-
Posts
-
No Rubes, but it might get you a spot on ‘Talented Grannies’ next year – BBC Digital Channel 537b. :wink:
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
Well there you have it folks. Proof if proof was ever needed that I take things too seriously and that I have no sense of humour. I personally find this thread highly distasteful, manipulative and more worthy of a schoolyard than of a supposedly adult message board. I am perfectly aware that nobody has been named, or is even remotely likely to actually exist. But that was never the point was it PB? The MSN tumtums will have done the dirty job for you, and I have no doubt that 3/4 of the female users of F3 will by now have had their names mentioned and speculated upon.
Why didn’t you make a poll out of this PB and suggest names yourself? Is it because it is a lot more fun (not to mention a heck of a lot safer) to sit back and watch others doing YOUR slandering?
You may now reply to this using your pet name for me …. Although I usually only permit it during our more personal …erm …. chats shall we say, I will make an exception for you …. just this once. :wink:
Agree, its not nice is it?
Does it matter who he/she is?
@james Belfast wrote:
Hmmm it’s north of the watford gap, he says, so that rules out Chastity and Mikie Female and maybe Fay – anyone else live down south? Is it Catmanblue, PB?
Actually, the more I think about this, the more I believe it is a matter for the police. Is he saying that a F3 reg, known to him, advertises children’s entertainment on posters in private schools and then when they phone her up she instead gets porny with them?
Try phoning this number PB : 999. That should work.On a point of accuracy, I specifically didn’t say that she got ”porny” with them – simply that they got a lot more than they bargained for. I am most reliably informed that the various conversations may have included sex and travel though.
@forumhostpb wrote:
@james Belfast wrote:
Hmmm it’s north of the watford gap, he says, so that rules out Chastity and Mikie Female and maybe Fay – anyone else live down south? Is it Catmanblue, PB?
Actually, the more I think about this, the more I believe it is a matter for the police. Is he saying that a F3 reg, known to him, advertises children’s entertainment on posters in private schools and then when they phone her up she instead gets porny with them?
Try phoning this number PB : 999. That should work.On a point of accuracy, I specifically didn’t say that she got ”porny” with them – simply that they got a lot more than they bargained for. I am most reliably informed that the various conversations may have included sex and travel though.
she tells em to fook off??? :shock:
@pete wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
@pete wrote:
ah rumour eh… well rumour usually turns out to be complete b*llocks
I am assured that this one has a strong foundation in fact.
Any more ideas anybody???
like the definitely a female poster rumour ???
who should be named???… theres no one to name what ya think the idea of the thread is .. its to stir it up and half of you are gossiping away about who it is and in no time fiction becomes fact …shame on you
Indeed. Why do we need this essential piece of information regarding users. Can we find out something about you instead PB? :D
Or how about a JC Pow Wow and we all reveal something about ourselves nobody has heard or indeed, wants to know.
For example… Tommy might want to reveal he is a cross dresser, in particular high heels…
Or Pete likes to knit scarves for baby elephants. :D
@pete wrote:
reliably informed by a male who mistakenly thought it was an actual clown.. pull the other one.. and even if he didnt thats ok cause he’s male eh.. and reliably formed its a female.. weve been reliably informed of that before eh (anther ref for you to ignore) :wink: :lol:
Give it a rest Pete, eh?- You’ve been banging on about this for ages. It’s lost its point by now.
@forumhostpb wrote:
@pete wrote:
reliably informed by a male who mistakenly thought it was an actual clown.. pull the other one.. and even if he didnt thats ok cause he’s male eh.. and reliably formed its a female.. weve been reliably informed of that before eh (anther ref for you to ignore) :wink: :lol:
Give it a rest Pete, eh?- You’ve been banging on about this for ages. It’s lost its point by now.
:lol: dont ye luv it wen the men biatchfight.
@pete wrote:
:wink: :wink: :lol:
teks pete to msn 4 a good spankin…………………………. :lol: 8) :wink: :wink: :wink:
@pete wrote:
not only me though eh.. and youve been ignoring it for ages fact is you lied and you were hoping everyone would forget tut tut
Yes Pete I told an outright lie. And yes Pete I was ignoring your repetitive posts on the subject (but more out of sheer boredom than an intention to make the subject of my outright lie go away).
So everybody, here’s the news. Gosh I told a lie some time ago!! ‘Magoo’ isn’t female after all – ‘Magoo’ is actually a male – Wow !!!
If some of you believed this outright lie – Oh dear…. sorry !!! (Pete didn’t believe it though because he is really clever and knew all the time that ‘Magoo’ was male not female).
There, I’ve admitted it now – and I feel soooooo much better.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!