-
Posts
-
Chess was brilliant last night and so was Dexter was a close thing:)
Can i have Simon on poets team helping from the studio to help me out next week ? or would that just be unethical lol :lol:@poet wrote:
Well done to my team…well those that turned up :evil: Those that were AWOL are fined a weeks wages ie no alcohol or crisps for a week :lol: Big thanks to chess for phoning in and Mr chess for holding her hand and the phone :D As usual I thank all of my team for the effort and commitment, even tho’ several of them were not match fit :wink: Bad luck to Fasty’s team, well done to Dexter who called in for them, hell he gave us a great game =D> On a final note, get well soon Pats :(
I am so so so sorry, I was so dead in the head with no sleep for 2 days and being with my baby in labour that I totally forgot :oops: I would have been rubbish anyway Poet. apparently, I fell asleep in my dinner, in the middle of a conversation about my 12 year olds medication!!!!! (ffs) Will try to do better
well done to both teams on last night quiz.
Chessykins….. you done good girl. :wink:
glad you got over your nerves.
what a clever cookie you are. :wink:
GM. xxxxx
I wasnt very well and missed the quiz but managed to hear bits between buffering.
well done Chessy, you sexy voiced vixen you, and also Dexter, another star
xxxwell done ches an dex to superb phone in;s
No worries Dawny 8) You can rejoin my team when you’re feeling up to it :D Oh and by the way he’s a cutie pie bless him :) I’ll try to post or send some pics of my Grandaughter when I can get me head round how the boards work again :?
As for the rest of my team, you really are in for the “Sir Alex Ferguson” hair dryer and cup throwing treatment when you next turn up for training :evil: :wink:
On a final note…..let’s get UK and PB back for the Xmas Quiz !!!!!! Methinks bribery and or corruption might work so give it a try folks :lol:
PS. This post was written at this late hour due to me being stupid once again and staying up to listen to England play cricket
Oh and if anyone knows how the Duckworth Lewis system works please explain it to the rest of the cricketing world :wink:If this is the simplest method for the Duckworth Lewis System I can see how the officials get confused.
At its simplest, the problem is this. If the side batting first in a 50-over match makes 250 runs, the target for the side batting second is 250 to tie, 251 to win. Their average run-rate must therefore exceed 5 per over if they are to win in a full 50 overs. But if rain or bad light stops further play after only 20 overs, during which the second side score 101 runs, then comparing average run-rates would make the second side the winner. But if they had lost nine wickets in gaining those 101 runs, then few would give much for their chances in an uninterrupted 50 overs. So the old average-run rate system gave an unfair advantage to the side batting second if the number of overs was reduced. They could blaze away without worrying too much about losing wickets. Other variants were tried, such as basing the target on the best overs of the side batting first, but this was unfair to the side batting second.
CL..put me down for the Dec 1st phone-in please..I wanna marmalise Bad Manners!
ohh esme thats fightin talk
@esmeralda wrote:
CL..put me down for the Dec 1st phone-in please..I wanna marmalise Bad Manners!
Pml Esme @ Marmalise :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Well done to both teams for Mondays radio quiz, yet again it went to deadlock :shock: I’d like to thank the few of those from my team that turned up, the rest of them that were absent I will set chess and cath on ya 8)
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!