-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
@genie_in_a_butthole wrote:
1/ Not relevent, you didn’t answer the question.
2/ So you would abolish religion out of hand
You still didn’t answer the question, WHERE would they go?
3/ So your not going to promote it, so you believe a man or woman wakes up one day and says “hmmm my wife/husband is annoying me, i think i’ll sleep with someone of the same sex as me”, promotion has nothing to do with homosexuality, acceptance is the message not “Go on, be gay…you know you want to”. Your non-promotion of it will change nothing so why cite it in your agenda…pointless.
1. You offer money to encourage people to leave.
2. I never said that. People who thought that their religion amongst others, is something that is workable would have to learn that it isnt the way forward. Weve tried it. If they wont listen, then they would be encouraged to leave the country, where they go is up to them. Its a very very complex situation, the majority belief may have to be implemented, pointless just aboloshing all political religion if theres uproar.
3. I believe that the best sexual framework for a successfull society is the promotion of hetrosexuality, the family whereby one of man and woman are the leaders equally bringing up children.
Im not saying you cant be gay, nor have a religious belief, im saying that there needs to be a core belief system, that is what we stand for, because multi-faith/culture/sexual longing doesn’t work.
This means that non hetrosexuals, atleast all but one faith, all those bar the English and white people, will feel left out. Seems harsh, but the point is, weve tried the opposite.An alternative is to segregate society, so that we have sexual, religious, nationality and colour cities. I dont mind that, atleast everyone can follow their belief system under a british government.
1/ Is Bribery an official policy of the BNP then?
Where would this money come from? My Taxes?2/ What is the difference between religion and political religion?
If England adopted a non-multicultural approach and foreign countries did the same, where would they physically go?3/ Are you saying you want a society of 1 race, 1 religious belief system, 1 sexual preference etc?
That has been tried before Emma, it was called Nazism. Then again, your system here is almost the definition of Facism…well done.1. Ive explained this.
2. Anywhere they can, or stay here.
3. I want a society thats as free from harm as we humans can get it, with it pleasurable. We havn’t tried nazism, and im not sure if any kind of nazism would work. What did work quite well was about the 1950’s without the multuculturalists taking a strong hold.
Now if we could have that, mixed with the modernised good we have today, we’d be better off.
I cannot understand why you want a mixture that doesn’t work, barmy.
@emmalush wrote:
1. Ive explained this.
2. Anywhere they can, or stay here.
3. I want a society thats as free from harm as we humans can get it, with it pleasurable. We havn’t tried nazism, and im not sure if any kind of nazism would work. What did work quite well was about the 1950’s without the multuculturalists taking a strong hold.
Now if we could have that, mixed with the modernised good we have today, we’d be better off.
I cannot understand why you want a mixture that doesn’t work, barmy.
But what about the 50’s is it that worked well? Why do you feel 50’s society was so much better than today’s? I don’t necessarily disagree that socially the 50’s were a more cohesive, settled, inclusive era BUT I do not accept that multi culturalism has been the cause of this country’s social breakdown
@slayer wrote:
But what about the 50’s is it that worked well? Why do you feel 50’s society was so much better than today’s? I don’t necessarily disagree that socially the 50’s were a more cohesive, settled, inclusive era BUT I do not accept that multi culturalism has been the cause of this country’s social breakdown
Social cohesion was better, as was the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Now we have atleast 3 asian only areas, white only areas and black only areas. There are faith schooling, more segregation. People dont wana mix, it is not a lovely dovey society thats portrayed. We are constantly lied to. Gun crime is enourmous, thats partly due to a mass of differing cultures, people feeling the need to defend themselves. Also because we have a namby pamby government.
Racial unrest has been big over recent years, weve had numerous murders, riots, hundreds of “discrimination” cases. Again, this causes a them versus us divide, all the governments fault for allowing a multicultural society.
We waste hundreds of thousands, millions maybe on racial organisations. We (the patriotic white community) dont need it. We’d be better off letting you guys fund that.
A successfull society needs a core base of political and social belief, that most people agree with.
At the moment, we dont collectively know what the belief is specifically, other than, we allow non white and non English/british people a fairer go than ourselves. Most people disagree that the multicultural experiment is working, but they dont vote against it yet, rather vote for the very basics, that they think the has been still know what their doing. Most voters are stupid, easily sold, a blaggers dream. The deal is to rally the millions who dont vote, their desperate for a way out of this nightmare.
We’ll never have community spirit whilst theres a mass multiple of differing cultures to feed.
