Boards Index General discussion Getting serious Riddle Me This, Richard Dawkins

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 66 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1028319

    Ask any woman who is involved with a male in some way…think work, relationship, etc

    I asked one called Draculina, she says she has no idea what you are talking about.

    Perhaps  she’s not very perceptive.

    Try asking another.

    #1028322

    Perhaps she’s not very perceptive. Try asking another.

    Error 404 : Woman not found.

    #1028326

    Try considering one away from JC.

    #1028364

    I realise you’re male and sometimes can’t help yourself, but please, please make an effort with the selective reading when interacting with me.

    Sexism, great.

    Not sexism at all. It’s a well known fact that the male gender is very good at selective reading :yes:

    It’s not a “well known fact ” at all, but what is patently obvious to anyone reading the posts of written diarrhea left like a trail on every thread is that you have a very limited intelligence and contribute nothing to the forum with your meaningless sound bites of gibberish. Go back to your flower/weed arranging  :yes:

    #1028368

    Yes, you’ve proven us plenty of your watery bowel movements :yes:

    #1028370

    Yes, you’ve proven us plenty of your watery bowel movements :yes:

    I’m in my 30s, you’re self projecting again as you carry around bags of your own faeces  Blossom/ Tokyo Rose whatever you call yourself these days . I suspect you are a bitter old woman  due to being beaten black and blue by your ex husband so have now formed your view of men till the grave subsequently now stroking numerous cats to keep you company like a modern day version of Dr Claw from Inspector Gadget reiterating your hatred of men whenever possible but whatever floats your boat old girl… what I don’t understand is if you hate the threads so much why do you keep commenting on them?

    #1028372

    The posts of written diarrhea are from you old girl BTW, perhaps you should improve your selective reading or has dementia set in?  :yes:

    #1028378

    Hello again big boy, oops… rude boy.. why are you hiding?

    Coward springs to mind :yes:

    Thanks for the lovely description.

    Sadly (for you) I am neither inclined, nor have time for joining  in with your watery bowel movements   :-)   :bye:

     

    #1028445

    yep definitely dementia  :wacko:   :yes:

    #1028753

    None of you posting on this thread (me included) will ever know the answer to what you’re discussing …. so my question is, is there any point in discussing something to which there is no ‘proven’ answer to and never will be in any of our lifetimes and long beyond ? If so, mind telling me what said point is, besides each of you giving their own point of view on the subject and what influence does it actually have on your lives, considering you even have one?

    I’ll call you Blossom or I get confused.

    You should read the title of the thread. Dawkins claims that ‘science’ has  disproved the existence of God, and he uses evolution theory to demonstrate that Christianity is an incoherent and contradictory account of how man (and woman) was created.

    I’m trying to call that into question by using modern scientific arguments about the origin of the cosmos.

    Of course, nobody can prove or disprove the existence of God, but that doesn’t end the discussion.

    To me, it’s a question of trying to move beyond Sunday School Christianity and the sort of atheism which is on the primary school level of ‘there is no Father Christmas’.

    There is a more adult form of Christianity – more discerning, more hesitant – just as there is a more adult form of atheism.

    I find this topic to be fascinating. I’m ready to listen to anyone with a serious point to make.

    I’ll answer any serious point you make. If you don’t make one, then I’ll ignore it.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 66 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!