Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Shanons "mother" guilty
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 December, 2008 at 1:42 pm #12356
How long do you reckon she,ll get then? 5 years, 10 years? I bet she gets time off of her “sentence” because of time spent on remand. That is all wrong. I don,t care how much time she has spent on remand. She should get a sentence and serve the FULL sentence.
Shanon Mathews4 December, 2008 at 2:13 pm #387661I doubt very much she could write a full sentence
6 December, 2008 at 12:23 am #387662this mother should be shot!!! having druged her daghter on temazepam for 3 years just makes my blood boil. as for the kidnapping , feck who would do such a thing to there own daughter, makes my blood run cold,just thinking about it
6 December, 2008 at 11:04 pm #387663Another contender for the sterilisation clinic !!!!!!
Jeepers the RSPCA take more care & do more checks before they place animals.
Perhaps Social services should borrow their manual !!!!!I will never ever understand how these people’s minds work – yet they go on to have loads of kids usually by many different partners & it’s always the poor kids that suffer. :(
7 December, 2008 at 2:44 am #387664The only positive thing about this case is that Shannon is alive, away from her mother, and hopefully with time and guidance, will grow up learning more valuable morals about life than she ever would have learned at home.
7 December, 2008 at 10:16 am #387665@cherrybomb wrote:
The only positive thing about this case is that Shannon is alive, away from her mother, and hopefully with time and guidance, will grow up learning more valuable morals about life than she ever would have learned at home.
Good job she doesn’t live in Haringey then as the Social Services would have returned her to the mother and her sub-normal paedophile boyfriend ….. after doing a full report of course.
7 December, 2008 at 11:58 am #387666Perish the thought.
10 December, 2008 at 8:19 pm #387667Isn’t it strange that in this case noone is blaming the police that failed to notice something was seriously wrong with her mother or boyfriend – aren’t they trained to know when someone is lying ?? Isn’t the police liaison officer that was with them all day every day to blame and that noone realised that she had kidnapped her own child ?? Didn’t the teachers notice before that there was something wrong ?? Why isn’t there a witchhunt on these people as in the Baby P case ??? People have such double standards ……. :( :(
( That was all said tongue in cheek as there is such a difference in the two threads on these two awful cases )
One thread blames the mother – one blames the social workers, their boss and their boss and everyone in the council that had a passing look at the files…strange that…..!!!
:roll: :roll: :roll:
11 December, 2008 at 10:58 am #387668@lovely Lady wrote:
Isn’t it strange that in this case noone is blaming the police that failed to notice something was seriously wrong with her mother or boyfriend – aren’t they trained to know when someone is lying ??
LL the very sad fact is that in most cases of this sort, the victim and the offender are known to each other. Sometimes it is “family” and sometimes it is a “close friend” or neighbour.
Police are very much aware of this and as they develop their list of suspects, they invariably include those that are or were known to the victim.
I’ve posted this comment before (on threads about the infamous Maggie McCann so-called kidnapping) but I have a theory that has so far stood the test of time.
In practically every case where Police suspect (but cannot at that stage prove) the involvement of a family member etc, they always get the person to make a well publicised Media appearance pleading for the safe return of ……. or begging for the murderer to hand themselves in etc etc.
My theory is that by doing this, Police very successfully publicly demonstrate the utter lies and callous deceit of the accused, so that when all is revealed (in Court) the person is denied any chance of defending themselves with further lies to the effect that they “didn’t mean it” or whatever.
If you think back over many many cases of murder or kidnapping etc, in almost every case that a tearstained public Media statement is made, that person is subsequently arrested and charged with the crime.
The Police almost certainly “knew” that Sharon’s mother was involved – along with members of her extended family – but lacked the evidence needed to arrest and charge her.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!