-
Posts
-
I can see your point very clearly however, i must disagree. When i talk of ” natural ” i of course allude to the logical thinking human. It is a fact that these same s~ex activities occur throughout the natural world. Humankind are unlike any other living creature, we have mastered all other species, we have conscience controlled thought, we are aware that reproduction is caused by the coming together { no pun intended } of two opposite s~exes…..We are aware and have mastered anatomy and the workings of the body and organs…. That being so, i believe that as we are in full command of this knowledge and activities, we also become aware of the deviation from their natural purpose…. i cannot accept that using the anal tract for self gratification is anything other than a perversion from nature, the animal knows no better, has no shame with conscience regardless of any spiritual ideology.
Of course it is every persons right to take part in these activities, each to their own, however, we also control our own actions and have within our power the will to refrain and become celibate…. These people who seek gratification with minors, what are we to think of these people ? Why can they not control this disgraceful behaviour, they obviously enjoy this behaviour yet we as ” decent ” human beings curse them….Questions questions…
1. Is it just male homosexuals that are unnatural to you?
2. Why? Because of the way they have sex (you can type it without the ~, it isn’t a censored word) or because it’s not for procreation?
3. If the former, what about all the heterosexual couples who have sex that way?
4. If the former, does that mean you don’t have a problem with female homosexuals, i.e. lesbians?
5. If the latter, what about couples who can’t have children therefore can’t procreate but carry on having sex anyway?I could go on, but to my mind making a judgement on one set of individuals because you don’t agree with their lifestyle then opens up a whole raft of questions about how you view others that to all intents and purposes seem “normal” (whatever that is).
What happens between two consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes is their business and nobody elses. If it doesn’t have a direct impact on you, what’s the problem?
What happens between two consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes is their business and nobody elses. If it doesn’t have a direct impact on you, what’s the problem?
Agrees entirely with this statement… each to their own is my motto
Agrees entirely with this statement… each to their own is my motto
Hi babez …look …
Of course it is every persons right to take part in these activities, each to their own
Great minds….? :wink:
Questions questions…
1. Is it just male homosexuals that are unnatural to you?
2. Why? Because of the way they have sex (you can type it without the ~, it isn’t a censored word) or because it’s not for procreation?
3. If the former, what about all the heterosexual couples who have sex that way?
4. If the former, does that mean you don’t have a problem with female homosexuals, i.e. lesbians?
5. If the latter, what about couples who can’t have children therefore can’t procreate but carry on having sex anyway?I could go on, but to my mind making a judgement on one set of individuals because you don’t agree with their lifestyle then opens up a whole raft of questions about how you view others that to all intents and purposes seem “normal” (whatever that is).
What happens between two consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes is their business and nobody elses. If it doesn’t have a direct impact on you, what’s the problem?
If any of the above deviate from nature in a search for gratification using the bodies waste system then in my opinion it cannot be justified. The fact that animals carry out these unnatural activities does not for one instant justify it.
@gazlan wrote:
If any of the above deviate from nature in a search for gratification using the bodies waste system then in my opinion it cannot be justified. The fact that animals carry out these unnatural activities does not for one instant justify it.
So male homosexuals and heterosexual couples who enjoy anal sex “cannot be justified”.
But female homosexuals, i.e. lesbians, don’t have sex in this way so they can be justified…correct?
And anyone who has sex in the “normal” way, however they go about it, can also be justified…correct?Opinions are very like butt holes… we all have them… we just don’t show them to everyone…… I personally have never felt the need to ram mine down anyones throat.
Having opinions is not unhealthy…… not accepting that others differ from yours is.
Some of us just don’t feel the need to rant on and on about stuff that annoys us.
There is no such thing as normal behaviour….. we as humans evolved into what we are today.. some of us good some of us not… what irritates me most in all of these so called debates is some peoples arrogance at not accepting that their opinion is not held by nor understood by others… if you don’t want to open yourself to criticism of your beliefs…… THEN DON’T POST THEM !
I however cannot nor will never understand, condone or support humans that defend acts of violence towards others as their only defense for whatever grievance they may have.
Incidently if your butt hole is for waste disposal….. then ergo your mouth is for eating and talking…. is kissing out then ?????
Phew glad you said kissing…given the recent content of this thread I wondered where you were going with that one! :oops: :lol:
@jen_jen wrote:
Phew glad you said kissing…given the recent content of this thread I wondered where you were going with that one! :oops: :lol:
I was going to say that sex with a certain someone must be very dull if it involves merely penetration for procreation purposes…. but i held back (til now)
I think theres something a little more odd is people who are so obsessed with the sex lives of others!!!!
Like Gazlan you mean
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!