Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › poor asylum seekers
-
AuthorPosts
-
8 May, 2007 at 12:46 pm #6983
i have just watched the brilliant war correspondent kate aidie on the lunchtime news explaining that there are arount 30.000 failed assylum seekers living rough here in england.[dont know why scotland ireland and wales werent mentioned] she says that these people have a right to settle here even though their claim for assylum has failed ??
surely if the news caster and her pals an find these people to help them then the police should be able to round em up and deport them…
i dont agree that they may face torture or persecution in their own country.
if they managed to travel [in some cases] half way across the globe to get here then they must have the where withall to find another country to settle in.. france germany belgium have the right idea, if they dont have any documents or dont have a genuine case they are returned to the nearest border and sent packing [quite often to britain] and that brings us back to the original point if these do gooders want to help these people they should go to their country to help them, not here.
and yes i am a heartless bitch and ill stand by that as well…8 May, 2007 at 1:08 pm #270159Theres millions of zombies in England that voted for all asylum seekers to live here freely.
8 May, 2007 at 2:54 pm #270160](*,) yep ur right there i suppose the only thing to do is sit tight and wait for the riots to start. i only hope its sooner rather than later…
when the riots in stockport oldham etc kicked off there were almost no arrests as the government didnt want to raise the race issue [unless white folk were being arrested that is] and that is a fact as i know a couple of coppers personally, if it kicks off again i wonder what will happen now ???? the zombies may just have a wake up call coming this summer.[/quote]8 May, 2007 at 10:38 pm #270161yes wasp, you are completely right of course
No arrests were ever made in the oldham riots (oh, except the 17 Muslims)
Cant find anything on a riot in Stockport!
N the numerous muslims arrested over the London march last year over the danish cartoons
etc etc
the police dealt with the oldham riot just the same as any other riot (the sort that occur every week throughout the rest of the country but receive no publicity :wink: )- it aint easy arresting people when theres more of them than you.
The idea that in someway (n im no labour supporter) the government appeases the muslim community over any other just doesnt ring true- only this week the hijab was formally advised as being banned in schools and the high court refused the luton girl the right to wear hers.
The teacher who wore her hijab was sacked for wearing it n not taking it off.
For every soundbite you believe, I can find you another one which tells the opposite story
8 May, 2007 at 11:12 pm #2701629 May, 2007 at 11:13 am #270163slayer the fact is the home office only arrested the london demonstrators after thirteen members of the public complained and john reid finally ordered an inquiry as the police did nohing to top the jihadists openly calling for jihad and death threats for the infidels [us] it took weeks before any action was taken.
last saturday night a riot squad turned up to a street party in leeds being held by students and hospitalised 9 young men and women. where is the justification for that ??
the fact is the police will not take action against the muslim community until they are pressured into it. yet they wil turn up literally mob handed to deal with the wider public.
there has been arrets today in leeds dewsbury and mirfield and im waiting with baited breath for the muslim community to take to the streets and call for the hate mongers to be thrown out of the country. but i doubt they will…10 May, 2007 at 6:38 pm #270164@waspish wrote:
slayer the fact is the home office only arrested the london demonstrators after thirteen members of the public complained and john reid finally ordered an inquiry as the police did nohing to top the jihadists openly calling for jihad and death threats for the infidels [us] it took weeks before any action was taken.
last saturday night a riot squad turned up to a street party in leeds being held by students and hospitalised 9 young men and women. where is the justification for that ??
the fact is the police will not take action against the muslim community until they are pressured into it. yet they wil turn up literally mob handed to deal with the wider public.
there has been arrets today in leeds dewsbury and mirfield and im waiting with baited breath for the muslim community to take to the streets and call for the hate mongers to be thrown out of the country. but i doubt they will…Here here =D> =D> =D> =D>
13 May, 2007 at 7:56 pm #270165@slayer wrote:
yes wasp, you are completely right of course
No arrests were ever made in the oldham riots (oh, except the 17 Muslims)
Cant find anything on a riot in Stockport!
N the numerous muslims arrested over the London march last year over the danish cartoons
etc etc
the police dealt with the oldham riot just the same as any other riot (the sort that occur every week throughout the rest of the country but receive no publicity :wink: )- it aint easy arresting people when theres more of them than you.
The idea that in someway (n im no labour supporter) the government appeases the muslim community over any other just doesnt ring true- only this week the hijab was formally advised as being banned in schools and the high court refused the luton girl the right to wear hers.
The teacher who wore her hijab was sacked for wearing it n not taking it off.
For every soundbite you believe, I can find you another one which tells the opposite story
As Jack Straw recently stated the hijab is in itself a barrier to making any form of conversation.. As a teacher I believe she had NO right to wear her bloody scarves in a classroom environment.. it not only alienates her ( basically due to the fact that the face is expressive and wearing a bloody sheet over her face takes away simple human features that children can relate to).I were stood next to you and refused to look you in the eye or stood with my back to you whilst in conversation you would be offended would you not :?: I fail to see what the difference is…. If we as white people went to a muslim country wearing mini skirts and low tops…we’d be stoned.. or atleast ridiculed as a whore…. why should we be expected to conform to their dress mcode and they dont to ours :?: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
And Slayer..please dont say that the hijab is a part of her religion.. as we all know that the hijab is a personal choice matter :wink:
PS I still love you by the way :wink: :lol:
15 June, 2007 at 3:24 pm #270166its amazing how quiet some people become when they are proved wrong.people have been called names for voicing oppinions and there was me thinking this was a discussion forum. well if you can only have your say if the self elected elite agree with you i feel sorry for you. a democracy is just that, it calls for freedom of thought and speech and no matter wether you believe in what the person says, we must always allow them to say it however distasteful. i will fight to the death to allow anyone freedom of speech whoever and whatever their beliefs even the mad mullahs and suicide jockeys.so think on when trying to silence someone elses views just because you dont agree with them because before long you may not have that freedom yourself.having sarcasm as your weapon of choice only shows how truly ignorant we can be toward each other.
15 June, 2007 at 5:26 pm #270167@waspish wrote:
its amazing how quiet some people become when they are proved wrong.people have been called names for voicing oppinions and there was me thinking this was a discussion forum. well if you can only have your say if the self elected elite agree with you i feel sorry for you. a democracy is just that, it calls for freedom of thought and speech and no matter wether you believe in what the person says, we must always allow them to say it however distasteful. i will fight to the death to allow anyone freedom of speech whoever and whatever their beliefs even the mad mullahs and suicide jockeys.so think on when trying to silence someone elses views just because you dont agree with them because before long you may not have that freedom yourself.having sarcasm as your weapon of choice only shows how truly ignorant we can be toward each other.
I assume this was aimed at me but without a quote or name, its difficult to tell
And you are indeed right, truth does hurt :wink: as i can see by your reply
Fact is, my response was 95% fact and 5% sarcasm
Truth is my weapon Wasp
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!