Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 76 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #467515

    @gazlan wrote:

    And the good old bbc, they have never once given a believable explanation how their
    ‘on the ground’ reporter gave details of the collapse of the trade centre tower number seven appx 30 minutes before it actually fell. In fact it was in the background in one piece as the rubbish was being transmitted and broadcast.

    Snap out of it people . . . . Rid youselves of the TV and begin to live.[/b]

    BBC News reported the collapse of 7 WTC twenty minutes before it actually fell.[51] The BBC has stated that many news sources were reporting the imminent collapse of 7 WTC on the day of the attacks.[52] Jane Standley, the reporter who announced the collapse prematurely, called it a “very small and very honest mistake” caused by her thinking on her feet after being confronted with a report she had no way of checking.

    Seems like a genuine and easy mistake given the chaos and the number of buildings in the vicinity.

    Sorry, 9/11 was not a conspiracy. Ironically the date is the same as the US emergency no.

    #467516

    @panda12 wrote:

    Seems like a genuine and easy mistake given the chaos and the number of buildings in the vicinity.

    Sorry, 9/11 was not a conspiracy. Ironically the date is the same as the US emergency no.

    5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error – no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… “

    . . . . SOURCE
    RUBBISH! How can anyone make an error about a building collapsing 20 odd minutes before it actually collapses ? They have not explained how they came to this conclusion, error or not !

    #467517

    @rubyred wrote:

    och gaz, ya did not need to go to all that bother,, he will have his Pic on his secret member of the C.I.A card ;)

    Hehehe you mean like this one ?

    #467518

    eve

    O well, u have to a hand it to the yanks. They take the bin out on bank holidays.

    #467519

    @gazlan wrote:

    @panda12 wrote:

    Seems like a genuine and easy mistake given the chaos and the number of buildings in the vicinity.

    Sorry, 9/11 was not a conspiracy. Ironically the date is the same as the US emergency no.

    5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error – no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… “

    . . . . SOURCE
    RUBBISH! How can anyone make an error about a building collapsing 20 odd minutes before it actually collapses ? They have not explained how they came to this conclusion, error or not !

    You know Gaz, you need to get out more and live and work in the real World then you might understand that not everything, esp in the midst of sheer utter chaos, confusion, death and suffering as 9/11 was, is so straightforward in life.

    As it is, you are such a so damn paranoid armchair warrior I bet you think even your duvet cover is out to get you.

    Well I hope it is and I hope it gags you then calls in your pillow to finish you off. :roll:

    #467520

    @panda12 wrote:

    You know Gaz, you need to get out more and live and work in the real World then you might understand that not everything, esp in the midst of sheer utter chaos, confusion, death and suffering as 9/11 was, is so straightforward in life.

    As it is, you are such a so damn paranoid armchair warrior I bet you think even your duvet cover is out to get you.

    Well I hope it is and I hope it gags you then calls in your pillow to finish you off. :roll:

    And become just another face in the crowd right . . . . Another Pandacus right ?

    Another hopeless response from you which fails to address the point made and shows you to be just another brick in the wall.
    You know Panda, i would rather gag on my duvet than choke to death on msm shyte, Panda is the right name for you, as all you do is panda to the masters.

    #467521

    @irish_lucy wrote:

    Osama Bin Laden is dead. It’s amazing what the Americans can do when the Playstation Network is down.

    :lol: Lucy, now this is one of the funniest posts I’ve read in a long time……..although I shouldn’t be laughing as my card was fraudulantly used by the hackers! :lol:

    #467522

    You know Panda, i would rather gag on my duvet than choke to death on msm shyte, Panda is the right name for you, as all you do is panda to the masters.

    Hehehehehehe!

    Whilst you sponge off benefits Gaz you are not “free.”

    You are dependent on the system and the masters you so loathe to home, feed and clothe you and pay for your broadband.

    Have the courage of your convictions Gaz! Go and be truely “free” – live on the streets and beg!

    No? Didn’t think so.

    #467523

    Al Qaida is such a huge organisation Bin Laden was only one small part of it, especially since he had been in hiding. I suspet many many hundreds of his Henchmen are just as evil and capable of plotting mass murders on the scale of the Twin Towers tragedy.
    My son is going to America on Thursday and I’m worried to be honest, he has the attitude if anything is to happen to him it could happen here, which is true of course.
    I think I would have preferred him rotting in jail for the rest of his sorry life rather than him being killed, but if reports are to be believed he was given the opportunity to surrender and he was killed before he killed. But I am glad he is caught and dead than not being caught at all.

    #467524

    Hehehehehehe!

    Whilst you sponge off benefits Gaz you are not “free.”

    You are dependent on the system and the masters you so loathe to home, feed and clothe you and pay for your broadband.

    Have the courage of your convictions Gaz! Go and be truely “free” – live on the streets and beg!

    No? Didn’t think so.

    :lol: :wink:

    My we are bitter aren’t we . . . :o

    Look at it as a kind of gentleman’s agreement :lol: they {the Govt.} infringe upon my natural rights, I then allow them to take care of any state demands made against me, for example council tax and rent while also contributing to my very minimal living expenses . . . Everyone’s a winner. I even visit there agents once a fortnight without fail, despite my extensive habitual personal agenda. Now you can’t tell me that’s not a square deal.

Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 76 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!