-
AuthorPosts
-
18 December, 2016 at 4:59 pm #1011972
She means the one of Diane Abbot.
Yes, I just worked that one out lol. Sorry, I was a bit slow on that one.
I never voted for her…she doesn’t hold office because of me…..im not ignoring anything…just because I have not mentioned it does not mean I am ignoring it……when did we start discussing the bbc and funding that I am ignoring it…..
The BBC was mentioned just before Diane Abbot was, and you claimed that only an example of one person was given. But that is a fairly minor point.
as for examples….you don’t need your hand holding to go back over the whole thread….do it yourself
There are exactly zero examples in the thread of why Golly is bad. The only thing that comes close is somebody being called a Gollywog. What exactly do you want to do about that, erase Golly from history books and pretend he never existed?
18 December, 2016 at 5:07 pm #1011974You are also ingoring that the government continues to fund the BBC even though they have racist policies
The government does not fund the BBC and I won’t hold my breathe waiting for you to post “evidence” that the BBC has racist policies. The same evidence you demand whenever an opinion is given.
18 December, 2016 at 5:07 pm #1011975Even Hitler is not erased from the history books….now you’re being silly…..I suggest you go back and re read the thread then address any further questions towards me after actually reading what I have written
18 December, 2016 at 5:11 pm #1011976The government does not fund the BBC and I won’t hold my breathe waiting for you to post “evidence” that the BBC has racist policies. The same evidence you demand whenever an opinion is given.
So TV licences are nothing to do with the government then? And there are no punishments for not buying one? I posted evidence of racial discrimination on BBC job adverts, what more evidence could you want?
Even Hitler is not erased from the history books….now you’re being silly…..I suggest you go back and re read the thread then address any further questions towards me after actually reading what I have written
Yes, it was a silly answer because your argument seems silly to me. Nobody has said why the design of Golly itself is racist. Sophia has indirectly implied that black people look like Golly, but I don’t think that they do.
18 December, 2016 at 5:13 pm #1011978You are also ingoring that the government continues to fund the BBC even though they have racist policies
The government does not fund the BBC and I won’t hold my breathe waiting for you to post “evidence” that the BBC has racist policies. The same evidence you demand whenever an opinion is given.
Drac made that comment not me
18 December, 2016 at 5:18 pm #1011980So TV licences are nothing to do with the government then? And there are no punishments for not buying one? I posted evidence of racial discrimination on BBC job adverts, what more evidence could you want?
You didn’t post any evidence, you gave an opinion and what you post ties in with your far right libertarian ideology. You do not budge an inch. The license fee payer funds the BBC, just as the tax payer funds the government.
18 December, 2016 at 5:19 pm #1011981I’ve not argued about golly….I’ve given my opinions on why and how I think it has no place in today’s society….so nothing silly apart from your questions ….if you want a golly have one Drac….don’t feel ashamed on my account
18 December, 2016 at 5:22 pm #1011982I’ve not argued about golly….I’ve given my opinions on why and how I think it has no place in today’s society….so nothing silly apart from your questions ….if you want a golly have one Drac….don’t feel ashamed on my account
I don’t think golliwogs would go down well in the USA.
18 December, 2016 at 5:27 pm #1011983Comments or posts deemed to be of a racist, homophobic, slanderous, religious hatred or violent nature are also breaches of UK law no matter where the site is hosted and are a breach of the UK’s “Communications Act 2003”. I have saved all comments, screenshot private messages and emailed the site owner. I hope this site has an acceptable use policies’ that set out what cannot be put on their website. Most do not allow comments, videos and photos that offend or hurt people. I have also emailed Burstfire networks who are the hosting network company for just chat.
This is my last comment on this nasty little post.
18 December, 2016 at 5:34 pm #1011984You didn’t post any evidence, you gave an opinion and what you post ties in with your far right libertarian ideology. You do not budge an inch.
I’m not even far right, or a libertarian. Lol. I like libertarian politics, but I don’t think privatising infrastructure development or law enforcement would end well. If anything, I am a liberal, an actual liberal, not the progressive kind.
The license fee payer funds the BBC, just as the tax payer funds the government.
Licence fees that are managed by the government.
But on the BBC,
I can find more if none of those are enough to prove my point.
if you want a golly have one Drac….don’t feel ashamed on my account
I don’t want one, my first post on this thread was that I don’t understand why someone would want to buy one.
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘Question’ is closed to new replies.