The minority cultures will suffer slayer, when push becomes shove, when the decent people get enough crap thrown at them, unless we do something soon.
You will be in a desperate position. My advice to any non white or non patriot, think about getting out within the next 5 years or so.
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
But what about the 50’s is it that worked well? Why do you feel 50’s society was so much better than today’s? I don’t necessarily disagree that socially the 50’s were a more cohesive, settled, inclusive era BUT I do not accept that multi culturalism has been the cause of this country’s social breakdown
Social cohesion was better, as was the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Now we have atleast 3 asian only areas, white only areas and black only areas. There are faith schooling, more segregation. People dont wana mix, it is not a lovely dovey society thats portrayed. We are constantly lied to. Gun crime is enourmous, thats partly due to a mass of differing cultures, people feeling the need to defend themselves. Also because we have a namby pamby government.
Racial unrest has been big over recent years, weve had numerous murders, riots, hundreds of “discrimination” cases. Again, this causes a them versus us divide, all the governments fault for allowing a multicultural society.
We waste hundreds of thousands, millions maybe on racial organisations. We (the patriotic white community) dont need it. We’d be better off letting you guys fund that.
A successfull society needs a core base of political and social belief, that most people agree with.
At the moment, we dont collectively know what the belief is specifically, other than, we allow non white and non English/british people a fairer go than ourselves. Most people disagree that the multicultural experiment is working, but they dont vote against it yet, rather vote for the very basics, that they think the has been still know what their doing. Most voters are stupid, easily sold, a blaggers dream. The deal is to rally the millions who dont vote, their desperate for a way out of this nightmare.
We’ll never have community spirit whilst theres a mass multiple of differing cultures to feed.
The minority cultures will suffer slayer, when push becomes shove, when the decent people get enough crap thrown at them, unless we do something soon.
You will be in a desperate position. My advice to any non white or non patriot, think about getting out within the next 5 years or so.
Social cohesion better in the 80’s under Thatcher and in the 70’s- the decade of unrest, 3 day week, work to rule, strikes, the dead and rubbish not collected, powercuts, – no, i think it most definitely wasn’t. Social cohesion has broken because of the failure of the family unit- most divorces in Europe, most cohabiting couples in Europe, most single parent families in Europe, highest teenage pregnancy rate in the Western world- the family unit was what held this society together- that has disappeared and hence certain sections of society are now failing- many reasons abound for this breakdown- the lack of discipline and move to a more liberalised society, the advent of contraception (and legal abortion) for women which heralded a new era of sexual freedom, experimentation and lack of responsibility- the baby boomers born in the 60’s and 70’s grew up with a set of moral codes, subconscioulsy given to them by their parents, which manifests itself in the binge, sex immoral culture of today.
BUT little of it has to do with anyone’s colour and with multiculturalism. Just because we have areas where other races feel uncomfortable doesnt make it right- for every area you state where people live in discord, I can show you ten, twenty areas where people live in relative harmony.
You think people in the 50’s werent lied to? The 50’s were the last decade of national innocence, the last decade where people obeyed without question (this post wouldnt have even been thought of in the 50’s), the last decade when social class truly meant anything. Governments govern by being economical with the truth- the 50’s were no different than today except governments of today appear to be more underhand as they try and squash leaks, rumours etc which manifest themselves in many forms of media outlet (specificallythe internet)
Social unrest is and has been endemic in this country and has been for centuries- remember the poll tax riots- largest event of social unrest since the ….oh since the 80’s and the miners strike- dont remember colour or race having anything to do with it. We have had single faith schools for centuries (Jewish, Catholic, CoE) but no one is bothered until the faith is non christian and then hypocrisy flows (incidentally, I believe ALL single faith schools should be banned and have state funded schools only)
We actually agree on the problems we as individuals, and as society face- what we don’t agree on is the cause. The lack fo faith in politics and politicians over the last 20 years demonstrated ably by the reduction in the number of people who vote, has much more to do with a failure to have a common political belief than anything to do with multiculturalism. Emma, if every non white, half white, non english person left the country tomorrow, you’d still have exactly the same fundamental problems which exist now. Demonising sections of our society (which whether you like it or not is the method of genocide- Nazi Germnay, Rwanda, the Balkans- portray the enemy as unworthy and let loose the masses of destruction) is not ony counter productive, it actually increases any polarisation through stereotyping.
I’ve now finished my weetabix
@slayer wrote:
Social cohesion better in the 80’s under Thatcher and in the 70’s- the decade of unrest, 3 day week, work to rule, strikes, the dead and rubbish not collected, powercuts, – no, i think it most definitely wasn’t.
