Sad,,,,,,,,,,,but yet another warning.

@forumhostpb wrote:

Actually minim, i don’t totally agree with you here. I’m a governor of a primary school and i can tell you that absolutely EVERYONE in anyway connected with doing anything at all at the school HAS to be CRB checked before they are allowed to do it. This includes governors (who generally don’t come into contact directly with the children) through to mothers who might give a talk at a lunchtime to a small group of children.

Nobody is prepared to take the risk of any incident arising from a non CRB checked person doing anything to or with a child – and quite rightly too in my opinion.

We also tightly restrict access, by both parents and others, to the school grounds during school hours. In the past (thank God not with the school I’m involved with) people have accessed nearby school premises during school hours and been seen trying to ‘talk’ to children in the playground.

We had a case last summer of a single mum who took up with a ‘boyfriend’ who, by his behaviour near the school, caused other parents to report him both to the headteacher and to the Police. (He was seen trying to put his arm round and cuddle Year 4 girls as they left the school).

It turned out that he was a registered sex offender and had established a relationship with this woman so as to gain access both to her child and to other children through her.

So yes ‘parents’ can be dangerour to children as can their (sometimes casual or short term) ‘boyfriends / girlfriends. Allowing people onto school premises contravenes every safeguarding rule in the book.

All i meant was that CRB checks don’t prove someone is innocent, or “safe” to be around children. And if a local council is preventing parents looking after their own children and putting in CRB checked individuals because they are “safe” then they are wrong.

As others have said.. CRB checks only flag up people with previous convictions or history.

I think everyone dealing with vulnerable adults and children should be CRB checked, but there will always be people who abuse their positions, and CRB checking will not prevent that.

Vigilence is important, children and the vulnerable have a right to be protected, but generallyas people grow up they need to learn how to protect themselves.

Look when they’re caught shoot the fuckers how hard can it be

Personally behead and crucify them like they going to do in Saudi!!

I think it should be crucify and then behead!

death is too kind for them

@cas wrote:

@susieq wrote:

death is too kind for them

I agree Susie. That way, death would no doubt come to them, but it’d be slow and painful :evil:

they deserve to die a slow and painful death . . it should be as toturous to them as they have been