what the public think of them
In respect to weather they are right or wrong
Again Sunny your right. I wouldn,t be in any fit state to talk to the media.
I wonder how long the parents are staying out there…until she is found I should imagine. I can,t imagine they,ll leave Portugal until she is found..that,s IF she,s ever found.
I think you’ll find when any child goes missing in any circumstances you will find each have had to face the press… Isnt the Police whom say they should be making appeals etc to the Media….
and for those whom have taken my words wrongly I wasnt comparing leaving 3 under 4’s in their beds in an apartment in a forgien country… like nipping into a shop…
Mistake maybe the wrong word but I aint being litrate… or word perfect…
@abitofmary_j wrote:
I think you’ll find when any child goes missing in any circumstances you will find each have had to face the press… Isnt the Police whom say they should be making appeals etc to the Media…….
This is atually a most interesting point Mary … and one that hasn’t been picked up on previously.
Generally (NOT always) Police persuade the ‘innocent’ parent / relative / friend / neighbour whoever, to appear in front of the Media to make a sobbing tear stained public statement for one very good reason. That person is their prime suspect in the murder / kidnapping / missing child enquiry.
By getting the person to do this, it totally undermines any possible defence they may have downstream when they are charged with the offence. They show themselves up as a totally callous individual who would do and say anything to cover up the enormity of their crime.
Think back to numerous cases where a ‘grieving’ person has made a tear-stained public appeal etc and then remember later on how they were often charged and convicted of the offence.
Do NOT misunderstand me on this. I am not specifically accusing the mother or father of the little girl of complicity in her disappearance. But when the solution to this matter is discovered, as eventually in time it will be, …. remember my words!!!
i’d never leave my little one ever just to nip in out or on anything……maybe you can call it being over protective, but I’d rather be like this then have say im a statistic i had a child but because i chose to leave them alone i dont have one anymore….. yeah we all do things and is classed as a mistake but dont we learn from lessons and expierences… I got asked when my likkle one was a few weeks old what fears have i got and as a new mum you have many but the only fear i have is some one taking him….. The lady who asked me at the time said god that a weird fear to have…. But in this day and age is it…..Anything can happen anywhere anytime as it shows with this little girl…..I do hope from my heart she is ok…..
@sunny wrote:
Watching the news My oldest who is 16 said to me mom how can she always have time to look so nice
Hair always curly or straight make up perfect she is 16 and still sees something is not right
She said mom i would be so upset i wouldn’t want to even talk to any one
Can any one remember the Jamie bulgier god i still cringe at that story
His mother was suicidal for weeks months years and still is
I’m sorry i feel for them for loosing their child but they was irrisponsable to say the least
And they seem to be loving the lime light …………………Its the lil girls Birthdays today
I’m sorry but i wouldn’t be on sky news saying the sh ite they are i would be thinking of my daughter ……………….Where the f00k she is who the f00k as her
An if i will ever see her again safe and well
They ain’t helping their selves at all in my opinion with what the public think of them
In respect to weather they are right or wrong
I’ve seen a Photo of this Woman today, and she sure dosent look perfect. She looks pale, unkempt, and tired.
People react in differrent ways. It sometimes takes a while for the enormity and shock to sink in.
Ya’ll have no idea what these people will be going through. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.@forumhostpb wrote:
@abitofmary_j wrote:
I think you’ll find when any child goes missing in any circumstances you will find each have had to face the press… Isnt the Police whom say they should be making appeals etc to the Media…….
This is atually a most interesting point Mary … and one that hasn’t been picked up on previously.
Generally (NOT always) Police persuade the ‘innocent’ parent / relative / friend / neighbour whoever, to appear in front of the Media to make a sobbing tear stained public statement for one very good reason. That person is their prime suspect in the murder / kidnapping / missing child enquiry.
By getting the person to do this, it totally undermines any possible defence they may have downstream when they are charged with the offence. They show themselves up as a totally callous individual who would do and say anything to cover up the enormity of their crime.
Think back to numerous cases where a ‘grieving’ person has made a tear-stained public appeal etc and then remember later on how they were often charged and convicted of the offence.
Do NOT misunderstand me on this. I am not specifically accusing the mother or father of the little girl of complicity in her disappearance. But when the solution to this matter is discovered, as eventually in time it will be, …. remember my words!!!
Glad ive said something that hasn’t been picnic’d on by the wolves lol
@pats wrote:
@ubermik wrote:
I would have thought the actor who played Len Fairclough in corrie, Garry Glitter or Michael Jackson making an appeal might have carried more weight lol, infact, all they would have probably needed to have done is consulted their phone book and made a few calls to close friends to have sorted it out lol :lol:
:shock: :lol:
people that treat paedophillia as a laughing matter are an accessory to the act
both of you are truly disgusting@r.O.T.T wrote:
@pats wrote:
@ubermik wrote:
I would have thought the actor who played Len Fairclough in corrie, Garry Glitter or Michael Jackson making an appeal might have carried more weight lol, infact, all they would have probably needed to have done is consulted their phone book and made a few calls to close friends to have sorted it out lol :lol:
:shock: :lol:
people that treat paedophillia as a laughing matter are an accessory to the act
both of you are truly disgustingFunny to think that uber took the moral highground with me for daring to suggest that perhaps kids should be allowed to be kids while they have the chance.
And then that same person goes on to joke about paedophillia?
Oh yeah, and the days where it was never mentioned and nobody even bought it up in conversation were better then eh? lol
As for being an “accessory” haha, if you say so.
Humour is humour, and in no ways aids people being killed, molested, having cancer, being run over by a bus or being fat
Those things just happen all by themselves, you can either find the irony and humour in them or be a miserable git, its a choice
Infact try talking to people who work in professions where the worst excesses of human nature are commonplace and you will find that joking about “it” whatever it is will be pretty commonplace and is the only way many people in those jobs can cope with the abhorrent barbarity they see daily
And anyway, it was pretty much observational humour anyway, IE its pretty close to the truth so how you manage to make the massive leap in being judgemental from stating something thats pretty self evident to that statement being an active facilitator of an activity (which IS what youre snide comment was implying btw) is one that could surely only be made with the help of prozac or similar as it defies any sane logic
If you dont find it funny dont say it, dont laugh at it and dont join in, thats a freedom of choice and I am sure that things you DO find funny would be equally as unpallateable to me
But when you cross from simply not liking a particular type of humour into the realms of subtly implying that finding a type of humour funny equates to a support of or trivialisation of the actual act itself you are stepping outside the bounds of your own personal freedoms and are trying to impose your own personal preference onto others
“Funny to think that uber took the moral highground “
See, even johhny thought it was funny lol :lol:
Actually its not funny at all, theres a big difference between laughing AT paedophillia, IE watching it on a video and tittering all the way through it and making fun OF paedophiles
But thats a moot point anyway as I would be interested to see how what was said was making light OF the act of paedophillia, what it was actually doing was pointing out a pretty factual point about paedos having networks rather than being solitary operators like rapists
Hardly the same thing, same topic, but not anything at all like making jokes about the act
However, I do know some quite hysterical thigh slappers about it if you are interested, let me know and I can mail em to ya if you want lol
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!