Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Nick Griffin & Abu Hamza at the Radio Academy 2002
-
AuthorPosts
-
11 March, 2008 at 2:09 am #9562
Absolutely amazing radio show hosted by Rod Liddle with two figures in politics that most folks would switch off from. But what a great debate, no shouting and screaming, everyone allowed to speak in an adult manner without interuptions.
In the first ten minutes, Rod Liddle explains that free speech is imperitive with a hard to hear interview Paxman did before hand. And then gives Nick Griffin the chance to explain his stance to a media audience. Neutrals will find what he says interesting.
Then Abu Hamza, is this the kind of man reported in the media? He finishes at 46 mins. Then Rod quizzies him on freedom to disagree with islam.
Back to Nick 50 min. Right at the end Nick explains that an angry young asian said he’d vote for the BNP because a BNP government would support his native kashmiry land.
http://seanbryson.com/articles/dlod.html#nick scroll down a little bit
Why do the mass media stifle opinions? Why shouldn’t someone like Abu be allowed on question time, rather than the same old “comfortable” contestents? Do we not deserve all opinions before we make up our minds? Is our liberal society inward looking, seems like it to me.
Well done Rod liddle.
11 March, 2008 at 7:34 am #317126Question Time should have every opinion on it…after all they have had George Galloway several times!
Its whether you believe Abu Hamza (i thought he was in prison?) represents Muslim Britons or just the extreme ones
I suppose its like saying whether you believe the IRA represented all Irish Catholics..or just the extreme minority who believe in murder?
Actually Abu Hamza IS in prison…so how did an interview take place?
11 March, 2008 at 8:29 am #317127Perhaps 2002 gives a bit of a clue, could be wrong of course.
11 March, 2008 at 6:45 pm #317128Could be an indication I suppose
11 March, 2008 at 10:49 pm #317129oops slayer, a case of foot in mouth there pet ? :lol: :lol:
the problem is that whilst the scottish national party, and the welsh [however its spelt] national party, are allowed to be just that. a nationalist party. we in england are all classed as racists because we arent allowed a nationalistic viewpoint. we arent allowed to say that we arent happy with being swamped in foreign nationals. [of any kind] we are seen as swastika following skinheads if we have the nerve to talk about the failure of multicultural britain. as we know only too well. if you dare to speak out or you dare to vote for the BRITISH NATIONAL party you have to be a tattooed thug who struts around in doc martins wearing a vest and cut off jeans. [mind you i do like to see….. shut up you old slapper] ha ha. im heart sick of being told i cant have a vote if i vote for the nationalist party for england. and why ? because the rekigious fekkers have their fingers in the politics pie. and only they and their leftie toads are allowed to foist their opinions on us, the people who have to work 6 days a week to keep up with the jonses, while the dss scroungers and the asian tsunami are fed and kept at our expense. did yopu lot know that the average councul tax in england wil have to rise at the rate of 4.5 percent per year just to cover the pensions of retired government pen pushers ? and in ten years time it will be worse still ? better get voting for the ??????? party eh ? i know the one that has my interests at heart. and at athe end of the day thats what its all about. which party has you at heart. cos the community has gone to hell in a burkah and a council van.11 March, 2008 at 11:16 pm #317130@slayer wrote:
Question Time should have every opinion on it…after all they have had George Galloway several times!
Well he is an elected MP, unlike some of the “comedians” and script writers (always lefties) they have on.
The BBC is TOOOOO PC in asking Nick Griffin or Richard Barnbrook (the leader of the opposition in Barking) to take part.
As Nick said in the above interview, if what he says is wrong, then he’ll be exposed.
But the old gang KNOW that it wont be them exposing Nick, it will be Nick exposing them.
16 March, 2008 at 9:55 pm #317131I have always had a very strong opinion that Thursdays are always Thursdays, and people are not sufficiently aware of this fact. But I’m denied the right to go on TV to voice my belief. If I demand air time I’m made to feel like I’m mad. Surely this is discrimination.
16 March, 2008 at 10:32 pm #317132@waspish wrote:
oops slayer, a case of foot in mouth there pet ? :lol: :lol:
the problem is that whilst the scottish national party, and the welsh [however its spelt] national party, are allowed to be just that. a nationalist party. we in england are all classed as racists because we arent allowed a nationalistic viewpoint. we arent allowed to say that we arent happy with being swamped in foreign nationals. [of any kind] we are seen as swastika following skinheads if we have the nerve to talk about the failure of multicultural britain. as we know only too well. if you dare to speak out or you dare to vote for the BRITISH NATIONAL party you have to be a tattooed thug who struts around in doc martins wearing a vest and cut off jeans. [mind you i do like to see….. shut up you old slapper] ha ha. im heart sick of being told i cant have a vote if i vote for the nationalist party for england. and why ? because the rekigious fekkers have their fingers in the politics pie. and only they and their leftie toads are allowed to foist their opinions on us, the people who have to work 6 days a week to keep up with the jonses, while the dss scroungers and the asian tsunami are fed and kept at our expense. did yopu lot know that the average councul tax in england wil have to rise at the rate of 4.5 percent per year just to cover the pensions of retired government pen pushers ? and in ten years time it will be worse still ? better get voting for the ??????? party eh ? i know the one that has my interests at heart. and at athe end of the day thats what its all about. which party has you at heart. cos the community has gone to hell in a burkah and a council van.The SNP and Plaid Cymru embrace all cultures, creeds and races and recognise them as Scottish or Welsh
The BNP (or should that be ENP) only recognise those who are white and English- it may indeed be a nationalistic party but please dont compare them with the Scots n Welsh cos there is no comparison
17 March, 2008 at 1:27 pm #317133@bassingbourne55 wrote:
I have always had a very strong opinion that Thursdays are always Thursdays, and people are not sufficiently aware of this fact. But I’m denied the right to go on TV to voice my belief. If I demand air time I’m made to feel like I’m mad. Surely this is discrimination.
I know exactly what you mean. If you don’t act like the current mob on the show then you’re the enemy. If you say humans aren’t causing GW, these same people make you out to be a bad person.
Its got to the stage where about a year ago, just before a man asked a question, he said, im such n such, im a British National Party member, then read out his question.
That seems like the only way to get a non “old gang” voice on the show.
Can you imagine the audience figures if Nick Griffin was a panelist. Would be the most watched QT ever, not because of his support, but because he would create a cross debate.
17 March, 2008 at 1:38 pm #317134@slayer wrote:
The SNP and Plaid Cymru embrace all cultures, creeds and races and recognise them as Scottish or Welsh
The BNP (or should that be ENP) only recognise those who are white and English- it may indeed be a nationalistic party but please dont compare them with the Scots n Welsh cos there is no comparison
The snp and plaid recognise the English and other foreign culture nationalities? If so, then why the national name…you are an idiot slavery.
The BNP recognise that people of different colours have an ethnic place of birth. It is the fault of your mob that ethnic colours collide, and it is to the benefit of all of us that the colour culture of this planet be preserved, not brought together to create unrest.
That means preseving ethnic white and ethnic asian etc by encouraging a white England and a asian India.
Im quite happy for you and the multiculturalists to have half of britain and the other half be white. But you don’t want that, you’re scared of it. You need a prodomanent white society, makes you feel safe. If memory serves me correct, you live far away from a multicultural society, in the rural outback of Lincolnshire :roll:
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!