That was MUCH better than the racial murders we have now. We still have some of the above.
Social cohesion has broken because of the failure of the family unit
Something the BNP want to get back.
most divorces in Europe, most cohabiting couples in Europe, most single parent families in Europe, highest teenage pregnancy rate in the Western world- the family unit was what held this society together- that has disappeared and hence certain sections of society are now failing- many reasons abound for this breakdown- the lack of discipline and move to a more liberalised society, the advent of contraception (and legal abortion) for women which heralded a new era of sexual freedom, experimentation and lack of responsibility- the baby boomers born in the 60’s and 70’s grew up with a set of moral codes, subconscioulsy given to them by their parents, which manifests itself in the binge, sex immoral culture of today.
Its not the people who are to blame essentially, they just follow the system that allows them to get away with their prefered pleasures. This has all been allowed to happen by past and present governments.
BUT little of it has to do with anyone’s colour and with multiculturalism. Just because we have areas where other races feel uncomfortable doesnt make it right- for every area you state where people live in discord, I can show you ten, twenty areas where people live in relative harmony.
Take “my” Leicester. Its your typical multi-rubbish celebrated nonsense. We have,
Braunstone, new parks, northfields, which are 99.9% white. Rough council, a bit criminal. 60% welfare dependent.
Beaumont leyes 80% white and where 20% other, both segregated. More than a bit criminal, drug fuelled, very dependent on social welfare.
Highfields (once the posh area of Leicester), a run down asian/black area/red light district/drug sesspit, once the scene of race riots late 70’s/early 80’s. Very dependent on social welfare.
St mathews, or as its known now, st samalia, inbetween highfields and belgrave, is basicly a hellhole of desperateness, with anti-terror cameras and anti-terror swoops. Groups of somalians hanging around outside the shops, not a place to visit for fun. I wont even drive through it.
Rushey mead, thurmaston, evington, middle class asian family, with a mortgage and job.
Belgrave, 99.9% asian. Family orientated, 50% welfare dependent i’d say.
All the other areas, birstall, LFE, clarendon park, blaby, wigston, west end, are about 90% white middle class with between 1 and 2 cars, family etc.Those (lefty extremists, new labour, conservatives, lib dems) who claim Leicester is this great multicultural success, are living in cloud cookoo land. The only area you see whites blacks and asians “mixing”, is the town centre, and thats just because there shopping, you’ll see 5% people mixing.
In Leicester, if you can afford it, you will become one of the white flight, and move to the shires. In the shires, where i am, its about 99.9999% white.
You think people in the 50’s werent lied to? The 50’s were the last decade of national innocence, the last decade where people obeyed without question (this post wouldnt have even been thought of in the 50’s), the last decade when social class truly meant anything. Governments govern by being economical with the truth- the 50’s were no different than today except governments of today appear to be more underhand as they try and squash leaks, rumours etc which manifest themselves in many forms of media outlet (specificallythe internet)
But people in the community got on was better than now.
Social unrest is and has been endemic in this country and has been for centuries- remember the poll tax riots- largest event of social unrest since the ….oh since the 80’s and the miners strike- dont remember colour or race having anything to do with it.
They were political and social unrest.
We have had single faith schools for centuries (Jewish, Catholic, CoE) but no one is bothered until the faith is non christian and then hypocrisy flows (incidentally, I believe ALL single faith schools should be banned and have state funded schools only)
I dont agree with faith schools in England.
We actually agree on the problems we as individuals, and as society face- what we don’t agree on is the cause.
We do a little bit. Im saying racial murder is a reason to end the multicultural experiment, you believe its worth keeping.
The lack fo faith in politics and politicians over the last 20 years demonstrated ably by the reduction in the number of people who vote, has much more to do with a failure to have a common political belief than anything to do with multiculturalism.
But you need a common political belief for the community to come together. We have been divided to be ruled easier.
Emma, if every non white, half white, non english person left the country tomorrow, you’d still have exactly the same fundamental problems which exist now.
We wouldn’t have racial murder ETC. We would have less social unrest, because we would think similar.
Demonising sections of our society (which whether you like it or not is the method of genocide- Nazi Germnay, Rwanda, the Balkans- portray the enemy as unworthy and let loose the masses of destruction) is not ony counter productive, it actually increases any polarisation through stereotyping.
Well your mob started it, im defending myself from this nightmare, and that is my human right.
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Social cohesion better in the 80’s under Thatcher and in the 70’s- the decade of unrest, 3 day week, work to rule, strikes, the dead and rubbish not collected, powercuts, – no, i think it most definitely wasn’t.
