Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Riddle Me This, Richard Dawkins
-
AuthorPosts
-
27 March, 2017 at 2:13 am #1028319
Ask any woman who is involved with a male in some way…think work, relationship, etc
I asked one called Draculina, she says she has no idea what you are talking about.
Perhaps she’s not very perceptive.
Try asking another.
27 March, 2017 at 2:15 am #1028322Perhaps she’s not very perceptive. Try asking another.
Error 404 : Woman not found.
27 March, 2017 at 2:20 am #1028326Try considering one away from JC.
27 March, 2017 at 11:42 am #1028364I realise you’re male and sometimes can’t help yourself, but please, please make an effort with the selective reading when interacting with me.
Sexism, great.
Not sexism at all. It’s a well known fact that the male gender is very good at selective reading
It’s not a “well known fact ” at all, but what is patently obvious to anyone reading the posts of written diarrhea left like a trail on every thread is that you have a very limited intelligence and contribute nothing to the forum with your meaningless sound bites of gibberish. Go back to your flower/weed arranging
27 March, 2017 at 12:07 pm #1028368Yes, you’ve proven us plenty of your watery bowel movements
27 March, 2017 at 12:15 pm #1028370Yes, you’ve proven us plenty of your watery bowel movements
I’m in my 30s, you’re self projecting again as you carry around bags of your own faeces Blossom/ Tokyo Rose whatever you call yourself these days . I suspect you are a bitter old woman due to being beaten black and blue by your ex husband so have now formed your view of men till the grave subsequently now stroking numerous cats to keep you company like a modern day version of Dr Claw from Inspector Gadget reiterating your hatred of men whenever possible but whatever floats your boat old girl… what I don’t understand is if you hate the threads so much why do you keep commenting on them?
27 March, 2017 at 12:17 pm #1028372The posts of written diarrhea are from you old girl BTW, perhaps you should improve your selective reading or has dementia set in?
27 March, 2017 at 12:46 pm #1028378Hello again big boy, oops… rude boy.. why are you hiding?
Coward springs to mind
Thanks for the lovely description.
Sadly (for you) I am neither inclined, nor have time for joining in with your watery bowel movements
27 March, 2017 at 4:21 pm #1028445yep definitely dementia
27 March, 2017 at 9:27 pm #1028753None of you posting on this thread (me included) will ever know the answer to what you’re discussing …. so my question is, is there any point in discussing something to which there is no ‘proven’ answer to and never will be in any of our lifetimes and long beyond ? If so, mind telling me what said point is, besides each of you giving their own point of view on the subject and what influence does it actually have on your lives, considering you even have one?
I’ll call you Blossom or I get confused.
You should read the title of the thread. Dawkins claims that ‘science’ has disproved the existence of God, and he uses evolution theory to demonstrate that Christianity is an incoherent and contradictory account of how man (and woman) was created.
I’m trying to call that into question by using modern scientific arguments about the origin of the cosmos.
Of course, nobody can prove or disprove the existence of God, but that doesn’t end the discussion.
To me, it’s a question of trying to move beyond Sunday School Christianity and the sort of atheism which is on the primary school level of ‘there is no Father Christmas’.
There is a more adult form of Christianity – more discerning, more hesitant – just as there is a more adult form of atheism.
I find this topic to be fascinating. I’m ready to listen to anyone with a serious point to make.
I’ll answer any serious point you make. If you don’t make one, then I’ll ignore it.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!