-
Posts
-
Well hopefully the 3 million she put to the charity will help some of his lil mates, rather than no million they have a lil more chance with it than without it, though i must admit i would rather we worried about the homeless, parentless, orphans in this country first and foremost, rather than other countries babies, but thats just a bit narrow minded and cruel of me i guess but i think we should look after are own first, but good luck to those that will benefit from her donation we cant decide who donates to what charity thats personal choice and cant really be frowned upon,atleast they are willing and able to give at all.
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
Do you think she is trying to get a council house? She has 2 kids by diffent farthers and now she has a brown one too.
quote from have I got news for you:
She is a typical british mum, She wears a tracksuit, lives on a big estate and has 3 kids with different dads :wink:
@(f)politics? wrote:
like many have said she doesnt parade her children in front of the media now so why do we assume this one will be different
Her new baby was the subject of mass media following it around without “parent” insight. The nanny swinging the baby this way, that way to avoid a photo flash.
shouldnt we just be greatful that not only has she given alot of money to the charity and the child family she has raised awareness.
Theres something very wrong when we “need” a failing singer to tell us about third world starvasion, especially when that singer releases a single immediately after.
What are we, material girls?
he may even grow up well educated,balanced and cared for and go back and work at improving the problems over there, wouldnt that be worth the adoption of one child like himself alone ?
Absolutely, but it wont make me buy his new single…
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!