Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Not always a good idea
-
AuthorPosts
-
13 March, 2008 at 8:47 pm #317591
@johnboy25 wrote:
By throwing stones at ‘him’ (that’s a bit sexist – could have been a girl. We don’t know) and kicking its (think that’s a better term to describe the little shytebags) arse then it could be proved pretty easily :lol:
My apologies him /her/it’s, maybe they could prove it, im with waspish on this one, fortunately down round yer very few people would dare report it after a “talk too” we aint caught up with modern “kids are always right” thing yet, very few kids or parents would think it’s wrong to reprimand a child for such things so it probably wouldnt get to the point of involving the police. But yeah some would i guess and it’s still rubbish that this sort of thing can happen, to the innocents, it’s like the burglars who sue the home owners for hitting them how the hell can any judge or jury come up with that rubbish.
13 March, 2008 at 10:18 pm #317592how the hell can any judge or jury come up with that rubbish
I don’t think a judge or jury did come up with that, I’m pretty certain it was the government.
The kids in this area are too full of themselves to take a telling to, but they also know that the law can protect them anyway so they’re laughing all the way. Plus a lot them carry knives (meat cleavers in the waistband aren’t uncommon either) so I wouldn’t be the one to try and drum some sense into them.
14 March, 2008 at 4:11 pm #317593@johnboy25 wrote:
how the hell can any judge or jury come up with that rubbish
I don’t think a judge or jury did come up with that, I’m pretty certain it was the government.
The kids in this area are too full of themselves to take a telling to, but they also know that the law can protect them anyway so they’re laughing all the way. Plus a lot them carry knives (meat cleavers in the waistband aren’t uncommon either) so I wouldn’t be the one to try and drum some sense into them.
Jesus i’m glad i dont live where you do, that sort thing just shouldn’t be allowed to happen, no one should carry weapons like that let alone kids, if people know this around the area is it not possible to get a kinda of raid done or are they protected from being searched without due cause too ?? im asking cos i really dont know where the law stands, if people on the street know this about the kids around surely the law do ?
There has to be an answer somehow surely!!! Can’t the government . law enforcement services see what’s going on in some areas or are they truely in ivory towers and have no idea ?14 March, 2008 at 6:24 pm #317594The police don’t have stop and search powers here as in England so everyone’s protected in that sense. The only way someone can legally be searched is if they’re arrested. And they can’t go around arresting random people on the off chance, that would open up a whole new can of worms. Plus they’re not allowed to. They’re only allowed to do what they’re allowed to do.
To me, it’s the same as the druggies. The police know who they are, but they can’t arrest them for BEING dealers but they can arrest them for actually dealing when they know it’s happened or happening. Where’s the logic there?!
18 March, 2008 at 5:38 pm #317595There’s a piece about it in the Scottish Sun today (if I hadn’t been ogling Pamela Anderson for so long I’d have missed it) and it tells a slightly more detailed story than the initial one. Love the fact that his mother complained that her boy was targeted as he never ran away and was therefore the easiest.
Could be that or it could be the fact that chasing a teenage boy and ordering him into your car is really something else entirely.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!