-
Posts
-
To the God fearing pious….anyone commiting such acts should be put to death according to the main religions….
The question posed in the thread is `homosexuality-natural or un-natural……..of course, defining natural is always a contentious issue, in terms of biological thinking, natural means to me the reproduction of life, given that the `natural ` means of reproduction is by way of inception and conception through the participation of sexual intercourse between two bodies….i will add, this inception process mainly incorperates a degree of lust/attraction…in terms of homosexuality and reproduction, i class the acts of homosexuals to be un-natural…..in terms of lust/attraction…..then of course it is a personal decision.
Not forgetting that the intestinal system which includes the endpoint the anus which, naturally is the means of disposing of bodily waste…the act of using the anus for self gratification in my opinion must be considered a devious deviation from nature……i conclude then, any behaviour using the anus for self gratfication must be considered un-natural and cannot be justified.
I appreciate any comments which can justify the acts carried out by the homosexual..need i say anymore ?……….really???
Yes, you will notice the facts in my staement….Can you see the facts ?
@gazlan wrote:
Yes, you will notice the facts in my staement….Can you see the facts ?
Nope
didn`t read it :)
Well you read this one….har-har
Yes, you will notice the facts in my staement….Can you see the facts ?
@gazlan wrote:
Well you read this one….har-har
Yes, you will notice the facts in my staement….Can you see the facts ?
dammit
you got me
ok, so I read some of them
there are no facts there just youre twisted views !
I appreciate any comments which can justify the acts carried out by the homosexual..
8)
The world’s main religions, that is Christianity, Islam, Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist (if we count their set of beliefs, basically the doubting of a revealed godhead, as a religion in itself), Hinduism and Chinese traditional religion, are all more or less mutually exclusive. That is, at least four out of those five must be fundamentally untrue. Incorrect. A load of old twaddle. At least four. They’re only the super-big religions. There must be hundreds, even thousands of religions that have existed or do exist. All but one of them, by the laws of logic, must be duff info. Logic does not preclude all of them being total codswallop. The chance that any one of them is the true religion must therefore be a fraction of one per cent.
That given, and not being a particular follower of any one of those religions, why would you lend any credence to any of their views when deciding on your stance on any given behaviour? It seems more sensible to make your own mind up.
It is true bumming doesn’t come without health risks but, that said, so do lots of things we fail to condemn. Like motor racing, for instance, or smoking or drinking. Generally, as long as we are certain everybody is acting in an informed manner and no-one is being coerced and it’s not hurting anyone else, we are happy to let people take their own risks. To most people, life without any risk is dull dull dull. We each have our vice. Or vices. Ahem.
As for nature, well, both homosexuality and sodomy* are both regularly observed in the natural world. How can something that happens in nature be unnatural? It doesn’t seem to make sense.
These musings lead me to take the view that there is no real problem with gayist, or any other kind of, bumming. Some people just like to get worked up about it. Issues, I suppose.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!