That was MUCH better than the racial murders we have now. We still have some of the above.
Social cohesion has broken because of the failure of the family unit
Something the BNP want to get back.
most divorces in Europe, most cohabiting couples in Europe, most single parent families in Europe, highest teenage pregnancy rate in the Western world- the family unit was what held this society together- that has disappeared and hence certain sections of society are now failing- many reasons abound for this breakdown- the lack of discipline and move to a more liberalised society, the advent of contraception (and legal abortion) for women which heralded a new era of sexual freedom, experimentation and lack of responsibility- the baby boomers born in the 60’s and 70’s grew up with a set of moral codes, subconscioulsy given to them by their parents, which manifests itself in the binge, sex immoral culture of today.
Its not the people who are to blame essentially, they just follow the system that allows them to get away with their prefered pleasures. This has all been allowed to happen by past and present governments.
BUT little of it has to do with anyone’s colour and with multiculturalism. Just because we have areas where other races feel uncomfortable doesnt make it right- for every area you state where people live in discord, I can show you ten, twenty areas where people live in relative harmony.
Take “my” Leicester. Its your typical multi-rubbish celebrated nonsense. We have,
Braunstone, new parks, northfields, which are 99.9% white. Rough council, a bit criminal. 60% welfare dependent.
Beaumont leyes 80% white and where 20% other, both segregated. More than a bit criminal, drug fuelled, very dependent on social welfare.
Highfields (once the posh area of Leicester), a run down asian/black area/red light district/drug sesspit, once the scene of race riots late 70’s/early 80’s. Very dependent on social welfare.
St mathews, or as its known now, st samalia, inbetween highfields and belgrave, is basicly a hellhole of desperateness, with anti-terror cameras and anti-terror swoops. Groups of somalians hanging around outside the shops, not a place to visit for fun. I wont even drive through it.
Rushey mead, thurmaston, evington, middle class asian family, with a mortgage and job.
Belgrave, 99.9% asian. Family orientated, 50% welfare dependent i’d say.
All the other areas, birstall, LFE, clarendon park, blaby, wigston, west end, are about 90% white middle class with between 1 and 2 cars, family etc.Those (lefty extremists, new labour, conservatives, lib dems) who claim Leicester is this great multicultural success, are living in cloud cookoo land. The only area you see whites blacks and asians “mixing”, is the town centre, and thats just because there shopping, you’ll see 5% people mixing.
In Leicester, if you can afford it, you will become one of the white flight, and move to the shires. In the shires, where i am, its about 99.9999% white.
You think people in the 50’s werent lied to? The 50’s were the last decade of national innocence, the last decade where people obeyed without question (this post wouldnt have even been thought of in the 50’s), the last decade when social class truly meant anything. Governments govern by being economical with the truth- the 50’s were no different than today except governments of today appear to be more underhand as they try and squash leaks, rumours etc which manifest themselves in many forms of media outlet (specificallythe internet)
But people in the community got on was better than now.
Social unrest is and has been endemic in this country and has been for centuries- remember the poll tax riots- largest event of social unrest since the ….oh since the 80’s and the miners strike- dont remember colour or race having anything to do with it.
They were political and social unrest.
We have had single faith schools for centuries (Jewish, Catholic, CoE) but no one is bothered until the faith is non christian and then hypocrisy flows (incidentally, I believe ALL single faith schools should be banned and have state funded schools only)
I dont agree with faith schools in England.
We actually agree on the problems we as individuals, and as society face- what we don’t agree on is the cause.
We do a little bit. Im saying racial murder is a reason to end the multicultural experiment, you believe its worth keeping.
The lack fo faith in politics and politicians over the last 20 years demonstrated ably by the reduction in the number of people who vote, has much more to do with a failure to have a common political belief than anything to do with multiculturalism.
But you need a common political belief for the community to come together. We have been divided to be ruled easier.
Emma, if every non white, half white, non english person left the country tomorrow, you’d still have exactly the same fundamental problems which exist now.
We wouldn’t have racial murder ETC. We would have less social unrest, because we would think similar.
Demonising sections of our society (which whether you like it or not is the method of genocide- Nazi Germnay, Rwanda, the Balkans- portray the enemy as unworthy and let loose the masses of destruction) is not ony counter productive, it actually increases any polarisation through stereotyping.
Well your mob started it, im defending myself from this nightmare, and that is my human right.
Blahhhhhhhhhhhhh
Emma
Thats Baaaa NOT Blaaahhhh
You’d know :wink:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!